Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses: Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year

M. J. Park, Joseph Green, Hirono Ishikawa, Yoshihiko Yamazaki, Akira Kitagawa, Miho Ono, Fumiko Yasukata, Takahiro Kiuchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:In people with chronic illnesses, self-management education can reduce anxiety and depression. Those benefits, however, decay over time. Efforts have been made to prevent or minimize that "decay of impact", but they have not been based on information about the decay's characteristics, and they have failed. Here we show how the decay's basic characteristics (prevalence, timing, and magnitude) can be quantified. Regarding anxiety and depression, we also report the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of the decay.Methods:Adults with various chronic conditions participated in a self-management educational program (n = 369). Data were collected with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale four times over one year. Using within-person effect sizes, we defined decay of impact as a decline of ≥0.5 standard deviations after improvement by at least the same amount. We also interpret the results using previously-set criteria for non-cases, possible cases, and probable cases.Results:Prevalence: On anxiety, decay occurred in 19% of the participants (70/369), and on depression it occurred in 24% (90/369). Timing: In about one third of those with decay, it began 3 months after the baseline measurement (6 weeks after the educational program ended). Magnitude: The median magnitudes of decay on anxiety and on depression were both 4 points, which was about 1 standard deviation. Early in the follow-up year, many participants with decay moved into less severe clinical categories (e.g., becoming non-cases). Later, many of them moved into more severe categories (e.g., becoming probable cases).Conclusions:Decay of impact can be identified and quantified from within-person effect sizes. This decay occurs in about one fifth or more of this program's participants. It can start soon after the program ends, and it is large enough to be clinically important. These findings can be used to plan interventions aimed at preventing or minimizing the decay of impact.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere65316
JournalPLoS One
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 13 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

anxiety
Self Care
chronic diseases
education
Chronic Disease
Anxiety
Education
deterioration
Depression
education programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses : Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year. / Park, M. J.; Green, Joseph; Ishikawa, Hirono; Yamazaki, Yoshihiko; Kitagawa, Akira; Ono, Miho; Yasukata, Fumiko; Kiuchi, Takahiro.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 6, e65316, 13.06.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, M. J. ; Green, Joseph ; Ishikawa, Hirono ; Yamazaki, Yoshihiko ; Kitagawa, Akira ; Ono, Miho ; Yasukata, Fumiko ; Kiuchi, Takahiro. / Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses : Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year. In: PLoS One. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 6.
@article{6dcfc35158a047be9c8883eaf53e3e2d,
title = "Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses: Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year",
abstract = "Background:In people with chronic illnesses, self-management education can reduce anxiety and depression. Those benefits, however, decay over time. Efforts have been made to prevent or minimize that {"}decay of impact{"}, but they have not been based on information about the decay's characteristics, and they have failed. Here we show how the decay's basic characteristics (prevalence, timing, and magnitude) can be quantified. Regarding anxiety and depression, we also report the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of the decay.Methods:Adults with various chronic conditions participated in a self-management educational program (n = 369). Data were collected with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale four times over one year. Using within-person effect sizes, we defined decay of impact as a decline of ≥0.5 standard deviations after improvement by at least the same amount. We also interpret the results using previously-set criteria for non-cases, possible cases, and probable cases.Results:Prevalence: On anxiety, decay occurred in 19{\%} of the participants (70/369), and on depression it occurred in 24{\%} (90/369). Timing: In about one third of those with decay, it began 3 months after the baseline measurement (6 weeks after the educational program ended). Magnitude: The median magnitudes of decay on anxiety and on depression were both 4 points, which was about 1 standard deviation. Early in the follow-up year, many participants with decay moved into less severe clinical categories (e.g., becoming non-cases). Later, many of them moved into more severe categories (e.g., becoming probable cases).Conclusions:Decay of impact can be identified and quantified from within-person effect sizes. This decay occurs in about one fifth or more of this program's participants. It can start soon after the program ends, and it is large enough to be clinically important. These findings can be used to plan interventions aimed at preventing or minimizing the decay of impact.",
author = "Park, {M. J.} and Joseph Green and Hirono Ishikawa and Yoshihiko Yamazaki and Akira Kitagawa and Miho Ono and Fumiko Yasukata and Takahiro Kiuchi",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0065316",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decay of Impact after Self-Management Education for People with Chronic Illnesses

T2 - Changes in Anxiety and Depression over One Year

AU - Park, M. J.

