Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists

Tatsuro Furui, Yasushi Takai, Fuminori Kimura, Michio Kitajima, Mikiya Nakatsuka, Ken Ichiro Morishige, Kazuhito Yamamoto, Hiroya Hashimoto, Kimikazu Matsumoto, Seiichiro Ozono, Keizo Horibe, Nao Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A national survey conducted in 2016 aimed to evaluate the current status and needs of the field of oncofertility and to consider optimized medical delivery systems. A total of 739 oncologists, excluding gynecological and urological specialists, were surveyed. Of these, 99.2% thought that providing information on fertility preservation was important. Of the surveyed oncologists, 48% were affiliated with facilities providing assisted reproductive technology, and 79.3% practiced in university hospitals. Of 238 (32.2%) specialists who provided information on the risk of reproductive damage resulting from treatment in their facility, 163 (44.9%) and 75 (19.9%) practiced in university hospitals (n=363) and non-university hospitals (n= 376), respectively. In contrast, 14.3% and 32.7% of oncologists who practiced in university hospitals and non-university hospitals, respectively, collaborated with local obstetricians and gynecologists. Among oncologists who use a gradually expanding regional oncofertility network, 0.6% practice in university hospitals and 2.7% practice in non-university hospitals. Patients were advised that the risk of infertility was 92.3% and the likelihood of fertility preservation was 66.9%. Furthermore, as an ideal way of providing information on preservation of fertility, 22.9% of oncologists collaborate with local gynecologists, and 26.3% do so at a public cancer and reproductive medical counseling center. In addition, 34.7% and 55.1% of oncologists at university and non-university hospitals, respectively, thought that implementation of a fertility preservation program at a public facility would be desirable. Although most oncologists recognize the importance of providing information on reproductive medicine, the support system for reproductive function and fertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients is limited because of the lack of agreement on patient referral. The limited number of referrals in turn limits data collection in the field of oncofertility. Grant: A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant: H27-Cancer Control-lppan,.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-846
Number of pages6
JournalJapanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy
Volume45
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Young Adult
Japan
Fertility Preservation
Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation
Public Facilities
Reproductive Medicine
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Surveys and Questionnaires
Oncologists
Infertility
Fertility
Counseling
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Information provision
  • National survey
  • Oncofertility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists. / Furui, Tatsuro; Takai, Yasushi; Kimura, Fuminori; Kitajima, Michio; Nakatsuka, Mikiya; Morishige, Ken Ichiro; Yamamoto, Kazuhito; Hashimoto, Hiroya; Matsumoto, Kimikazu; Ozono, Seiichiro; Horibe, Keizo; Suzuki, Nao.

In: Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy, Vol. 45, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 841-846.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Furui, T, Takai, Y, Kimura, F, Kitajima, M, Nakatsuka, M, Morishige, KI, Yamamoto, K, Hashimoto, H, Matsumoto, K, Ozono, S, Horibe, K & Suzuki, N 2018, 'Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists', Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 841-846.
Furui, Tatsuro ; Takai, Yasushi ; Kimura, Fuminori ; Kitajima, Michio ; Nakatsuka, Mikiya ; Morishige, Ken Ichiro ; Yamamoto, Kazuhito ; Hashimoto, Hiroya ; Matsumoto, Kimikazu ; Ozono, Seiichiro ; Horibe, Keizo ; Suzuki, Nao. / Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists. In: Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy. 2018 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 841-846.
@article{4b267fc3eb41407993e9b5a9422d603c,
title = "Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists",
abstract = "A national survey conducted in 2016 aimed to evaluate the current status and needs of the field of oncofertility and to consider optimized medical delivery systems. A total of 739 oncologists, excluding gynecological and urological specialists, were surveyed. Of these, 99.2{\%} thought that providing information on fertility preservation was important. Of the surveyed oncologists, 48{\%} were affiliated with facilities providing assisted reproductive technology, and 79.3{\%} practiced in university hospitals. Of 238 (32.2{\%}) specialists who provided information on the risk of reproductive damage resulting from treatment in their facility, 163 (44.9{\%}) and 75 (19.9{\%}) practiced in university hospitals (n=363) and non-university hospitals (n= 376), respectively. In contrast, 14.3{\%} and 32.7{\%} of oncologists who practiced in university hospitals and non-university hospitals, respectively, collaborated with local obstetricians and gynecologists. Among oncologists who use a gradually expanding regional oncofertility network, 0.6{\%} practice in university hospitals and 2.7{\%} practice in non-university hospitals. Patients were advised that the risk of infertility was 92.3{\%} and the likelihood of fertility preservation was 66.9{\%}. Furthermore, as an ideal way of providing information on preservation of fertility, 22.9{\%} of oncologists collaborate with local gynecologists, and 26.3{\%} do so at a public cancer and reproductive medical counseling center. In addition, 34.7{\%} and 55.1{\%} of oncologists at university and non-university hospitals, respectively, thought that implementation of a fertility preservation program at a public facility would be desirable. Although most oncologists recognize the importance of providing information on reproductive medicine, the support system for reproductive function and fertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients is limited because of the lack of agreement on patient referral. The limited number of referrals in turn limits data collection in the field of oncofertility. Grant: A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant: H27-Cancer Control-lppan,.",
keywords = "Information provision, National survey, Oncofertility",
author = "Tatsuro Furui and Yasushi Takai and Fuminori Kimura and Michio Kitajima and Mikiya Nakatsuka and Morishige, {Ken Ichiro} and Kazuhito Yamamoto and Hiroya Hashimoto and Kimikazu Matsumoto and Seiichiro Ozono and Keizo Horibe and Nao Suzuki",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "841--846",
journal = "Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy",
issn = "0385-0684",
publisher = "Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy Publishers Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status of oncofertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients in Japan-National survey of oncologists

