Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives

Chooi Mei Mah, Takeshi Fujiwara, Chin Siong Ho

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arises mainly as by-products of rapid urbanisation activities. C&DW materials have high potential for recycling and reusing. Despite its potential, landfilling is still the most common disposal method. In Malaysia, C&DW practices are principally guided by economic incentives such as low disposal cost or inexpensive virgin material outweighing recycling cost resulting in low recycling rate. The purpose of this study is to access the environmental impacts caused by landfilling and the alternatives especially in assessing the damages to human health, ecosystems, and to the resources in the future 10 y. It aims to identify the better alternatives in reducing the environmental impacts of landfilling C&DW. Life cycle assessment (LCA) used in this study assessed the environmental impacts associated with all stages, from waste production to end-of-life of waste material. LCA can help to avoid the short-sighted, quick-fix landfilling as the main solution for C&DW by systematically compiling an inventory of energy, fuel, material inputs, and environmental outputs. The environmental impact of landfilling C&DW is estimated to increase 20.2 % if the business as usual (BaU) landfilling continues to the year 2025. Recycling will reduce 46.0 % of total damages and with the shorter travel distance, the environmental damage is further reduced by 82.3 %. Applying industrial building system (IBS) to reduce waste generation at-site reduced 98.1 % impacts as compared to landfilling scenario. The negative impacts derived from landfilling activity is significantly reduced by 99.5 % (scenario 8) through shifting to IBS, recycling, and shorter the travel distance from construction sites to material recycling facilities (MRF). The what-if scenarios illustrated the alternatives future circumstances, the inclusion of the uncertainty concept, and define the future path of C&DW industry outlook. The outcome of this study is informative and useful to policymakers, particularly in defining the way forward of C&DW industry in Malaysia.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationChemical Engineering Transactions
PublisherItalian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC
Pages343-348
Number of pages6
Volume63
ISBN (Electronic)9788895608617
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Demolition
Waste management
Environmental impact
Recycling
Life cycle
Industry
Ecosystems
Byproducts
Costs
Health
Economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Mah, C. M., Fujiwara, T., & Ho, C. S. (2018). Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives. In Chemical Engineering Transactions (Vol. 63, pp. 343-348). Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863058

Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives. / Mah, Chooi Mei; Fujiwara, Takeshi; Ho, Chin Siong.

Chemical Engineering Transactions. Vol. 63 Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC, 2018. p. 343-348.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Mah, CM, Fujiwara, T & Ho, CS 2018, Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives. in Chemical Engineering Transactions. vol. 63, Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC, pp. 343-348. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863058
Mah CM, Fujiwara T, Ho CS. Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives. In Chemical Engineering Transactions. Vol. 63. Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC. 2018. p. 343-348 https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863058
Mah, Chooi Mei ; Fujiwara, Takeshi ; Ho, Chin Siong. / Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives. Chemical Engineering Transactions. Vol. 63 Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC, 2018. pp. 343-348
@inbook{4a508aa56b5843eda142451ba01a8152,
title = "Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives",
abstract = "Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arises mainly as by-products of rapid urbanisation activities. C&DW materials have high potential for recycling and reusing. Despite its potential, landfilling is still the most common disposal method. In Malaysia, C&DW practices are principally guided by economic incentives such as low disposal cost or inexpensive virgin material outweighing recycling cost resulting in low recycling rate. The purpose of this study is to access the environmental impacts caused by landfilling and the alternatives especially in assessing the damages to human health, ecosystems, and to the resources in the future 10 y. It aims to identify the better alternatives in reducing the environmental impacts of landfilling C&DW. Life cycle assessment (LCA) used in this study assessed the environmental impacts associated with all stages, from waste production to end-of-life of waste material. LCA can help to avoid the short-sighted, quick-fix landfilling as the main solution for C&DW by systematically compiling an inventory of energy, fuel, material inputs, and environmental outputs. The environmental impact of landfilling C&DW is estimated to increase 20.2 {\%} if the business as usual (BaU) landfilling continues to the year 2025. Recycling will reduce 46.0 {\%} of total damages and with the shorter travel distance, the environmental damage is further reduced by 82.3 {\%}. Applying industrial building system (IBS) to reduce waste generation at-site reduced 98.1 {\%} impacts as compared to landfilling scenario. The negative impacts derived from landfilling activity is significantly reduced by 99.5 {\%} (scenario 8) through shifting to IBS, recycling, and shorter the travel distance from construction sites to material recycling facilities (MRF). The what-if scenarios illustrated the alternatives future circumstances, the inclusion of the uncertainty concept, and define the future path of C&DW industry outlook. The outcome of this study is informative and useful to policymakers, particularly in defining the way forward of C&DW industry in Malaysia.",
author = "Mah, {Chooi Mei} and Takeshi Fujiwara and Ho, {Chin Siong}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3303/CET1863058",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "343--348",
booktitle = "Chemical Engineering Transactions",
publisher = "Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Environmental impacts of construction and demolition waste management alternatives

