Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT

Motoharu Sasaki, Hitoshi Ikushima, Masahide Tominaga, Takeshi Kamomae, Taro Kishi, Masataka Oita, Masafumi Harada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we compared the dose impact of the heterogeneity caused by rectal gas using two methods of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods: In addition to the structure set used for the standard treatment plan, we created a structure set for evaluation for each patient. These sets were transferred to the same isocenter as the respective treatment plans for IMRT and VMAT that were to become the standard. Values were then recalculated. Results: During the standard prostatic IMRT and VMAT treatment planning, all study participants met dose restrictions in place at our hospital. Dose restrictions were fulfilled in treatment plans for evaluation, excluding those with a clinical target volume (CTV) of V100 % and planning target volume (PTV) of D95 when the rectum was excluded. However, in treatment plans for evaluation, IMRT was shown to have a higher concordance rate with standard treatment plans than VMAT. Conclusion: If rectal gas is present during either IMRT or VMAT, a dose decrease will occur in relation to CTV and PTV, suggesting that a plan does not eliminate adverse effects on organs at risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723-733
Number of pages11
JournalJapanese Journal of Radiology
Volume33
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Gases
Therapeutics
Organs at Risk
Rectum

Keywords

  • Dose distribution
  • Gas
  • Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Volumetric-modulated arc therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Sasaki, M., Ikushima, H., Tominaga, M., Kamomae, T., Kishi, T., Oita, M., & Harada, M. (2015). Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 33(12), 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7

Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT. / Sasaki, Motoharu; Ikushima, Hitoshi; Tominaga, Masahide; Kamomae, Takeshi; Kishi, Taro; Oita, Masataka; Harada, Masafumi.

In: Japanese Journal of Radiology, Vol. 33, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 723-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sasaki, M, Ikushima, H, Tominaga, M, Kamomae, T, Kishi, T, Oita, M & Harada, M 2015, 'Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT', Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7
Sasaki M, Ikushima H, Tominaga M, Kamomae T, Kishi T, Oita M et al. Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2015 Dec 1;33(12):723-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7
Sasaki, Motoharu ; Ikushima, Hitoshi ; Tominaga, Masahide ; Kamomae, Takeshi ; Kishi, Taro ; Oita, Masataka ; Harada, Masafumi. / Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT. In: Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 12. pp. 723-733.
@article{f42edadc50014eeaa4b6832419263857,
title = "Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT",
abstract = "Purpose: In this study, we compared the dose impact of the heterogeneity caused by rectal gas using two methods of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods: In addition to the structure set used for the standard treatment plan, we created a structure set for evaluation for each patient. These sets were transferred to the same isocenter as the respective treatment plans for IMRT and VMAT that were to become the standard. Values were then recalculated. Results: During the standard prostatic IMRT and VMAT treatment planning, all study participants met dose restrictions in place at our hospital. Dose restrictions were fulfilled in treatment plans for evaluation, excluding those with a clinical target volume (CTV) of V100 {\%} and planning target volume (PTV) of D95 when the rectum was excluded. However, in treatment plans for evaluation, IMRT was shown to have a higher concordance rate with standard treatment plans than VMAT. Conclusion: If rectal gas is present during either IMRT or VMAT, a dose decrease will occur in relation to CTV and PTV, suggesting that a plan does not eliminate adverse effects on organs at risk.",
keywords = "Dose distribution, Gas, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Prostate cancer, Volumetric-modulated arc therapy",
author = "Motoharu Sasaki and Hitoshi Ikushima and Masahide Tominaga and Takeshi Kamomae and Taro Kishi and Masataka Oita and Masafumi Harada",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "723--733",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Radiology",
issn = "1867-1071",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT

AU - Sasaki, Motoharu

AU - Ikushima, Hitoshi

AU - Tominaga, Masahide

AU - Kamomae, Takeshi

AU - Kishi, Taro

AU - Oita, Masataka

AU - Harada, Masafumi

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Purpose: In this study, we compared the dose impact of the heterogeneity caused by rectal gas using two methods of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods: In addition to the structure set used for the standard treatment plan, we created a structure set for evaluation for each patient. These sets were transferred to the same isocenter as the respective treatment plans for IMRT and VMAT that were to become the standard. Values were then recalculated. Results: During the standard prostatic IMRT and VMAT treatment planning, all study participants met dose restrictions in place at our hospital. Dose restrictions were fulfilled in treatment plans for evaluation, excluding those with a clinical target volume (CTV) of V100 % and planning target volume (PTV) of D95 when the rectum was excluded. However, in treatment plans for evaluation, IMRT was shown to have a higher concordance rate with standard treatment plans than VMAT. Conclusion: If rectal gas is present during either IMRT or VMAT, a dose decrease will occur in relation to CTV and PTV, suggesting that a plan does not eliminate adverse effects on organs at risk.

AB - Purpose: In this study, we compared the dose impact of the heterogeneity caused by rectal gas using two methods of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and methods: In addition to the structure set used for the standard treatment plan, we created a structure set for evaluation for each patient. These sets were transferred to the same isocenter as the respective treatment plans for IMRT and VMAT that were to become the standard. Values were then recalculated. Results: During the standard prostatic IMRT and VMAT treatment planning, all study participants met dose restrictions in place at our hospital. Dose restrictions were fulfilled in treatment plans for evaluation, excluding those with a clinical target volume (CTV) of V100 % and planning target volume (PTV) of D95 when the rectum was excluded. However, in treatment plans for evaluation, IMRT was shown to have a higher concordance rate with standard treatment plans than VMAT. Conclusion: If rectal gas is present during either IMRT or VMAT, a dose decrease will occur in relation to CTV and PTV, suggesting that a plan does not eliminate adverse effects on organs at risk.

KW - Dose distribution

KW - Gas

KW - Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

KW - Prostate cancer

KW - Volumetric-modulated arc therapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953347847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953347847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7

DO - 10.1007/s11604-015-0481-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 26573828

AN - SCOPUS:84953347847

VL - 33

SP - 723

EP - 733

JO - Japanese Journal of Radiology

JF - Japanese Journal of Radiology

SN - 1867-1071

IS - 12

ER -