TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination therapy with continuous three-in-one femoral nerve block and periarticular multimodal drug infiltration after total hip arthroplasty
AU - Tetsunaga, Tomonori
AU - Tetsunaga, Tomoko
AU - Fujiwara, Kazuo
AU - Endo, Hirosuke
AU - Ozaki, Toshifumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Tomonori Tetsunaga et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background. Various postoperative pain relief modalities, including continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and combination therapy, have been reported for total knee arthroplasty. However, no studies have compared CFNB with LIA for total hip arthroplasty (THA).The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CFNB versus LIA after THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the postoperative outcomes of 93 THA patients (20 men, 73 women; mean age 69.2 years). Patients were divided into three groups according to postoperative analgesic technique: CFNB, LIA, or combined CFNB+LIA.We measured the following postoperative outcome parameters: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, supplemental analgesia, side effects,mobilization, length of hospital stay, andHarrisHip Score (HHS). Results.TheCFNB+LIAgroup had significantly lowerVAS pain scores than the CFNB and LIA groups on postoperative day 1.There were no significant differences among the three groups in use of supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, or HHS at 3 months after THA. Conclusions. Although there were no clinically significant differences in outcomes among the three groups, combination therapy with CFNB and LIA provided better pain relief after THA than CFNB or LIA alone, with few side effects.
AB - Background. Various postoperative pain relief modalities, including continuous femoral nerve block (CFNB), local infiltration analgesia (LIA), and combination therapy, have been reported for total knee arthroplasty. However, no studies have compared CFNB with LIA for total hip arthroplasty (THA).The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CFNB versus LIA after THA. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the postoperative outcomes of 93 THA patients (20 men, 73 women; mean age 69.2 years). Patients were divided into three groups according to postoperative analgesic technique: CFNB, LIA, or combined CFNB+LIA.We measured the following postoperative outcome parameters: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at rest, supplemental analgesia, side effects,mobilization, length of hospital stay, andHarrisHip Score (HHS). Results.TheCFNB+LIAgroup had significantly lowerVAS pain scores than the CFNB and LIA groups on postoperative day 1.There were no significant differences among the three groups in use of supplemental analgesia, side effects, mobilization, length of hospital stay, or HHS at 3 months after THA. Conclusions. Although there were no clinically significant differences in outcomes among the three groups, combination therapy with CFNB and LIA provided better pain relief after THA than CFNB or LIA alone, with few side effects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009146004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009146004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2016/1425201
DO - 10.1155/2016/1425201
M3 - Article
C2 - 28070159
AN - SCOPUS:85009146004
SN - 1203-6765
VL - 2016
JO - Pain Research and Management
JF - Pain Research and Management
M1 - 1425201
ER -