Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment

Etsuko Oshima, Shintaro Takenoshita, Risa Iwai, Mayumi Yabe, Nao Imai, Makiko Horiuchi, Naoya Takeda, Yosuke Uchitomi, Norihito Yamada, Seishi Terada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background:In medical practice, a patient's loss of competency is a major obstacle when choosing a treatment and a starting treatment program smoothly. A large number of studies have revealed the lack of medical competency in patients with dementia. However, there have been only a few reports focusing on the capacity of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to make a medical choice.Methods:In this study, we evaluated the competency of 40 patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and 33 normal subjects to make a medical choice using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T). We compared the judgement of a team conference using the recorded semi-structured interview with the clinical judgement of a chief clinician.Results:A team conference concluded that 12 aMCI patients had no competency, and the clinical judgement, without any special interview, judged that five aMCI patients had no competency. All subjects in the control groups were judged to be competent to consent to treatment by both clinicians and the team conference.Conclusions:Without supplementary tools such as explanatory documents, not a few patients with aMCI were judged by a team conference to have no competency to consent to therapy even in a relatively simple and easy case. In contrast, clinical physicians tended to evaluate the competency of aMCI patients in a generous manner.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Cholinesterases
Therapeutics
Interviews
Clinical Competence
Mental Competency
Dementia
Physicians
Control Groups

Keywords

  • consent
  • decision
  • dementia
  • MacCAT-T
  • mild cognitive impairment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gerontology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment. / Oshima, Etsuko; Takenoshita, Shintaro; Iwai, Risa; Yabe, Mayumi; Imai, Nao; Horiuchi, Makiko; Takeda, Naoya; Uchitomi, Yosuke; Yamada, Norihito; Terada, Seishi.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oshima, Etsuko ; Takenoshita, Shintaro ; Iwai, Risa ; Yabe, Mayumi ; Imai, Nao ; Horiuchi, Makiko ; Takeda, Naoya ; Uchitomi, Yosuke ; Yamada, Norihito ; Terada, Seishi. / Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment. In: International Psychogeriatrics. 2019.
@article{358d5c479ecb4d52bdd5b6727da09021,
title = "Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment",
abstract = "Background:In medical practice, a patient's loss of competency is a major obstacle when choosing a treatment and a starting treatment program smoothly. A large number of studies have revealed the lack of medical competency in patients with dementia. However, there have been only a few reports focusing on the capacity of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to make a medical choice.Methods:In this study, we evaluated the competency of 40 patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and 33 normal subjects to make a medical choice using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T). We compared the judgement of a team conference using the recorded semi-structured interview with the clinical judgement of a chief clinician.Results:A team conference concluded that 12 aMCI patients had no competency, and the clinical judgement, without any special interview, judged that five aMCI patients had no competency. All subjects in the control groups were judged to be competent to consent to treatment by both clinicians and the team conference.Conclusions:Without supplementary tools such as explanatory documents, not a few patients with aMCI were judged by a team conference to have no competency to consent to therapy even in a relatively simple and easy case. In contrast, clinical physicians tended to evaluate the competency of aMCI patients in a generous manner.",
keywords = "consent, decision, dementia, MacCAT-T, mild cognitive impairment",
author = "Etsuko Oshima and Shintaro Takenoshita and Risa Iwai and Mayumi Yabe and Nao Imai and Makiko Horiuchi and Naoya Takeda and Yosuke Uchitomi and Norihito Yamada and Seishi Terada",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610219000516",
language = "English",
journal = "International Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment

AU - Oshima, Etsuko

AU - Takenoshita, Shintaro

AU - Iwai, Risa

AU - Yabe, Mayumi

AU - Imai, Nao

AU - Horiuchi, Makiko

AU - Takeda, Naoya

AU - Uchitomi, Yosuke

AU - Yamada, Norihito

AU - Terada, Seishi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background:In medical practice, a patient's loss of competency is a major obstacle when choosing a treatment and a starting treatment program smoothly. A large number of studies have revealed the lack of medical competency in patients with dementia. However, there have been only a few reports focusing on the capacity of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to make a medical choice.Methods:In this study, we evaluated the competency of 40 patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and 33 normal subjects to make a medical choice using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T). We compared the judgement of a team conference using the recorded semi-structured interview with the clinical judgement of a chief clinician.Results:A team conference concluded that 12 aMCI patients had no competency, and the clinical judgement, without any special interview, judged that five aMCI patients had no competency. All subjects in the control groups were judged to be competent to consent to treatment by both clinicians and the team conference.Conclusions:Without supplementary tools such as explanatory documents, not a few patients with aMCI were judged by a team conference to have no competency to consent to therapy even in a relatively simple and easy case. In contrast, clinical physicians tended to evaluate the competency of aMCI patients in a generous manner.

AB - Background:In medical practice, a patient's loss of competency is a major obstacle when choosing a treatment and a starting treatment program smoothly. A large number of studies have revealed the lack of medical competency in patients with dementia. However, there have been only a few reports focusing on the capacity of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to make a medical choice.Methods:In this study, we evaluated the competency of 40 patients with amnestic MCI (aMCI) and 33 normal subjects to make a medical choice using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Treatment (MacCAT-T). We compared the judgement of a team conference using the recorded semi-structured interview with the clinical judgement of a chief clinician.Results:A team conference concluded that 12 aMCI patients had no competency, and the clinical judgement, without any special interview, judged that five aMCI patients had no competency. All subjects in the control groups were judged to be competent to consent to treatment by both clinicians and the team conference.Conclusions:Without supplementary tools such as explanatory documents, not a few patients with aMCI were judged by a team conference to have no competency to consent to therapy even in a relatively simple and easy case. In contrast, clinical physicians tended to evaluate the competency of aMCI patients in a generous manner.

KW - consent

KW - decision

KW - dementia

KW - MacCAT-T

KW - mild cognitive impairment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066896765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066896765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610219000516

DO - 10.1017/S1041610219000516

M3 - Article

JO - International Psychogeriatrics

JF - International Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

ER -