Cross-national comparison of medical costs shared by payers and patients

A study of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer based on assumption case scenarios and reimbursement fees

Shota Hamada, Shiro Hinotsu, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Masakazu Toi, Koji Kawakami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. Material and Methods: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. Results: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (∼25,000 vs. 8,627). Conclusion: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-288
Number of pages7
JournalBreast Care
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fees and Charges
Breast Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Japan
Germany
Cost Sharing
Administrative Personnel
Radiotherapy

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Cost-sharing
  • Health care system
  • Reimbursement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Cross-national comparison of medical costs shared by payers and patients : A study of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer based on assumption case scenarios and reimbursement fees. / Hamada, Shota; Hinotsu, Shiro; Ishiguro, Hiroshi; Toi, Masakazu; Kawakami, Koji.

In: Breast Care, Vol. 8, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 282-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{923b5de5a2a14817a0aba82917b17ab3,
title = "Cross-national comparison of medical costs shared by payers and patients: A study of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer based on assumption case scenarios and reimbursement fees",
abstract = "Background: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. Material and Methods: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. Results: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (∼25,000 vs. 8,627). Conclusion: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Cost-sharing, Health care system, Reimbursement",
author = "Shota Hamada and Shiro Hinotsu and Hiroshi Ishiguro and Masakazu Toi and Koji Kawakami",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1159/000354249",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "282--288",
journal = "Breast Care",
issn = "1661-3791",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cross-national comparison of medical costs shared by payers and patients

T2 - A study of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer based on assumption case scenarios and reimbursement fees

AU - Hamada, Shota

AU - Hinotsu, Shiro

AU - Ishiguro, Hiroshi

AU - Toi, Masakazu

AU - Kawakami, Koji

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Background: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. Material and Methods: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. Results: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (∼25,000 vs. 8,627). Conclusion: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.

AB - Background: The objectives of this study were to estimate and cross-nationally compare the medical costs shared by payers and patients and the distributions of medical costs by cost category. Material and Methods: We estimated the medical costs covered from definitive diagnosis to completion of treatments of early-stage breast cancer and follow-up, assuming almost identical medical care provided in Japan, the UK, and Germany. The analysis was performed from the payer's perspective. Medical costs were calculated by multiplying the unit costs by the number of units consumed, based on assumption case scenarios. The medical costs incurred by payers or patients were estimated according to the cost-sharing and the cost-bearing systems in each country. Results: The total medical costs in Japan were much lower than those in the UK and Germany, and these differences were mainly caused by the low costs of surgery and radiotherapy in Japan. For the base-case scenario, the co-payment in Japan (3,486) was found to be 6.4-fold higher than that in Germany (548). The payers in the European countries paid 2.9-fold more than those in Japan (∼25,000 vs. 8,627). Conclusion: Our results will be useful for policy makers in considering how to share medical costs and how to allocate limited resources.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Cost-sharing

KW - Health care system

KW - Reimbursement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885167430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885167430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000354249

DO - 10.1159/000354249

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 282

EP - 288

JO - Breast Care

JF - Breast Care

SN - 1661-3791

IS - 4

ER -