AU - Green, Joseph

AU - Ishikawa, Hirono

AU - Yamazaki, Yoshihiko

AU - Kitagawa, Akira

AU - Ono, Miho

AU - Yasukata, Fumiko

AU - Kiuchi, Takahiro

PY - 2013/6/13

Y1 - 2013/6/13

N2 - Background:In people with chronic illnesses, self-management education can reduce anxiety and depression. Those benefits, however, decay over time. Efforts have been made to prevent or minimize that "decay of impact", but they have not been based on information about the decay's characteristics, and they have failed. Here we show how the decay's basic characteristics (prevalence, timing, and magnitude) can be quantified. Regarding anxiety and depression, we also report the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of the decay.Methods:Adults with various chronic conditions participated in a self-management educational program (n = 369). Data were collected with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale four times over one year. Using within-person effect sizes, we defined decay of impact as a decline of ≥0.5 standard deviations after improvement by at least the same amount. We also interpret the results using previously-set criteria for non-cases, possible cases, and probable cases.Results:Prevalence: On anxiety, decay occurred in 19% of the participants (70/369), and on depression it occurred in 24% (90/369). Timing: In about one third of those with decay, it began 3 months after the baseline measurement (6 weeks after the educational program ended). Magnitude: The median magnitudes of decay on anxiety and on depression were both 4 points, which was about 1 standard deviation. Early in the follow-up year, many participants with decay moved into less severe clinical categories (e.g., becoming non-cases). Later, many of them moved into more severe categories (e.g., becoming probable cases).Conclusions:Decay of impact can be identified and quantified from within-person effect sizes. This decay occurs in about one fifth or more of this program's participants. It can start soon after the program ends, and it is large enough to be clinically important. These findings can be used to plan interventions aimed at preventing or minimizing the decay of impact.

AB - Background:In people with chronic illnesses, self-management education can reduce anxiety and depression. Those benefits, however, decay over time. Efforts have been made to prevent or minimize that "decay of impact", but they have not been based on information about the decay's characteristics, and they have failed. Here we show how the decay's basic characteristics (prevalence, timing, and magnitude) can be quantified. Regarding anxiety and depression, we also report the prevalence, timing, and magnitude of the decay.Methods:Adults with various chronic conditions participated in a self-management educational program (n = 369). Data were collected with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale four times over one year. Using within-person effect sizes, we defined decay of impact as a decline of ≥0.5 standard deviations after improvement by at least the same amount. We also interpret the results using previously-set criteria for non-cases, possible cases, and probable cases.Results:Prevalence: On anxiety, decay occurred in 19% of the participants (70/369), and on depression it occurred in 24% (90/369). Timing: In about one third of those with decay, it began 3 months after the baseline measurement (6 weeks after the educational program ended). Magnitude: The median magnitudes of decay on anxiety and on depression were both 4 points, which was about 1 standard deviation. Early in the follow-up year, many participants with decay moved into less severe clinical categories (e.g., becoming non-cases). Later, many of them moved into more severe categories (e.g., becoming probable cases).Conclusions:Decay of impact can be identified and quantified from within-person effect sizes. This decay occurs in about one fifth or more of this program's participants. It can start soon after the program ends, and it is large enough to be clinically important. These findings can be used to plan interventions aimed at preventing or minimizing the decay of impact.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878968711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878968711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0065316

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0065316

M3 - Article

C2 - 23785418

AN - SCOPUS:84878968711

VL - 8

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 6

M1 - e65316

ER -