Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects

Akito Monden, Masateru Tsunoda, Mike Barker, Kenichi Matsumoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Research findings are often expressed as short, startling sentences, or software engineering (SE) beliefs, such as 'about 80 percent of the defects come from 20 percent of the modules' and 'peer reviews catch 60 percent of the defects.' Such SE beliefs are particularly important in industry, because they are attention-getting, easily understandable, and thus practically useful. The authors examine the power of such SE beliefs to justify process improvements by empirically validating selected beliefs in relation to the increase or decrease of defects in system testing. They explore four basic SE beliefs in data from two midsize embedded software development organizations in Japan. Based on this information, they identify possible process improvements for each organization. The authors have determined that even small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can use this approach to find possible directions for improving their processes, which will result in better products.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7914576
Pages (from-to)58-64
Number of pages7
JournalIT Professional
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Software engineering
Defects
Testing
Embedded software
Industry

Keywords

  • Quality assurance
  • Software engineering
  • Software measurement
  • System testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects. / Monden, Akito; Tsunoda, Masateru; Barker, Mike; Matsumoto, Kenichi.

In: IT Professional, Vol. 19, No. 2, 7914576, 01.03.2017, p. 58-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Monden, A, Tsunoda, M, Barker, M & Matsumoto, K 2017, 'Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects', IT Professional, vol. 19, no. 2, 7914576, pp. 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2017.31
Monden, Akito ; Tsunoda, Masateru ; Barker, Mike ; Matsumoto, Kenichi. / Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects. In: IT Professional. 2017 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 58-64.
@article{59dd530ddffd4df697467957f46cb685,
title = "Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects",
abstract = "Research findings are often expressed as short, startling sentences, or software engineering (SE) beliefs, such as 'about 80 percent of the defects come from 20 percent of the modules' and 'peer reviews catch 60 percent of the defects.' Such SE beliefs are particularly important in industry, because they are attention-getting, easily understandable, and thus practically useful. The authors examine the power of such SE beliefs to justify process improvements by empirically validating selected beliefs in relation to the increase or decrease of defects in system testing. They explore four basic SE beliefs in data from two midsize embedded software development organizations in Japan. Based on this information, they identify possible process improvements for each organization. The authors have determined that even small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can use this approach to find possible directions for improving their processes, which will result in better products.",
keywords = "Quality assurance, Software engineering, Software measurement, System testing",
author = "Akito Monden and Masateru Tsunoda and Mike Barker and Kenichi Matsumoto",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/MITP.2017.31",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "58--64",
journal = "IT Professional",
issn = "1520-9202",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Software Engineering Beliefs about System Testing Defects

AU - Monden, Akito

AU - Tsunoda, Masateru

AU - Barker, Mike

AU - Matsumoto, Kenichi

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Research findings are often expressed as short, startling sentences, or software engineering (SE) beliefs, such as 'about 80 percent of the defects come from 20 percent of the modules' and 'peer reviews catch 60 percent of the defects.' Such SE beliefs are particularly important in industry, because they are attention-getting, easily understandable, and thus practically useful. The authors examine the power of such SE beliefs to justify process improvements by empirically validating selected beliefs in relation to the increase or decrease of defects in system testing. They explore four basic SE beliefs in data from two midsize embedded software development organizations in Japan. Based on this information, they identify possible process improvements for each organization. The authors have determined that even small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can use this approach to find possible directions for improving their processes, which will result in better products.

AB - Research findings are often expressed as short, startling sentences, or software engineering (SE) beliefs, such as 'about 80 percent of the defects come from 20 percent of the modules' and 'peer reviews catch 60 percent of the defects.' Such SE beliefs are particularly important in industry, because they are attention-getting, easily understandable, and thus practically useful. The authors examine the power of such SE beliefs to justify process improvements by empirically validating selected beliefs in relation to the increase or decrease of defects in system testing. They explore four basic SE beliefs in data from two midsize embedded software development organizations in Japan. Based on this information, they identify possible process improvements for each organization. The authors have determined that even small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can use this approach to find possible directions for improving their processes, which will result in better products.

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Software engineering

KW - Software measurement

KW - System testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018795493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018795493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/MITP.2017.31

DO - 10.1109/MITP.2017.31

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018795493

VL - 19

SP - 58

EP - 64

JO - IT Professional

JF - IT Professional

SN - 1520-9202

IS - 2

M1 - 7914576

ER -