AU - Furui, Tatsuro

AU - Takai, Yasushi

AU - Kimura, Fuminori

AU - Kitajima, Michio

AU - Nakatsuka, Mikiya

AU - Morishige, Ken Ichiro

AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhito

AU - Hashimoto, Hiroya

AU - Matsumoto, Kimikazu

AU - Ozono, Seiichiro

AU - Horibe, Keizo

AU - Suzuki, Nao

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - A national survey conducted in 2016 aimed to evaluate the current status and needs of the field of oncofertility and to consider optimized medical delivery systems. A total of 739 oncologists, excluding gynecological and urological specialists, were surveyed. Of these, 99.2% thought that providing information on fertility preservation was important. Of the surveyed oncologists, 48% were affiliated with facilities providing assisted reproductive technology, and 79.3% practiced in university hospitals. Of 238 (32.2%) specialists who provided information on the risk of reproductive damage resulting from treatment in their facility, 163 (44.9%) and 75 (19.9%) practiced in university hospitals (n=363) and non-university hospitals (n= 376), respectively. In contrast, 14.3% and 32.7% of oncologists who practiced in university hospitals and non-university hospitals, respectively, collaborated with local obstetricians and gynecologists. Among oncologists who use a gradually expanding regional oncofertility network, 0.6% practice in university hospitals and 2.7% practice in non-university hospitals. Patients were advised that the risk of infertility was 92.3% and the likelihood of fertility preservation was 66.9%. Furthermore, as an ideal way of providing information on preservation of fertility, 22.9% of oncologists collaborate with local gynecologists, and 26.3% do so at a public cancer and reproductive medical counseling center. In addition, 34.7% and 55.1% of oncologists at university and non-university hospitals, respectively, thought that implementation of a fertility preservation program at a public facility would be desirable. Although most oncologists recognize the importance of providing information on reproductive medicine, the support system for reproductive function and fertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients is limited because of the lack of agreement on patient referral. The limited number of referrals in turn limits data collection in the field of oncofertility. Grant: A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant: H27-Cancer Control-lppan,.

AB - A national survey conducted in 2016 aimed to evaluate the current status and needs of the field of oncofertility and to consider optimized medical delivery systems. A total of 739 oncologists, excluding gynecological and urological specialists, were surveyed. Of these, 99.2% thought that providing information on fertility preservation was important. Of the surveyed oncologists, 48% were affiliated with facilities providing assisted reproductive technology, and 79.3% practiced in university hospitals. Of 238 (32.2%) specialists who provided information on the risk of reproductive damage resulting from treatment in their facility, 163 (44.9%) and 75 (19.9%) practiced in university hospitals (n=363) and non-university hospitals (n= 376), respectively. In contrast, 14.3% and 32.7% of oncologists who practiced in university hospitals and non-university hospitals, respectively, collaborated with local obstetricians and gynecologists. Among oncologists who use a gradually expanding regional oncofertility network, 0.6% practice in university hospitals and 2.7% practice in non-university hospitals. Patients were advised that the risk of infertility was 92.3% and the likelihood of fertility preservation was 66.9%. Furthermore, as an ideal way of providing information on preservation of fertility, 22.9% of oncologists collaborate with local gynecologists, and 26.3% do so at a public cancer and reproductive medical counseling center. In addition, 34.7% and 55.1% of oncologists at university and non-university hospitals, respectively, thought that implementation of a fertility preservation program at a public facility would be desirable. Although most oncologists recognize the importance of providing information on reproductive medicine, the support system for reproductive function and fertility in adolescent and young adult (AYA) generation cancer patients is limited because of the lack of agreement on patient referral. The limited number of referrals in turn limits data collection in the field of oncofertility. Grant: A Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant: H27-Cancer Control-lppan,.

KW - Information provision

KW - National survey

KW - Oncofertility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051192917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051192917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 841

EP - 846

JO - Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy

JF - Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy

SN - 0385-0684

IS - 5

ER -