Comparative Study of Two Different Structures of Collagen Scaffold for Bone Formation

Andrea Paola Rodriguez, Hitoshi Nagatsuka, Bingzhen Huang, Kan Rui, Mika Okauchi, Noriyuki Nagai, Yoshie Kagawa, Missana Liliana, Shinichiro Oida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has not been determined the best scaffold-structure for bone engineering. Because of this, we compared Honeycomb porous structure (HPS) and Interconnected porous structure (IPS) with or without KUSA/ A1 cells implanted in mice. The transplants were subjected to radiological and histological examinations after 1,2,4 and 8 weeks of implantation. KUSA/A1 cells alone showed small islands of new bone. Both scaffolds alone did not reveal any bone induction. KUSA/A1-HPS presented the scaffold partially filled with new bone. In contrast, KUSA/A1-IPS showed the whole scaffold filled with new bone. Our results indicated that cotton structure plays an important role in carrying the cells giving the precise size, shape and comfortable environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-211
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Hard Tissue Biology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Honeycomb porous structure
  • Interconnected porous structure
  • KUSA/A1 cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Biochemistry
  • Biomaterials
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Study of Two Different Structures of Collagen Scaffold for Bone Formation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Rodriguez, A. P., Nagatsuka, H., Huang, B., Rui, K., Okauchi, M., Nagai, N., Kagawa, Y., Liliana, M., & Oida, S. (2005). Comparative Study of Two Different Structures of Collagen Scaffold for Bone Formation. Journal of Hard Tissue Biology, 14(2), 210-211. https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.14.210