Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation

Bruna Marin Fronza, Patricia Makishi, Alireza Sadr, Yasushi Shimada, Yasunori Sumi, Junji Tagami, Marcelo Giannini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate microtensile bond strength (MTBS) and interfacial adaptation (IA) of bulk-fill restorative systems bonded to dentin in Class-I-preparations. Box-shaped preparations (4-mm-long, 3-mm-wide, 2-mm-high) made in extracted molars, and Teflon matrix with the same dimensions positioned over the occlusal surface were restored, providing a total of 4-mm composite depth using three bulk-fill restorative systems: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill with Tetric N-Bond (TEC/TNB), SureFil SDR Flow with XP Bond (SDR/XPB) and Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative with Scotchbond Universal (FBF/SBU); or incrementally restored with a conventional restorative system: Herculite Classic with OptiBond FL (HER/OBF). The specimens were sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured after 24-hours or one-year storage. For evaluation of IA, round-tapered tooth preparations (3-mm-diameter, 1.5-mm-deep) were made, restored with each material and their cross-sectional images were obtained after 24-hours using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The gap percentage for each restoration system was calculated using image analysis software. MTBS for both storage periods: HER/OBF=TEC/TNB=SDR/XPB>FBF/SBU (ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, P<0.05) differed significantly among groups, which values were significantly reduced after one-year. SDR/XPB showed comparatively lesser gap formation at the tooth-interface after 24 hours (ANOVA, Dunnett's T3 post-hoc, P<0.05). For deeper restorations, bond strength of TEC/TNB and SDR/XPB can be equal to that of HER/OBF after 24-hours and one-year; however, in a shallower preparation, SDR/XPB showed greater initial interfacial adaptation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e80
JournalBrazilian oral research
Volume32
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 6 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Analysis of Variance
Tooth Preparation
Optical Coherence Tomography
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Dentin
Tooth
Software
XP-Bond
OptiBond FL
Tetric EvoCeram
Tetric
Surefil SDR Flow
Scotchbond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of bulk-fill systems : microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation. / Fronza, Bruna Marin; Makishi, Patricia; Sadr, Alireza; Shimada, Yasushi; Sumi, Yasunori; Tagami, Junji; Giannini, Marcelo.

In: Brazilian oral research, Vol. 32, 06.08.2018, p. e80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fronza, Bruna Marin ; Makishi, Patricia ; Sadr, Alireza ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Sumi, Yasunori ; Tagami, Junji ; Giannini, Marcelo. / Evaluation of bulk-fill systems : microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation. In: Brazilian oral research. 2018 ; Vol. 32. pp. e80.
@article{632120bc52e344a4b02441958b1c1c21,
title = "Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to investigate microtensile bond strength (MTBS) and interfacial adaptation (IA) of bulk-fill restorative systems bonded to dentin in Class-I-preparations. Box-shaped preparations (4-mm-long, 3-mm-wide, 2-mm-high) made in extracted molars, and Teflon matrix with the same dimensions positioned over the occlusal surface were restored, providing a total of 4-mm composite depth using three bulk-fill restorative systems: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill with Tetric N-Bond (TEC/TNB), SureFil SDR Flow with XP Bond (SDR/XPB) and Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative with Scotchbond Universal (FBF/SBU); or incrementally restored with a conventional restorative system: Herculite Classic with OptiBond FL (HER/OBF). The specimens were sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured after 24-hours or one-year storage. For evaluation of IA, round-tapered tooth preparations (3-mm-diameter, 1.5-mm-deep) were made, restored with each material and their cross-sectional images were obtained after 24-hours using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The gap percentage for each restoration system was calculated using image analysis software. MTBS for both storage periods: HER/OBF=TEC/TNB=SDR/XPB>FBF/SBU (ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, P<0.05) differed significantly among groups, which values were significantly reduced after one-year. SDR/XPB showed comparatively lesser gap formation at the tooth-interface after 24 hours (ANOVA, Dunnett's T3 post-hoc, P<0.05). For deeper restorations, bond strength of TEC/TNB and SDR/XPB can be equal to that of HER/OBF after 24-hours and one-year; however, in a shallower preparation, SDR/XPB showed greater initial interfacial adaptation.",
author = "Fronza, {Bruna Marin} and Patricia Makishi and Alireza Sadr and Yasushi Shimada and Yasunori Sumi and Junji Tagami and Marcelo Giannini",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0080",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "e80",
journal = "Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research",
issn = "1517-7491",
publisher = "University of Sao Paolo",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of bulk-fill systems

