Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications

Tetsuro Mazaki, Yasuo Ito, Yoshihisa Sugimoto, Koichiro Koshimune, Masato Tanaka, Toshihumi Ozaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression is a fairly common problem in Japan. Because elderly Japanese population tend to have cervical spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of these patients. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of these patients. Methods: Twenty-five patients had been enrolled in this study. Patients who had paralysis of ASIA impairment scale (AIS) A, B or C were included. With each new patient, we alternated whether he/she received surgical treatment (group S) or conservative treatment (group C). Eleven patients were assigned to each group. We compared the two groups' courses of treatment and complications by evaluating their neurological symptoms using the AIS and ASIA motor score (MS) documenting them at the time of injury and 3 months later. Results: The majority of clinical paralysis was found at the C3/4 level for both the groups. According to complications, there were seven urinary tract infections and four pneumonias in group S and one urinary tract infection and three pneumonias in group C. Both groups had an average MS of 42 at the time of injury. Three months later, the average MSs were 59 points in group S and 65 points in group C. Conclusions: In the present study, we found no significant difference in paralysis improvement between surgical and conservative treatment, although we observed a higher frequency of complications with surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1401-1405
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Volume133
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Spinal Cord Injuries
Prospective Studies
Bone and Bones
Wounds and Injuries
Paralysis
Urinary Tract Infections
Pneumonia
Spinal Stenosis
Spinal Cord Compression
Spinal Canal
Cervical Cord
Laminoplasty
Japan
Therapeutics
Population

Keywords

  • Cervical spinal cord injury
  • Conservative treatment
  • Prospective study
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications. / Mazaki, Tetsuro; Ito, Yasuo; Sugimoto, Yoshihisa; Koshimune, Koichiro; Tanaka, Masato; Ozaki, Toshihumi.

In: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Vol. 133, No. 10, 2013, p. 1401-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07546fafea1a4be79752c7355c8d9027,
title = "Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications",
abstract = "Purpose: Cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression is a fairly common problem in Japan. Because elderly Japanese population tend to have cervical spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of these patients. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of these patients. Methods: Twenty-five patients had been enrolled in this study. Patients who had paralysis of ASIA impairment scale (AIS) A, B or C were included. With each new patient, we alternated whether he/she received surgical treatment (group S) or conservative treatment (group C). Eleven patients were assigned to each group. We compared the two groups' courses of treatment and complications by evaluating their neurological symptoms using the AIS and ASIA motor score (MS) documenting them at the time of injury and 3 months later. Results: The majority of clinical paralysis was found at the C3/4 level for both the groups. According to complications, there were seven urinary tract infections and four pneumonias in group S and one urinary tract infection and three pneumonias in group C. Both groups had an average MS of 42 at the time of injury. Three months later, the average MSs were 59 points in group S and 65 points in group C. Conclusions: In the present study, we found no significant difference in paralysis improvement between surgical and conservative treatment, although we observed a higher frequency of complications with surgery.",
keywords = "Cervical spinal cord injury, Conservative treatment, Prospective study, Surgery",
author = "Tetsuro Mazaki and Yasuo Ito and Yoshihisa Sugimoto and Koichiro Koshimune and Masato Tanaka and Toshihumi Ozaki",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s00402-013-1810-x",
language = "English",
volume = "133",
pages = "1401--1405",
journal = "Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie",
issn = "0003-9330",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does laminoplasty really improve neurological status in patients with cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury? A prospective study about neurological recovery and early complications

AU - Mazaki, Tetsuro

AU - Ito, Yasuo

AU - Sugimoto, Yoshihisa

AU - Koshimune, Koichiro

AU - Tanaka, Masato

AU - Ozaki, Toshihumi

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression is a fairly common problem in Japan. Because elderly Japanese population tend to have cervical spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of these patients. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of these patients. Methods: Twenty-five patients had been enrolled in this study. Patients who had paralysis of ASIA impairment scale (AIS) A, B or C were included. With each new patient, we alternated whether he/she received surgical treatment (group S) or conservative treatment (group C). Eleven patients were assigned to each group. We compared the two groups' courses of treatment and complications by evaluating their neurological symptoms using the AIS and ASIA motor score (MS) documenting them at the time of injury and 3 months later. Results: The majority of clinical paralysis was found at the C3/4 level for both the groups. According to complications, there were seven urinary tract infections and four pneumonias in group S and one urinary tract infection and three pneumonias in group C. Both groups had an average MS of 42 at the time of injury. Three months later, the average MSs were 59 points in group S and 65 points in group C. Conclusions: In the present study, we found no significant difference in paralysis improvement between surgical and conservative treatment, although we observed a higher frequency of complications with surgery.

AB - Purpose: Cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury in patients with spinal cord compression is a fairly common problem in Japan. Because elderly Japanese population tend to have cervical spinal canal stenosis. However, there has been no consensus in the treatment of these patients. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of these patients. Methods: Twenty-five patients had been enrolled in this study. Patients who had paralysis of ASIA impairment scale (AIS) A, B or C were included. With each new patient, we alternated whether he/she received surgical treatment (group S) or conservative treatment (group C). Eleven patients were assigned to each group. We compared the two groups' courses of treatment and complications by evaluating their neurological symptoms using the AIS and ASIA motor score (MS) documenting them at the time of injury and 3 months later. Results: The majority of clinical paralysis was found at the C3/4 level for both the groups. According to complications, there were seven urinary tract infections and four pneumonias in group S and one urinary tract infection and three pneumonias in group C. Both groups had an average MS of 42 at the time of injury. Three months later, the average MSs were 59 points in group S and 65 points in group C. Conclusions: In the present study, we found no significant difference in paralysis improvement between surgical and conservative treatment, although we observed a higher frequency of complications with surgery.

KW - Cervical spinal cord injury

KW - Conservative treatment

KW - Prospective study

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885294610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885294610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00402-013-1810-x

DO - 10.1007/s00402-013-1810-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23860672

AN - SCOPUS:84885294610

VL - 133

SP - 1401

EP - 1405

JO - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

JF - Archiv fur orthopadische und Unfall-Chirurgie

SN - 0003-9330

IS - 10

ER -