Correction to: Outcomes of endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy: analysis of risk factors for clinical failure (Surgical Endoscopy, (2020), 10.1007/s00464-020-07385-y)

Takeshi Tomoda, Hironari Kato, Kazuya Miyamoto, Akihiro Matsumi, Eijiro Ueta, Yuuki Fujii, Yousuke Saragai, Tatsuhiro Yamazaki, Daisuke Uchida, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Hiroyuki Okada

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

There are several places where the P-value and Odds ratio in Table 3 are incorrect: these are shown in the corrected Table 3. The following two sentences related to Table 3 should be corrected: 1. In the Results section of the Abstract, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5, p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8, p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” 2. In the last line of Clinical outcome section, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5) (p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8) (p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” The authors regret these errors. (Table presented.).

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Outcomes of endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy: analysis of risk factors for clinical failure (Surgical Endoscopy, (2020), 10.1007/s00464-020-07385-y)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this