Economic, water and energy evaluation of early rejection of gangue from copper ores using a dry sand fluidised bed separator

George V. Franks, Elizaveta Forbes, Jun Oshitani, Robin J. Batterham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The implications of adding a dry sand fluid bed (DSFB) separator for early rejection of gangue from copper ore on the economic outcomes as well as energy and water consumed have been analysed. The analysis included capital and operating costs and considered the consequence of loss of valuable copper to the tails. Two types of copper ores with different mass-density and copper-density distributions were analysed. Energy and water can be saved using the DSFB to reject gangue early but the loss of valuable copper makes the revised flow sheet uneconomical. If the low density ore rejected by the DSFB is sent to heap leaching, both reduced water and energy consumption as well as increased profit are possible for one of the ores. In order for the DSFB to be useful in increasing profit, the ore should have copper content a strong function of density (greater than linear). This type of ore is amenable to processing by DSFB and heap leaching, because a large fraction of the feed can be sent directly to heap leaching rather than being ground resulting in significant reduction in energy and water consumption with minimal loss (or even slightly improved) recovery of copper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-51
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Mineral Processing
Volume137
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 10 2015

Keywords

  • Copper
  • Dry processing
  • Early gangue rejection
  • Energy
  • Profitability
  • Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Economic, water and energy evaluation of early rejection of gangue from copper ores using a dry sand fluidised bed separator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this