T2 - microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation

AU - Fronza, Bruna Marin

AU - Makishi, Patricia

AU - Sadr, Alireza

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Sumi, Yasunori

AU - Tagami, Junji

AU - Giannini, Marcelo

PY - 2018/8/6

Y1 - 2018/8/6

N2 - The objective of this study was to investigate microtensile bond strength (MTBS) and interfacial adaptation (IA) of bulk-fill restorative systems bonded to dentin in Class-I-preparations. Box-shaped preparations (4-mm-long, 3-mm-wide, 2-mm-high) made in extracted molars, and Teflon matrix with the same dimensions positioned over the occlusal surface were restored, providing a total of 4-mm composite depth using three bulk-fill restorative systems: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill with Tetric N-Bond (TEC/TNB), SureFil SDR Flow with XP Bond (SDR/XPB) and Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative with Scotchbond Universal (FBF/SBU); or incrementally restored with a conventional restorative system: Herculite Classic with OptiBond FL (HER/OBF). The specimens were sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured after 24-hours or one-year storage. For evaluation of IA, round-tapered tooth preparations (3-mm-diameter, 1.5-mm-deep) were made, restored with each material and their cross-sectional images were obtained after 24-hours using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The gap percentage for each restoration system was calculated using image analysis software. MTBS for both storage periods: HER/OBF=TEC/TNB=SDR/XPB>FBF/SBU (ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, P<0.05) differed significantly among groups, which values were significantly reduced after one-year. SDR/XPB showed comparatively lesser gap formation at the tooth-interface after 24 hours (ANOVA, Dunnett's T3 post-hoc, P<0.05). For deeper restorations, bond strength of TEC/TNB and SDR/XPB can be equal to that of HER/OBF after 24-hours and one-year; however, in a shallower preparation, SDR/XPB showed greater initial interfacial adaptation.

AB - The objective of this study was to investigate microtensile bond strength (MTBS) and interfacial adaptation (IA) of bulk-fill restorative systems bonded to dentin in Class-I-preparations. Box-shaped preparations (4-mm-long, 3-mm-wide, 2-mm-high) made in extracted molars, and Teflon matrix with the same dimensions positioned over the occlusal surface were restored, providing a total of 4-mm composite depth using three bulk-fill restorative systems: Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill with Tetric N-Bond (TEC/TNB), SureFil SDR Flow with XP Bond (SDR/XPB) and Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative with Scotchbond Universal (FBF/SBU); or incrementally restored with a conventional restorative system: Herculite Classic with OptiBond FL (HER/OBF). The specimens were sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured after 24-hours or one-year storage. For evaluation of IA, round-tapered tooth preparations (3-mm-diameter, 1.5-mm-deep) were made, restored with each material and their cross-sectional images were obtained after 24-hours using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The gap percentage for each restoration system was calculated using image analysis software. MTBS for both storage periods: HER/OBF=TEC/TNB=SDR/XPB>FBF/SBU (ANOVA, Tukey's post-hoc, P<0.05) differed significantly among groups, which values were significantly reduced after one-year. SDR/XPB showed comparatively lesser gap formation at the tooth-interface after 24 hours (ANOVA, Dunnett's T3 post-hoc, P<0.05). For deeper restorations, bond strength of TEC/TNB and SDR/XPB can be equal to that of HER/OBF after 24-hours and one-year; however, in a shallower preparation, SDR/XPB showed greater initial interfacial adaptation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051508997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051508997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0080

DO - 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0080

M3 - Article

C2 - 30088553

AN - SCOPUS:85051508997

VL - 32

SP - e80

JO - Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research

JF - Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research

SN - 1517-7491

ER -