Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives

Shenghua Wei, Alireza Sadr, Yasushi Shimada, Junji Tagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of three current adhesives to normal and caries-affected dentin, and to examine the correlation between dentin nanoindentation hardness and bond strength. Materials and Methods: Nanoindentation hardness of dentin and microshear bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond, Clerafil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Medical) and Single Bond (3M ESPE) were measured on caries-affected and normal dentin. Modes of fracture for the bonding tests and the resin/dentin interfaces were observed using SEM. Data were analyzed at a statistical significance level of p <0.05. Results: Significantly lower hardness values were recorded for caries-affected dentin compared to normal dentin. Two-way ANOVA showed that bonding material, type of dentin, and the interactions of these two factors had significant effects on bond strength. A significant correlation was found between dentin hardness and microshear bond strength. However, ANCOVA analysis revealed that the effect of dentin type was not only due to the mechanical properties of dentin. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test revealed that the mean bond strength of normal dentin with Tri-S Bond was significantly lower than that with SE Bond and Single Bond; however, bond strengths to caries-affected dentin showed no significant difference between the three adhesives. Conclusion: All three adhesives showed lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin than to normal dentin. The differences between adhesives were not significant with caries-affected dentin as the bonding substrate. Dentin mechanical properties are not the only factors responsible for lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-440
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shear Strength
Hardness
Dentin
Adhesives
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Caries-affected dentin
  • Etch-and-rinse adhesive
  • Microshear bond strength
  • Nanoindentation
  • Self-etching adhesive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives. / Wei, Shenghua; Sadr, Alireza; Shimada, Yasushi; Tagami, Junji.

In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008, p. 431-440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wei, Shenghua ; Sadr, Alireza ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Tagami, Junji. / Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives. In: Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2008 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 431-440.
@article{d520bf16f732441f85a2cd7bb35be164,
title = "Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of three current adhesives to normal and caries-affected dentin, and to examine the correlation between dentin nanoindentation hardness and bond strength. Materials and Methods: Nanoindentation hardness of dentin and microshear bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond, Clerafil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Medical) and Single Bond (3M ESPE) were measured on caries-affected and normal dentin. Modes of fracture for the bonding tests and the resin/dentin interfaces were observed using SEM. Data were analyzed at a statistical significance level of p <0.05. Results: Significantly lower hardness values were recorded for caries-affected dentin compared to normal dentin. Two-way ANOVA showed that bonding material, type of dentin, and the interactions of these two factors had significant effects on bond strength. A significant correlation was found between dentin hardness and microshear bond strength. However, ANCOVA analysis revealed that the effect of dentin type was not only due to the mechanical properties of dentin. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test revealed that the mean bond strength of normal dentin with Tri-S Bond was significantly lower than that with SE Bond and Single Bond; however, bond strengths to caries-affected dentin showed no significant difference between the three adhesives. Conclusion: All three adhesives showed lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin than to normal dentin. The differences between adhesives were not significant with caries-affected dentin as the bonding substrate. Dentin mechanical properties are not the only factors responsible for lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin.",
keywords = "Caries-affected dentin, Etch-and-rinse adhesive, Microshear bond strength, Nanoindentation, Self-etching adhesive",
author = "Shenghua Wei and Alireza Sadr and Yasushi Shimada and Junji Tagami",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.3290/j.jad.a14145",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "431--440",
journal = "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry",
issn = "1461-5185",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of caries-affected dentin hardness on the shear bond strength of current adhesives

AU - Wei, Shenghua

AU - Sadr, Alireza

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Tagami, Junji

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of three current adhesives to normal and caries-affected dentin, and to examine the correlation between dentin nanoindentation hardness and bond strength. Materials and Methods: Nanoindentation hardness of dentin and microshear bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond, Clerafil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Medical) and Single Bond (3M ESPE) were measured on caries-affected and normal dentin. Modes of fracture for the bonding tests and the resin/dentin interfaces were observed using SEM. Data were analyzed at a statistical significance level of p <0.05. Results: Significantly lower hardness values were recorded for caries-affected dentin compared to normal dentin. Two-way ANOVA showed that bonding material, type of dentin, and the interactions of these two factors had significant effects on bond strength. A significant correlation was found between dentin hardness and microshear bond strength. However, ANCOVA analysis revealed that the effect of dentin type was not only due to the mechanical properties of dentin. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test revealed that the mean bond strength of normal dentin with Tri-S Bond was significantly lower than that with SE Bond and Single Bond; however, bond strengths to caries-affected dentin showed no significant difference between the three adhesives. Conclusion: All three adhesives showed lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin than to normal dentin. The differences between adhesives were not significant with caries-affected dentin as the bonding substrate. Dentin mechanical properties are not the only factors responsible for lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin.

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microshear bond strength of three current adhesives to normal and caries-affected dentin, and to examine the correlation between dentin nanoindentation hardness and bond strength. Materials and Methods: Nanoindentation hardness of dentin and microshear bond strength of Clearfil SE Bond, Clerafil Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Medical) and Single Bond (3M ESPE) were measured on caries-affected and normal dentin. Modes of fracture for the bonding tests and the resin/dentin interfaces were observed using SEM. Data were analyzed at a statistical significance level of p <0.05. Results: Significantly lower hardness values were recorded for caries-affected dentin compared to normal dentin. Two-way ANOVA showed that bonding material, type of dentin, and the interactions of these two factors had significant effects on bond strength. A significant correlation was found between dentin hardness and microshear bond strength. However, ANCOVA analysis revealed that the effect of dentin type was not only due to the mechanical properties of dentin. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test revealed that the mean bond strength of normal dentin with Tri-S Bond was significantly lower than that with SE Bond and Single Bond; however, bond strengths to caries-affected dentin showed no significant difference between the three adhesives. Conclusion: All three adhesives showed lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin than to normal dentin. The differences between adhesives were not significant with caries-affected dentin as the bonding substrate. Dentin mechanical properties are not the only factors responsible for lower bond strength to caries-affected dentin.

KW - Caries-affected dentin

KW - Etch-and-rinse adhesive

KW - Microshear bond strength

KW - Nanoindentation

KW - Self-etching adhesive

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65449153303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65449153303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3290/j.jad.a14145

DO - 10.3290/j.jad.a14145

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 431

EP - 440

JO - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

JF - Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

SN - 1461-5185

IS - 6

ER -