Exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block: A comparative study

Kentaro Yamane, Nobuo Kai, Tadashi Miyamoto, Tomohiro Matsushita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Exposure to radiation over many years prompts concerns regarding potential health-related effects, particularly the incidence of cataracts and the development of cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block. Methods A total of 114 examinations were performed in our institute in the 6 months. Sixty-two examinations were performed during myelography in the first 3 months (MG group), while 52 were performed during radiculography and root block in the last 3 months (RB group). The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective dose and the equivalent doses of hand, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results The mean equivalent doses were significantly lower outside the neck, torso, eye protectors, and inside the torso protector in the RB group than in the MG group. Conversely, the mean equivalent dose was significantly lower outside the hand protector in the MG group than in the RB group. The use of a neck protector significantly decreased the effective dose compared to the non-use of a neck protector in the RB group. Conclusions The present study showed the standard radiation exposure to the examiner during myelography, radiculography, and root block. Receiving full protection including a neck protector and protection gloves is an easy and reliable means to reduce radiation exposure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-247
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Myelography
Neck
Torso
Radiation
Radiation Protection
Luminescence
Hand
Cataract
Glass
Skin
Incidence
Health
Radiation Exposure
Radiation Dosimeters
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block : A comparative study. / Yamane, Kentaro; Kai, Nobuo; Miyamoto, Tadashi; Matsushita, Tomohiro.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 243-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff4ad316cb9443609f2252a02a118846,
title = "Exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block: A comparative study",
abstract = "Background Exposure to radiation over many years prompts concerns regarding potential health-related effects, particularly the incidence of cataracts and the development of cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block. Methods A total of 114 examinations were performed in our institute in the 6 months. Sixty-two examinations were performed during myelography in the first 3 months (MG group), while 52 were performed during radiculography and root block in the last 3 months (RB group). The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective dose and the equivalent doses of hand, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results The mean equivalent doses were significantly lower outside the neck, torso, eye protectors, and inside the torso protector in the RB group than in the MG group. Conversely, the mean equivalent dose was significantly lower outside the hand protector in the MG group than in the RB group. The use of a neck protector significantly decreased the effective dose compared to the non-use of a neck protector in the RB group. Conclusions The present study showed the standard radiation exposure to the examiner during myelography, radiculography, and root block. Receiving full protection including a neck protector and protection gloves is an easy and reliable means to reduce radiation exposure.",
author = "Kentaro Yamane and Nobuo Kai and Tadashi Miyamoto and Tomohiro Matsushita",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jos.2016.11.018",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "243--247",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Science",
issn = "0949-2658",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block

T2 - A comparative study

AU - Yamane, Kentaro

AU - Kai, Nobuo

AU - Miyamoto, Tadashi

AU - Matsushita, Tomohiro

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background Exposure to radiation over many years prompts concerns regarding potential health-related effects, particularly the incidence of cataracts and the development of cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block. Methods A total of 114 examinations were performed in our institute in the 6 months. Sixty-two examinations were performed during myelography in the first 3 months (MG group), while 52 were performed during radiculography and root block in the last 3 months (RB group). The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective dose and the equivalent doses of hand, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results The mean equivalent doses were significantly lower outside the neck, torso, eye protectors, and inside the torso protector in the RB group than in the MG group. Conversely, the mean equivalent dose was significantly lower outside the hand protector in the MG group than in the RB group. The use of a neck protector significantly decreased the effective dose compared to the non-use of a neck protector in the RB group. Conclusions The present study showed the standard radiation exposure to the examiner during myelography, radiculography, and root block. Receiving full protection including a neck protector and protection gloves is an easy and reliable means to reduce radiation exposure.

AB - Background Exposure to radiation over many years prompts concerns regarding potential health-related effects, particularly the incidence of cataracts and the development of cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the exposure of the examiner to radiation during myelography versus radiculography and root block. Methods A total of 114 examinations were performed in our institute in the 6 months. Sixty-two examinations were performed during myelography in the first 3 months (MG group), while 52 were performed during radiculography and root block in the last 3 months (RB group). The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective dose and the equivalent doses of hand, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results The mean equivalent doses were significantly lower outside the neck, torso, eye protectors, and inside the torso protector in the RB group than in the MG group. Conversely, the mean equivalent dose was significantly lower outside the hand protector in the MG group than in the RB group. The use of a neck protector significantly decreased the effective dose compared to the non-use of a neck protector in the RB group. Conclusions The present study showed the standard radiation exposure to the examiner during myelography, radiculography, and root block. Receiving full protection including a neck protector and protection gloves is an easy and reliable means to reduce radiation exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013864626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013864626&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2016.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2016.11.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 27998661

AN - SCOPUS:85013864626

VL - 22

SP - 243

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

SN - 0949-2658

IS - 2

ER -