Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy

N. Seki, J. Kodama, T. Kusumoto, Keiichiro Nakamura, A. Hongo, Y. Hiramatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laser conization and the obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing diagnostic laser conization during pregnancy. Study Design: The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 47 patients who presented with histologically proven carcinoma in situ microinvasive carcinoma and were treated with laser conization during pregnancy. Results: Diagnostic laser conization was performed at 3-28 weeks (median, 13 weeks) of gestation. Intraoperative blood loss of > 500 ml was observed in two cases (4.3%); however, hemotransfusion was not required in either case. In the early postoperative period, two miscarriages due to preterm premature rupture of the membrane were observed. In the late postoperative period, one spontaneous abortion, three preterm deliveries, and one neonatal death were observed. All the poor obstetric outcomes were observed in the case of patients who underwent conization in the first trimester. The pathology report for the laser conization revealed that two patients (4.3%) had invasive carcinoma. Of the 47 patients, 29 (61.7%) had positive cervical margin, and 13 required postpartum surgical intervention. All patients treated were disease-free at the time of the subsequent follow-up. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that laser conization in pregnant patients is feasible and is comparable to cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedures with regard to the rates of complication and obstetric outcomes. Furthermore, they indicate that the optimal time for conization is probably the second trimester.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-401
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Journal of Gynaecological Oncology
Volume31
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Conization
Obstetrics
Lasers
Pregnancy
Spontaneous Abortion
Postoperative Period
Carcinoma
Carcinoma in Situ
Second Pregnancy Trimester
First Pregnancy Trimester
Postpartum Period
Pathology

Keywords

  • Complication
  • Laser conization
  • Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Oncology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Seki, N., Kodama, J., Kusumoto, T., Nakamura, K., Hongo, A., & Hiramatsu, Y. (2010). Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 31(4), 399-401.

Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy. / Seki, N.; Kodama, J.; Kusumoto, T.; Nakamura, Keiichiro; Hongo, A.; Hiramatsu, Y.

In: European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2010, p. 399-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seki, N, Kodama, J, Kusumoto, T, Nakamura, K, Hongo, A & Hiramatsu, Y 2010, 'Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy', European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 399-401.
Seki, N. ; Kodama, J. ; Kusumoto, T. ; Nakamura, Keiichiro ; Hongo, A. ; Hiramatsu, Y. / Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy. In: European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2010 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 399-401.
@article{efeffa42cf624ce19c81d077d1179432,
title = "Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laser conization and the obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing diagnostic laser conization during pregnancy. Study Design: The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 47 patients who presented with histologically proven carcinoma in situ microinvasive carcinoma and were treated with laser conization during pregnancy. Results: Diagnostic laser conization was performed at 3-28 weeks (median, 13 weeks) of gestation. Intraoperative blood loss of > 500 ml was observed in two cases (4.3{\%}); however, hemotransfusion was not required in either case. In the early postoperative period, two miscarriages due to preterm premature rupture of the membrane were observed. In the late postoperative period, one spontaneous abortion, three preterm deliveries, and one neonatal death were observed. All the poor obstetric outcomes were observed in the case of patients who underwent conization in the first trimester. The pathology report for the laser conization revealed that two patients (4.3{\%}) had invasive carcinoma. Of the 47 patients, 29 (61.7{\%}) had positive cervical margin, and 13 required postpartum surgical intervention. All patients treated were disease-free at the time of the subsequent follow-up. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that laser conization in pregnant patients is feasible and is comparable to cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedures with regard to the rates of complication and obstetric outcomes. Furthermore, they indicate that the optimal time for conization is probably the second trimester.",
keywords = "Complication, Laser conization, Pregnancy",
author = "N. Seki and J. Kodama and T. Kusumoto and Keiichiro Nakamura and A. Hongo and Y. Hiramatsu",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "399--401",
journal = "European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology",
issn = "0392-2936",
publisher = "S.O.G. CANADA Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications and obstetric outcomes after laser conization during pregnancy

AU - Seki, N.

AU - Kodama, J.

AU - Kusumoto, T.

AU - Nakamura, Keiichiro

AU - Hongo, A.

AU - Hiramatsu, Y.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laser conization and the obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing diagnostic laser conization during pregnancy. Study Design: The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 47 patients who presented with histologically proven carcinoma in situ microinvasive carcinoma and were treated with laser conization during pregnancy. Results: Diagnostic laser conization was performed at 3-28 weeks (median, 13 weeks) of gestation. Intraoperative blood loss of > 500 ml was observed in two cases (4.3%); however, hemotransfusion was not required in either case. In the early postoperative period, two miscarriages due to preterm premature rupture of the membrane were observed. In the late postoperative period, one spontaneous abortion, three preterm deliveries, and one neonatal death were observed. All the poor obstetric outcomes were observed in the case of patients who underwent conization in the first trimester. The pathology report for the laser conization revealed that two patients (4.3%) had invasive carcinoma. Of the 47 patients, 29 (61.7%) had positive cervical margin, and 13 required postpartum surgical intervention. All patients treated were disease-free at the time of the subsequent follow-up. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that laser conization in pregnant patients is feasible and is comparable to cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedures with regard to the rates of complication and obstetric outcomes. Furthermore, they indicate that the optimal time for conization is probably the second trimester.

AB - Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic laser conization and the obstetric outcomes of patients undergoing diagnostic laser conization during pregnancy. Study Design: The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 47 patients who presented with histologically proven carcinoma in situ microinvasive carcinoma and were treated with laser conization during pregnancy. Results: Diagnostic laser conization was performed at 3-28 weeks (median, 13 weeks) of gestation. Intraoperative blood loss of > 500 ml was observed in two cases (4.3%); however, hemotransfusion was not required in either case. In the early postoperative period, two miscarriages due to preterm premature rupture of the membrane were observed. In the late postoperative period, one spontaneous abortion, three preterm deliveries, and one neonatal death were observed. All the poor obstetric outcomes were observed in the case of patients who underwent conization in the first trimester. The pathology report for the laser conization revealed that two patients (4.3%) had invasive carcinoma. Of the 47 patients, 29 (61.7%) had positive cervical margin, and 13 required postpartum surgical intervention. All patients treated were disease-free at the time of the subsequent follow-up. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that laser conization in pregnant patients is feasible and is comparable to cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedures with regard to the rates of complication and obstetric outcomes. Furthermore, they indicate that the optimal time for conization is probably the second trimester.

KW - Complication

KW - Laser conization

KW - Pregnancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956106404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956106404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 399

EP - 401

JO - European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology

JF - European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology

SN - 0392-2936

IS - 4

ER -