Effectiveness of using low rate fluoroscopy to reduce an examiner's radiation dose during lumbar nerve root block

Kentaro Yamane, Nobuo Kai, Tetsuro Mazaki, Tadashi Miyamoto, Tomohiro Matsushita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Long-term exposure to radiation can lead to gene mutations and increase the risk of cancer. Low rate fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce the radiation exposure for both the examiner and the patient during various fluoroscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of low rate fluoroscopy on reducing an examiner's radiation dose during nerve root block. Methods: A total of 101 lumbar nerve root block examinations were performed at our institute during a 6-month period. During the first 3 months, low rate fluoroscopy was performed at 7.5 frames/s (FPS) in 54 examinations, while 47 were performed at 15 FPS during the last 3 months. The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective and equivalent doses for the hands, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results: The mean monthly equivalent doses were significantly lower both inside and outside the hand protector for the 7.5 FPS versus 15 FPS (inside; P = 0.021, outside; P = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the two groups for the mean monthly calculated effective dose for each protector's condition. Conclusions: Radiation exposure was significantly reduced for the skin on the examiner's hand when using low rate fluoroscopy at 7.5 FPS, with no noticeable decrease in image quality or prolonged fluoroscopy time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-743
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Science
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nerve Block
Fluoroscopy
Radiation
Radiation Protection
Hand
Luminescence
Torso
Skin
Glass
Neck
Mutation
Genes
Radiation Exposure
Radiation Dosimeters
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Effectiveness of using low rate fluoroscopy to reduce an examiner's radiation dose during lumbar nerve root block. / Yamane, Kentaro; Kai, Nobuo; Mazaki, Tetsuro; Miyamoto, Tadashi; Matsushita, Tomohiro.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, 09.2018, p. 739-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamane, Kentaro ; Kai, Nobuo ; Mazaki, Tetsuro ; Miyamoto, Tadashi ; Matsushita, Tomohiro. / Effectiveness of using low rate fluoroscopy to reduce an examiner's radiation dose during lumbar nerve root block. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 739-743.
@article{c435fdf2bf2542049c18fa204b7a3008,
title = "Effectiveness of using low rate fluoroscopy to reduce an examiner's radiation dose during lumbar nerve root block",
abstract = "Background: Long-term exposure to radiation can lead to gene mutations and increase the risk of cancer. Low rate fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce the radiation exposure for both the examiner and the patient during various fluoroscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of low rate fluoroscopy on reducing an examiner's radiation dose during nerve root block. Methods: A total of 101 lumbar nerve root block examinations were performed at our institute during a 6-month period. During the first 3 months, low rate fluoroscopy was performed at 7.5 frames/s (FPS) in 54 examinations, while 47 were performed at 15 FPS during the last 3 months. The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective and equivalent doses for the hands, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results: The mean monthly equivalent doses were significantly lower both inside and outside the hand protector for the 7.5 FPS versus 15 FPS (inside; P = 0.021, outside; P = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the two groups for the mean monthly calculated effective dose for each protector's condition. Conclusions: Radiation exposure was significantly reduced for the skin on the examiner's hand when using low rate fluoroscopy at 7.5 FPS, with no noticeable decrease in image quality or prolonged fluoroscopy time.",
author = "Kentaro Yamane and Nobuo Kai and Tetsuro Mazaki and Tadashi Miyamoto and Tomohiro Matsushita",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "739--743",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Science",
issn = "0949-2658",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of using low rate fluoroscopy to reduce an examiner's radiation dose during lumbar nerve root block

AU - Yamane, Kentaro

AU - Kai, Nobuo

AU - Mazaki, Tetsuro

AU - Miyamoto, Tadashi

AU - Matsushita, Tomohiro

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Background: Long-term exposure to radiation can lead to gene mutations and increase the risk of cancer. Low rate fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce the radiation exposure for both the examiner and the patient during various fluoroscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of low rate fluoroscopy on reducing an examiner's radiation dose during nerve root block. Methods: A total of 101 lumbar nerve root block examinations were performed at our institute during a 6-month period. During the first 3 months, low rate fluoroscopy was performed at 7.5 frames/s (FPS) in 54 examinations, while 47 were performed at 15 FPS during the last 3 months. The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective and equivalent doses for the hands, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results: The mean monthly equivalent doses were significantly lower both inside and outside the hand protector for the 7.5 FPS versus 15 FPS (inside; P = 0.021, outside; P = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the two groups for the mean monthly calculated effective dose for each protector's condition. Conclusions: Radiation exposure was significantly reduced for the skin on the examiner's hand when using low rate fluoroscopy at 7.5 FPS, with no noticeable decrease in image quality or prolonged fluoroscopy time.

AB - Background: Long-term exposure to radiation can lead to gene mutations and increase the risk of cancer. Low rate fluoroscopy has the potential to reduce the radiation exposure for both the examiner and the patient during various fluoroscopic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of low rate fluoroscopy on reducing an examiner's radiation dose during nerve root block. Methods: A total of 101 lumbar nerve root block examinations were performed at our institute during a 6-month period. During the first 3 months, low rate fluoroscopy was performed at 7.5 frames/s (FPS) in 54 examinations, while 47 were performed at 15 FPS during the last 3 months. The examiner wore a torso protector, a neck protector, radiation protection gloves, and radiation protection glasses. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter badges were placed on both the inside and the outside of each protector. The dosimeters were exchanged every month. Radiation doses (mSv) were measured as the integrated radiation quantity every month from the OSL dosimeters. The effective and equivalent doses for the hands, skin, and eyes were investigated. Results: The mean monthly equivalent doses were significantly lower both inside and outside the hand protector for the 7.5 FPS versus 15 FPS (inside; P = 0.021, outside; P = 0.024). There were no significant differences between the two groups for the mean monthly calculated effective dose for each protector's condition. Conclusions: Radiation exposure was significantly reduced for the skin on the examiner's hand when using low rate fluoroscopy at 7.5 FPS, with no noticeable decrease in image quality or prolonged fluoroscopy time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048452877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048452877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2018.05.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 29909125

AN - SCOPUS:85048452877

VL - 23

SP - 739

EP - 743

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science

SN - 0949-2658

IS - 5

ER -