Difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing

Hironobu Yamada; Teruki Hasegawa; Yudai Ishihara; Toshihiko Kiwa; Keiji Tsukada

doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004

Difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing

Hironobu Yamada, Teruki Hasegawa, Yudai Ishihara, Toshihiko Kiwa, Keiji Tsukada

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined the difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing. The detection limits were measured by using a magneto-resistive sensor. Comparing the frequency of an applied magnetic field, the detection limit at 50 Hz is deeper than that at 1 kHz. Comparing the sample structure, the detection limit in the multi-layered samples is deeper than that in the continuous samples. These results are likely due to the differences in the skin depth and conductivity of the sample.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	108-111
Number of pages	4
Journal	NDT and E International
Volume	41
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004
Publication status	Published - Mar 2008

Keywords

Eddy current testing
Low-frequency magnetic field
Magneto-resistive sensor
Non-destructive testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Materials Science(all)
Condensed Matter Physics
Mechanical Engineering

Access to Document

10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004

Cite this

@article{fc6ea1eb7ab94c0292db0dbb345f4559,

title = "Difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing",

abstract = "We examined the difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing. The detection limits were measured by using a magneto-resistive sensor. Comparing the frequency of an applied magnetic field, the detection limit at 50 Hz is deeper than that at 1 kHz. Comparing the sample structure, the detection limit in the multi-layered samples is deeper than that in the continuous samples. These results are likely due to the differences in the skin depth and conductivity of the sample.",

keywords = "Eddy current testing, Low-frequency magnetic field, Magneto-resistive sensor, Non-destructive testing",

author = "Hironobu Yamada and Teruki Hasegawa and Yudai Ishihara and Toshihiko Kiwa and Keiji Tsukada",

year = "2008",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "108--111",

journal = "NDT International",

issn = "0963-8695",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing

AU - Yamada, Hironobu

AU - Hasegawa, Teruki

AU - Ishihara, Yudai

AU - Kiwa, Toshihiko

AU - Tsukada, Keiji

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - We examined the difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing. The detection limits were measured by using a magneto-resistive sensor. Comparing the frequency of an applied magnetic field, the detection limit at 50 Hz is deeper than that at 1 kHz. Comparing the sample structure, the detection limit in the multi-layered samples is deeper than that in the continuous samples. These results are likely due to the differences in the skin depth and conductivity of the sample.

AB - We examined the difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing. The detection limits were measured by using a magneto-resistive sensor. Comparing the frequency of an applied magnetic field, the detection limit at 50 Hz is deeper than that at 1 kHz. Comparing the sample structure, the detection limit in the multi-layered samples is deeper than that in the continuous samples. These results are likely due to the differences in the skin depth and conductivity of the sample.

KW - Eddy current testing

KW - Low-frequency magnetic field

KW - Magneto-resistive sensor

KW - Non-destructive testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36649002848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36649002848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.08.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36649002848

VL - 41

SP - 108

EP - 111

JO - NDT International

JF - NDT International

SN - 0963-8695

IS - 2

ER -

Difference in the detection limits of flaws in the depths of multi-layered and continuous aluminum plates using low-frequency eddy current testing

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this