Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening

Kohji Ishihama, Seiji Iida, Tetsuo Kimura, Hidehiko Koizumi, Michikuni Yamazawa, Mikihiko Kogo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of the open surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with bilateral condylar fractures. Sixty-seven (67) patients were treated, and the completed data on 55 patients were reviewed to compare both therapeutic modalities, which consisted of nonsurgical and surgical treatment in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In the nonsurgical group, 23 patients (23/37, 62%) had normal mouth opening. Functional success rate was 79% (15/19) and 44% (8/18) in young adult patients (-29yrs) and older patients (30+yrs), respectively, and there was a significant difference of outcome between the two groups. In nonsurgically treated young patients with disorders, bilateral dislocation and existence of concomitant mandibular fractures were commonly observed. In the open surgical group, seven (7/11, 64%) young adult and three (3/7, 43%) older patients gained normal mouth opening, and no significant difference was observed. Additionally, there was no difference between non-surgical and surgical treatment in any category. Patients undergoing rigid fixation benefited from restoring maximum mouth opening, although there was no significant difference between the rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. Based on these findings, nonrigid fixation should be avoided, and rigid fixation might improve outcome in young adult patients with severe fracture pattern, such as bilateral dislocation and concomitant mandibular fracture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-22
Number of pages7
JournalCranio
Volume25
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mouth
Therapeutics
Mandibular Fractures
Young Adult

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Ishihama, K., Iida, S., Kimura, T., Koizumi, H., Yamazawa, M., & Kogo, M. (2007). Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening. Cranio, 25(1), 16-22.

Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening. / Ishihama, Kohji; Iida, Seiji; Kimura, Tetsuo; Koizumi, Hidehiko; Yamazawa, Michikuni; Kogo, Mikihiko.

In: Cranio, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 16-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ishihama, K, Iida, S, Kimura, T, Koizumi, H, Yamazawa, M & Kogo, M 2007, 'Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening', Cranio, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16-22.
Ishihama, Kohji ; Iida, Seiji ; Kimura, Tetsuo ; Koizumi, Hidehiko ; Yamazawa, Michikuni ; Kogo, Mikihiko. / Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening. In: Cranio. 2007 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 16-22.
@article{7a80d66c77fd43c29dba5700dedd7f98,
title = "Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening",
abstract = "This study presents a comparative analysis of the open surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with bilateral condylar fractures. Sixty-seven (67) patients were treated, and the completed data on 55 patients were reviewed to compare both therapeutic modalities, which consisted of nonsurgical and surgical treatment in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In the nonsurgical group, 23 patients (23/37, 62{\%}) had normal mouth opening. Functional success rate was 79{\%} (15/19) and 44{\%} (8/18) in young adult patients (-29yrs) and older patients (30+yrs), respectively, and there was a significant difference of outcome between the two groups. In nonsurgically treated young patients with disorders, bilateral dislocation and existence of concomitant mandibular fractures were commonly observed. In the open surgical group, seven (7/11, 64{\%}) young adult and three (3/7, 43{\%}) older patients gained normal mouth opening, and no significant difference was observed. Additionally, there was no difference between non-surgical and surgical treatment in any category. Patients undergoing rigid fixation benefited from restoring maximum mouth opening, although there was no significant difference between the rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. Based on these findings, nonrigid fixation should be avoided, and rigid fixation might improve outcome in young adult patients with severe fracture pattern, such as bilateral dislocation and concomitant mandibular fracture.",
author = "Kohji Ishihama and Seiji Iida and Tetsuo Kimura and Hidehiko Koizumi and Michikuni Yamazawa and Mikihiko Kogo",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "16--22",
journal = "Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice",
issn = "0886-9634",
publisher = "Chroma, Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of bilateral condylar fractures based on maximal mouth opening

AU - Ishihama, Kohji

AU - Iida, Seiji

AU - Kimura, Tetsuo

AU - Koizumi, Hidehiko

AU - Yamazawa, Michikuni

AU - Kogo, Mikihiko

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - This study presents a comparative analysis of the open surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with bilateral condylar fractures. Sixty-seven (67) patients were treated, and the completed data on 55 patients were reviewed to compare both therapeutic modalities, which consisted of nonsurgical and surgical treatment in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In the nonsurgical group, 23 patients (23/37, 62%) had normal mouth opening. Functional success rate was 79% (15/19) and 44% (8/18) in young adult patients (-29yrs) and older patients (30+yrs), respectively, and there was a significant difference of outcome between the two groups. In nonsurgically treated young patients with disorders, bilateral dislocation and existence of concomitant mandibular fractures were commonly observed. In the open surgical group, seven (7/11, 64%) young adult and three (3/7, 43%) older patients gained normal mouth opening, and no significant difference was observed. Additionally, there was no difference between non-surgical and surgical treatment in any category. Patients undergoing rigid fixation benefited from restoring maximum mouth opening, although there was no significant difference between the rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. Based on these findings, nonrigid fixation should be avoided, and rigid fixation might improve outcome in young adult patients with severe fracture pattern, such as bilateral dislocation and concomitant mandibular fracture.

AB - This study presents a comparative analysis of the open surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with bilateral condylar fractures. Sixty-seven (67) patients were treated, and the completed data on 55 patients were reviewed to compare both therapeutic modalities, which consisted of nonsurgical and surgical treatment in 37 and 18 patients, respectively. In the nonsurgical group, 23 patients (23/37, 62%) had normal mouth opening. Functional success rate was 79% (15/19) and 44% (8/18) in young adult patients (-29yrs) and older patients (30+yrs), respectively, and there was a significant difference of outcome between the two groups. In nonsurgically treated young patients with disorders, bilateral dislocation and existence of concomitant mandibular fractures were commonly observed. In the open surgical group, seven (7/11, 64%) young adult and three (3/7, 43%) older patients gained normal mouth opening, and no significant difference was observed. Additionally, there was no difference between non-surgical and surgical treatment in any category. Patients undergoing rigid fixation benefited from restoring maximum mouth opening, although there was no significant difference between the rigid and non-rigid fixation groups. Based on these findings, nonrigid fixation should be avoided, and rigid fixation might improve outcome in young adult patients with severe fracture pattern, such as bilateral dislocation and concomitant mandibular fracture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846811585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846811585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 16

EP - 22

JO - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice

JF - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice

SN - 0886-9634

IS - 1

ER -