Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance images

M. Gabriela Orsini, Takuo Kuboki, Shohei Terada, Yoshizo Matsuka, Atsushi Yamashita, Glenn T. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study was undertaken to evaluate different criteria to establish normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. Study design. Magnetic resonance image findings of 137 consecutive patients with temporomandibular disorders and 23 asymptomatic volunteers were used in this study. Three calibrated observers interpreted the images individually. Four closed-mouth and 1 open-mouth criteria were tested for their ability to define normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disk positions on magnetic resonance images. Results. For the 46 joints in the asymptomatic volunteers, the criterion that yielded the highest percentage of normal disk position diagnoses was the disk's intermediate zone (93.5%). Clock face criteria produced the following declining percentages of normal disk position diagnoses: 10 o'clock, 82.6%; 11 o'clock, 63.0%; and 12 o'clock, 39.1%. Similar results were obtained for the patients with temporomandibular disorders. In both groups, as the number of normal disk position diagnoses declined, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement with reduction increased. Conversely, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement without reduction (in the group of patients with temporomandibular disorders) did not appear to be substantially affected by the 4 closed-mouth disk position criteria. Conclusions. These results suggest that the intermediate zone criterion for disk displacement is the more stringent criterion and the one that would yield the lowest number of false positives when the disk position is being judged in the closed-mouth sagittal view.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-497
Number of pages9
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume86
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Temporomandibular Joint Disc
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Mouth
Joints
Volunteers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. / Orsini, M. Gabriela; Kuboki, Takuo; Terada, Shohei; Matsuka, Yoshizo; Yamashita, Atsushi; Clark, Glenn T.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1998, p. 489-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Orsini, M. Gabriela ; Kuboki, Takuo ; Terada, Shohei ; Matsuka, Yoshizo ; Yamashita, Atsushi ; Clark, Glenn T. / Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics. 1998 ; Vol. 86, No. 4. pp. 489-497.
@article{e3c1576a41de431fbdf3e342745c3741,
title = "Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance images",
abstract = "Objective. This study was undertaken to evaluate different criteria to establish normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. Study design. Magnetic resonance image findings of 137 consecutive patients with temporomandibular disorders and 23 asymptomatic volunteers were used in this study. Three calibrated observers interpreted the images individually. Four closed-mouth and 1 open-mouth criteria were tested for their ability to define normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disk positions on magnetic resonance images. Results. For the 46 joints in the asymptomatic volunteers, the criterion that yielded the highest percentage of normal disk position diagnoses was the disk's intermediate zone (93.5{\%}). Clock face criteria produced the following declining percentages of normal disk position diagnoses: 10 o'clock, 82.6{\%}; 11 o'clock, 63.0{\%}; and 12 o'clock, 39.1{\%}. Similar results were obtained for the patients with temporomandibular disorders. In both groups, as the number of normal disk position diagnoses declined, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement with reduction increased. Conversely, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement without reduction (in the group of patients with temporomandibular disorders) did not appear to be substantially affected by the 4 closed-mouth disk position criteria. Conclusions. These results suggest that the intermediate zone criterion for disk displacement is the more stringent criterion and the one that would yield the lowest number of false positives when the disk position is being judged in the closed-mouth sagittal view.",
author = "Orsini, {M. Gabriela} and Takuo Kuboki and Shohei Terada and Yoshizo Matsuka and Atsushi Yamashita and Clark, {Glenn T.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "489--497",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic value of 4 criteria to interpret temporomandibular joint normal disk position on magnetic resonance images

AU - Orsini, M. Gabriela

AU - Kuboki, Takuo

AU - Terada, Shohei

AU - Matsuka, Yoshizo

AU - Yamashita, Atsushi

AU - Clark, Glenn T.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Objective. This study was undertaken to evaluate different criteria to establish normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. Study design. Magnetic resonance image findings of 137 consecutive patients with temporomandibular disorders and 23 asymptomatic volunteers were used in this study. Three calibrated observers interpreted the images individually. Four closed-mouth and 1 open-mouth criteria were tested for their ability to define normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disk positions on magnetic resonance images. Results. For the 46 joints in the asymptomatic volunteers, the criterion that yielded the highest percentage of normal disk position diagnoses was the disk's intermediate zone (93.5%). Clock face criteria produced the following declining percentages of normal disk position diagnoses: 10 o'clock, 82.6%; 11 o'clock, 63.0%; and 12 o'clock, 39.1%. Similar results were obtained for the patients with temporomandibular disorders. In both groups, as the number of normal disk position diagnoses declined, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement with reduction increased. Conversely, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement without reduction (in the group of patients with temporomandibular disorders) did not appear to be substantially affected by the 4 closed-mouth disk position criteria. Conclusions. These results suggest that the intermediate zone criterion for disk displacement is the more stringent criterion and the one that would yield the lowest number of false positives when the disk position is being judged in the closed-mouth sagittal view.

AB - Objective. This study was undertaken to evaluate different criteria to establish normal disk position on magnetic resonance images. Study design. Magnetic resonance image findings of 137 consecutive patients with temporomandibular disorders and 23 asymptomatic volunteers were used in this study. Three calibrated observers interpreted the images individually. Four closed-mouth and 1 open-mouth criteria were tested for their ability to define normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disk positions on magnetic resonance images. Results. For the 46 joints in the asymptomatic volunteers, the criterion that yielded the highest percentage of normal disk position diagnoses was the disk's intermediate zone (93.5%). Clock face criteria produced the following declining percentages of normal disk position diagnoses: 10 o'clock, 82.6%; 11 o'clock, 63.0%; and 12 o'clock, 39.1%. Similar results were obtained for the patients with temporomandibular disorders. In both groups, as the number of normal disk position diagnoses declined, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement with reduction increased. Conversely, the percentage of joints with a diagnosis of disk displacement without reduction (in the group of patients with temporomandibular disorders) did not appear to be substantially affected by the 4 closed-mouth disk position criteria. Conclusions. These results suggest that the intermediate zone criterion for disk displacement is the more stringent criterion and the one that would yield the lowest number of false positives when the disk position is being judged in the closed-mouth sagittal view.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032185471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032185471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 489

EP - 497

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 4

ER -