AU - Mah, Chooi Mei

AU - Fujiwara, Takeshi

AU - Ho, Chin Siong

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arises mainly as by-products of rapid urbanisation activities. C&DW materials have high potential for recycling and reusing. Despite its potential, landfilling is still the most common disposal method. In Malaysia, C&DW practices are principally guided by economic incentives such as low disposal cost or inexpensive virgin material outweighing recycling cost resulting in low recycling rate. The purpose of this study is to access the environmental impacts caused by landfilling and the alternatives especially in assessing the damages to human health, ecosystems, and to the resources in the future 10 y. It aims to identify the better alternatives in reducing the environmental impacts of landfilling C&DW. Life cycle assessment (LCA) used in this study assessed the environmental impacts associated with all stages, from waste production to end-of-life of waste material. LCA can help to avoid the short-sighted, quick-fix landfilling as the main solution for C&DW by systematically compiling an inventory of energy, fuel, material inputs, and environmental outputs. The environmental impact of landfilling C&DW is estimated to increase 20.2 % if the business as usual (BaU) landfilling continues to the year 2025. Recycling will reduce 46.0 % of total damages and with the shorter travel distance, the environmental damage is further reduced by 82.3 %. Applying industrial building system (IBS) to reduce waste generation at-site reduced 98.1 % impacts as compared to landfilling scenario. The negative impacts derived from landfilling activity is significantly reduced by 99.5 % (scenario 8) through shifting to IBS, recycling, and shorter the travel distance from construction sites to material recycling facilities (MRF). The what-if scenarios illustrated the alternatives future circumstances, the inclusion of the uncertainty concept, and define the future path of C&DW industry outlook. The outcome of this study is informative and useful to policymakers, particularly in defining the way forward of C&DW industry in Malaysia.

AB - Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) arises mainly as by-products of rapid urbanisation activities. C&DW materials have high potential for recycling and reusing. Despite its potential, landfilling is still the most common disposal method. In Malaysia, C&DW practices are principally guided by economic incentives such as low disposal cost or inexpensive virgin material outweighing recycling cost resulting in low recycling rate. The purpose of this study is to access the environmental impacts caused by landfilling and the alternatives especially in assessing the damages to human health, ecosystems, and to the resources in the future 10 y. It aims to identify the better alternatives in reducing the environmental impacts of landfilling C&DW. Life cycle assessment (LCA) used in this study assessed the environmental impacts associated with all stages, from waste production to end-of-life of waste material. LCA can help to avoid the short-sighted, quick-fix landfilling as the main solution for C&DW by systematically compiling an inventory of energy, fuel, material inputs, and environmental outputs. The environmental impact of landfilling C&DW is estimated to increase 20.2 % if the business as usual (BaU) landfilling continues to the year 2025. Recycling will reduce 46.0 % of total damages and with the shorter travel distance, the environmental damage is further reduced by 82.3 %. Applying industrial building system (IBS) to reduce waste generation at-site reduced 98.1 % impacts as compared to landfilling scenario. The negative impacts derived from landfilling activity is significantly reduced by 99.5 % (scenario 8) through shifting to IBS, recycling, and shorter the travel distance from construction sites to material recycling facilities (MRF). The what-if scenarios illustrated the alternatives future circumstances, the inclusion of the uncertainty concept, and define the future path of C&DW industry outlook. The outcome of this study is informative and useful to policymakers, particularly in defining the way forward of C&DW industry in Malaysia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047307856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047307856&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3303/CET1863058

DO - 10.3303/CET1863058

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85047307856

VL - 63

SP - 343

EP - 348

BT - Chemical Engineering Transactions

PB - Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC

ER -