Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Groundwater contamination by nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) has become a serious environmental issue. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the NAPL content (θNAPL) in saturated soil to detect and monitor the NAPL contamination in groundwater. The objective of this study was to investigate three estimation methods for the θNAPL in saturated sandy soil, namely, the noncalibration method (NCM), the permittivity regression method (PRM), and the best-fit α method (BFαM). These methods utilize the permittivity (K) measured by amplitude domain reflectometry (ADR) and two dielectric mixing models: a theoretical Maxell-de Loor (MD) model and an empirical α model. The NCM applies the measured K to the models directly. The PRM applies the measured K to the models indirectly using the regression equation between the measured and estimated K. The RMSEs of the NCM for the α model were 0.038 m3 m-3 for light NAPL (LNAPL) and 0.015 m3 m-3 for dense NAPL (DNAPL) when the constant α value was set at 0.5. The RMSEs of the MD model, however, were 0.090 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.070 m3 m -3 for DNAPL. Using the PRM, the RMSEs of the MD model became much better than those of the NCM. The RMSEs for θNAPL estimated by the BFαM were 0.007 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.018 m3 m-3 for DNAPL. These results demonstrate that θNAPL was estimated easily and with sufficient accuracy with the α model and the PRM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1520-1526
Number of pages7
JournalSoil Science Society of America Journal
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2008

Fingerprint

reflectometry
nonaqueous phase liquids
nonaqueous phase liquid
sandy soil
sandy soils
permittivity
methodology
groundwater contamination
dense nonaqueous phase liquids
method
groundwater
estimation method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry. / Moroizumi, Toshitsugu; Sasaki, Yumi.

In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 72, No. 6, 11.2008, p. 1520-1526.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e440daad9b884174b6274342cc881bc6,
title = "Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry",
abstract = "Groundwater contamination by nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) has become a serious environmental issue. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the NAPL content (θNAPL) in saturated soil to detect and monitor the NAPL contamination in groundwater. The objective of this study was to investigate three estimation methods for the θNAPL in saturated sandy soil, namely, the noncalibration method (NCM), the permittivity regression method (PRM), and the best-fit α method (BFαM). These methods utilize the permittivity (K) measured by amplitude domain reflectometry (ADR) and two dielectric mixing models: a theoretical Maxell-de Loor (MD) model and an empirical α model. The NCM applies the measured K to the models directly. The PRM applies the measured K to the models indirectly using the regression equation between the measured and estimated K. The RMSEs of the NCM for the α model were 0.038 m3 m-3 for light NAPL (LNAPL) and 0.015 m3 m-3 for dense NAPL (DNAPL) when the constant α value was set at 0.5. The RMSEs of the MD model, however, were 0.090 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.070 m3 m -3 for DNAPL. Using the PRM, the RMSEs of the MD model became much better than those of the NCM. The RMSEs for θNAPL estimated by the BFαM were 0.007 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.018 m3 m-3 for DNAPL. These results demonstrate that θNAPL was estimated easily and with sufficient accuracy with the α model and the PRM.",
author = "Toshitsugu Moroizumi and Yumi Sasaki",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2136/sssaj2006.0212",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "1520--1526",
journal = "Soil Science Society of America Journal",
issn = "0361-5995",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the nonaqueous-phase liquid content in saturated sandy soil using amplitude domain reflectometry

AU - Moroizumi, Toshitsugu

AU - Sasaki, Yumi

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Groundwater contamination by nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) has become a serious environmental issue. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the NAPL content (θNAPL) in saturated soil to detect and monitor the NAPL contamination in groundwater. The objective of this study was to investigate three estimation methods for the θNAPL in saturated sandy soil, namely, the noncalibration method (NCM), the permittivity regression method (PRM), and the best-fit α method (BFαM). These methods utilize the permittivity (K) measured by amplitude domain reflectometry (ADR) and two dielectric mixing models: a theoretical Maxell-de Loor (MD) model and an empirical α model. The NCM applies the measured K to the models directly. The PRM applies the measured K to the models indirectly using the regression equation between the measured and estimated K. The RMSEs of the NCM for the α model were 0.038 m3 m-3 for light NAPL (LNAPL) and 0.015 m3 m-3 for dense NAPL (DNAPL) when the constant α value was set at 0.5. The RMSEs of the MD model, however, were 0.090 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.070 m3 m -3 for DNAPL. Using the PRM, the RMSEs of the MD model became much better than those of the NCM. The RMSEs for θNAPL estimated by the BFαM were 0.007 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.018 m3 m-3 for DNAPL. These results demonstrate that θNAPL was estimated easily and with sufficient accuracy with the α model and the PRM.

AB - Groundwater contamination by nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) has become a serious environmental issue. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the NAPL content (θNAPL) in saturated soil to detect and monitor the NAPL contamination in groundwater. The objective of this study was to investigate three estimation methods for the θNAPL in saturated sandy soil, namely, the noncalibration method (NCM), the permittivity regression method (PRM), and the best-fit α method (BFαM). These methods utilize the permittivity (K) measured by amplitude domain reflectometry (ADR) and two dielectric mixing models: a theoretical Maxell-de Loor (MD) model and an empirical α model. The NCM applies the measured K to the models directly. The PRM applies the measured K to the models indirectly using the regression equation between the measured and estimated K. The RMSEs of the NCM for the α model were 0.038 m3 m-3 for light NAPL (LNAPL) and 0.015 m3 m-3 for dense NAPL (DNAPL) when the constant α value was set at 0.5. The RMSEs of the MD model, however, were 0.090 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.070 m3 m -3 for DNAPL. Using the PRM, the RMSEs of the MD model became much better than those of the NCM. The RMSEs for θNAPL estimated by the BFαM were 0.007 m3 m-3 for LNAPL and 0.018 m3 m-3 for DNAPL. These results demonstrate that θNAPL was estimated easily and with sufficient accuracy with the α model and the PRM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56749103413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=56749103413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2006.0212

DO - 10.2136/sssaj2006.0212

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:56749103413

VL - 72

SP - 1520

EP - 1526

JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal

JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal

SN - 0361-5995

IS - 6

ER -