Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002

Martin G. Mlynczak, Javier Martin-Torres, Geoff Crowley, David P. Kratz, Bernd Funke, Gang Lu, Manuel Lopez-Puertas, James M. Russell, Janet Kozyra, Chris Mertens, Ramesh Sharma, Larry Gordley, Richard Picard, Jeremy Winick, Larry Paxton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

[1]The dramatic solar storm events of April 2002 deposited a large amount of energy into the Earth's upper atmosphere, substantially altering the thermal structure, the chemical composition, the dynamics, and the radiative environment. We examine the flow of energy within the thermosphere during this storm period from the perspective of infrared radiation transport and heat conduction. Observations from the SABER instrument on the TIMED satellite are coupled with computations based on the ASPEN thermospheric general circulation model to assess the energy flow. The dominant radiative response is associated with dramatically enhanced infrared emission from nitric oxide at 5.3 μm from which a total of ∼7.7 × 1023 ergs of energy are radiated during the storm. Energy loss rates due to NO emission exceed 2200 Kelvin per day. In contrast, energy loss from carbon dioxide emission at 15 μm is only ∼2.3% that of nitric oxide. Atomic oxygen emission at 63 μm is essentially constant during the storm. Energy loss from molecular heat conduction may be as large as 3.8% of the NO emission. These results confirm the “natural thermostat” effect of nitric oxide emission as the primary mechanism by which storm energy is lost from the thermosphere below 210 km.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
Volume110
Issue numberA12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

solar storms
thermosphere
energy
nitric oxide
Energy dissipation
Nitric Oxide
Heat conduction
energy dissipation
energy flow
heat
conductive heat transfer
Infrared radiation
Thermostats
thermostats
Upper atmosphere
infrared radiation
General Circulation Models
radiation transport
Carbon Dioxide
upper atmosphere

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Forestry
  • Oceanography
  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Soil Science
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002. / Mlynczak, Martin G.; Martin-Torres, Javier; Crowley, Geoff; Kratz, David P.; Funke, Bernd; Lu, Gang; Lopez-Puertas, Manuel; Russell, James M.; Kozyra, Janet; Mertens, Chris; Sharma, Ramesh; Gordley, Larry; Picard, Richard; Winick, Jeremy; Paxton, Larry.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 110, No. A12, 01.12.2005, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mlynczak, MG, Martin-Torres, J, Crowley, G, Kratz, DP, Funke, B, Lu, G, Lopez-Puertas, M, Russell, JM, Kozyra, J, Mertens, C, Sharma, R, Gordley, L, Picard, R, Winick, J & Paxton, L 2005, 'Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002', Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 110, no. A12, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011141
Mlynczak, Martin G. ; Martin-Torres, Javier ; Crowley, Geoff ; Kratz, David P. ; Funke, Bernd ; Lu, Gang ; Lopez-Puertas, Manuel ; Russell, James M. ; Kozyra, Janet ; Mertens, Chris ; Sharma, Ramesh ; Gordley, Larry ; Picard, Richard ; Winick, Jeremy ; Paxton, Larry. / Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002. In: Journal of Geophysical Research. 2005 ; Vol. 110, No. A12. pp. 1-19.
@article{35ae5d9a4cc94c8cad90c4cdb4b41cd8,
title = "Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002",
abstract = "[1]The dramatic solar storm events of April 2002 deposited a large amount of energy into the Earth's upper atmosphere, substantially altering the thermal structure, the chemical composition, the dynamics, and the radiative environment. We examine the flow of energy within the thermosphere during this storm period from the perspective of infrared radiation transport and heat conduction. Observations from the SABER instrument on the TIMED satellite are coupled with computations based on the ASPEN thermospheric general circulation model to assess the energy flow. The dominant radiative response is associated with dramatically enhanced infrared emission from nitric oxide at 5.3 μm from which a total of ∼7.7 × 1023 ergs of energy are radiated during the storm. Energy loss rates due to NO emission exceed 2200 Kelvin per day. In contrast, energy loss from carbon dioxide emission at 15 μm is only ∼2.3{\%} that of nitric oxide. Atomic oxygen emission at 63 μm is essentially constant during the storm. Energy loss from molecular heat conduction may be as large as 3.8{\%} of the NO emission. These results confirm the “natural thermostat” effect of nitric oxide emission as the primary mechanism by which storm energy is lost from the thermosphere below 210 km.",
author = "Mlynczak, {Martin G.} and Javier Martin-Torres and Geoff Crowley and Kratz, {David P.} and Bernd Funke and Gang Lu and Manuel Lopez-Puertas and Russell, {James M.} and Janet Kozyra and Chris Mertens and Ramesh Sharma and Larry Gordley and Richard Picard and Jeremy Winick and Larry Paxton",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2005JA011141",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
issn = "0148-0227",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "A12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Energy transport in the thermosphere during the solar storms of April 2002

AU - Mlynczak, Martin G.

AU - Martin-Torres, Javier

AU - Crowley, Geoff

AU - Kratz, David P.

AU - Funke, Bernd

AU - Lu, Gang

AU - Lopez-Puertas, Manuel

AU - Russell, James M.

AU - Kozyra, Janet

AU - Mertens, Chris

AU - Sharma, Ramesh

AU - Gordley, Larry

AU - Picard, Richard

AU - Winick, Jeremy

AU - Paxton, Larry

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - [1]The dramatic solar storm events of April 2002 deposited a large amount of energy into the Earth's upper atmosphere, substantially altering the thermal structure, the chemical composition, the dynamics, and the radiative environment. We examine the flow of energy within the thermosphere during this storm period from the perspective of infrared radiation transport and heat conduction. Observations from the SABER instrument on the TIMED satellite are coupled with computations based on the ASPEN thermospheric general circulation model to assess the energy flow. The dominant radiative response is associated with dramatically enhanced infrared emission from nitric oxide at 5.3 μm from which a total of ∼7.7 × 1023 ergs of energy are radiated during the storm. Energy loss rates due to NO emission exceed 2200 Kelvin per day. In contrast, energy loss from carbon dioxide emission at 15 μm is only ∼2.3% that of nitric oxide. Atomic oxygen emission at 63 μm is essentially constant during the storm. Energy loss from molecular heat conduction may be as large as 3.8% of the NO emission. These results confirm the “natural thermostat” effect of nitric oxide emission as the primary mechanism by which storm energy is lost from the thermosphere below 210 km.

AB - [1]The dramatic solar storm events of April 2002 deposited a large amount of energy into the Earth's upper atmosphere, substantially altering the thermal structure, the chemical composition, the dynamics, and the radiative environment. We examine the flow of energy within the thermosphere during this storm period from the perspective of infrared radiation transport and heat conduction. Observations from the SABER instrument on the TIMED satellite are coupled with computations based on the ASPEN thermospheric general circulation model to assess the energy flow. The dominant radiative response is associated with dramatically enhanced infrared emission from nitric oxide at 5.3 μm from which a total of ∼7.7 × 1023 ergs of energy are radiated during the storm. Energy loss rates due to NO emission exceed 2200 Kelvin per day. In contrast, energy loss from carbon dioxide emission at 15 μm is only ∼2.3% that of nitric oxide. Atomic oxygen emission at 63 μm is essentially constant during the storm. Energy loss from molecular heat conduction may be as large as 3.8% of the NO emission. These results confirm the “natural thermostat” effect of nitric oxide emission as the primary mechanism by which storm energy is lost from the thermosphere below 210 km.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845674289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845674289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2005JA011141

DO - 10.1029/2005JA011141

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845674289

VL - 110

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research

SN - 0148-0227

IS - A12

ER -