Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction

Yasuhiro Shirakawa, Yoshio Naomoto, Kazuhiro Noma, Kazufumi Sakurama, Toshio Nishikawa, Tetsuji Nobuhisa, Masahiko Kobayashi, Takaomi Okawa, Shinya Asami, Tomoki Yamatsuji, Minoru Haisa, Junji Matsuoka, Motohiko Hanazaki, Kiyoshi Morita, Takao Hiraki, Noriaki Tanaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated the techniques of colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction and discussed the main considerations related to these procedures. Patients and methods: In this study, we performed 51 esophageal reconstructions using colonic interposition. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients had synchronous or allochronic gastric malignancy. We selected colonic interposition for high anastomosis in 11 patients and also for esophageal bypass in 3 patients. This procedure was also selected to preserve gastric function in 5 patients. We recently performed the supercharge technique for colonic interposition in 41 patients. Results: Despite the long duration and multistep nature of the operation procedure, no perioperative complications were noted. The patients returned to a good quality of life. The incidence of postoperative weight loss did not differ significantly between the colonic reconstruction group and the gastric reconstruction group. In terms of heartburn and dumping syndrome, the outcome was markedly better in the colonic reconstruction group (no cases of heartburn or dumping syndrome) than that in the gastric reconstruction group. Conclusion: For reconstruction of the esophagus, the colonic interposition and supercharge technique is advantageous and contributes to the patient's quality of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-23
Number of pages5
JournalLangenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Volume391
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Stomach
Dumping Syndrome
Heartburn
Quality of Life
Esophagus
Weight Loss
Incidence
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Colonic interposition
  • Esophageal cancer
  • Supercharge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction. / Shirakawa, Yasuhiro; Naomoto, Yoshio; Noma, Kazuhiro; Sakurama, Kazufumi; Nishikawa, Toshio; Nobuhisa, Tetsuji; Kobayashi, Masahiko; Okawa, Takaomi; Asami, Shinya; Yamatsuji, Tomoki; Haisa, Minoru; Matsuoka, Junji; Hanazaki, Motohiko; Morita, Kiyoshi; Hiraki, Takao; Tanaka, Noriaki.

In: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, Vol. 391, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 19-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shirakawa, Y, Naomoto, Y, Noma, K, Sakurama, K, Nishikawa, T, Nobuhisa, T, Kobayashi, M, Okawa, T, Asami, S, Yamatsuji, T, Haisa, M, Matsuoka, J, Hanazaki, M, Morita, K, Hiraki, T & Tanaka, N 2006, 'Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction', Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, vol. 391, no. 1, pp. 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8
Shirakawa, Yasuhiro ; Naomoto, Yoshio ; Noma, Kazuhiro ; Sakurama, Kazufumi ; Nishikawa, Toshio ; Nobuhisa, Tetsuji ; Kobayashi, Masahiko ; Okawa, Takaomi ; Asami, Shinya ; Yamatsuji, Tomoki ; Haisa, Minoru ; Matsuoka, Junji ; Hanazaki, Motohiko ; Morita, Kiyoshi ; Hiraki, Takao ; Tanaka, Noriaki. / Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction. In: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 391, No. 1. pp. 19-23.
@article{b08e88a726b043819a01e2c8950633d4,
title = "Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction",
abstract = "Aims: We evaluated the techniques of colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction and discussed the main considerations related to these procedures. Patients and methods: In this study, we performed 51 esophageal reconstructions using colonic interposition. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients had synchronous or allochronic gastric malignancy. We selected colonic interposition for high anastomosis in 11 patients and also for esophageal bypass in 3 patients. This procedure was also selected to preserve gastric function in 5 patients. We recently performed the supercharge technique for colonic interposition in 41 patients. Results: Despite the long duration and multistep nature of the operation procedure, no perioperative complications were noted. The patients returned to a good quality of life. The incidence of postoperative weight loss did not differ significantly between the colonic reconstruction group and the gastric reconstruction group. In terms of heartburn and dumping syndrome, the outcome was markedly better in the colonic reconstruction group (no cases of heartburn or dumping syndrome) than that in the gastric reconstruction group. Conclusion: For reconstruction of the esophagus, the colonic interposition and supercharge technique is advantageous and contributes to the patient's quality of life.",
keywords = "Colonic interposition, Esophageal cancer, Supercharge",
author = "Yasuhiro Shirakawa and Yoshio Naomoto and Kazuhiro Noma and Kazufumi Sakurama and Toshio Nishikawa and Tetsuji Nobuhisa and Masahiko Kobayashi and Takaomi Okawa and Shinya Asami and Tomoki Yamatsuji and Minoru Haisa and Junji Matsuoka and Motohiko Hanazaki and Kiyoshi Morita and Takao Hiraki and Noriaki Tanaka",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8",
language = "English",
volume = "391",
pages = "19--23",
journal = "Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery",
issn = "1435-2443",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction

AU - Shirakawa, Yasuhiro

AU - Naomoto, Yoshio

AU - Noma, Kazuhiro

AU - Sakurama, Kazufumi

AU - Nishikawa, Toshio

AU - Nobuhisa, Tetsuji

AU - Kobayashi, Masahiko

AU - Okawa, Takaomi

AU - Asami, Shinya

AU - Yamatsuji, Tomoki

AU - Haisa, Minoru

AU - Matsuoka, Junji

AU - Hanazaki, Motohiko

AU - Morita, Kiyoshi

AU - Hiraki, Takao

AU - Tanaka, Noriaki

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Aims: We evaluated the techniques of colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction and discussed the main considerations related to these procedures. Patients and methods: In this study, we performed 51 esophageal reconstructions using colonic interposition. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients had synchronous or allochronic gastric malignancy. We selected colonic interposition for high anastomosis in 11 patients and also for esophageal bypass in 3 patients. This procedure was also selected to preserve gastric function in 5 patients. We recently performed the supercharge technique for colonic interposition in 41 patients. Results: Despite the long duration and multistep nature of the operation procedure, no perioperative complications were noted. The patients returned to a good quality of life. The incidence of postoperative weight loss did not differ significantly between the colonic reconstruction group and the gastric reconstruction group. In terms of heartburn and dumping syndrome, the outcome was markedly better in the colonic reconstruction group (no cases of heartburn or dumping syndrome) than that in the gastric reconstruction group. Conclusion: For reconstruction of the esophagus, the colonic interposition and supercharge technique is advantageous and contributes to the patient's quality of life.

AB - Aims: We evaluated the techniques of colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction and discussed the main considerations related to these procedures. Patients and methods: In this study, we performed 51 esophageal reconstructions using colonic interposition. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients had synchronous or allochronic gastric malignancy. We selected colonic interposition for high anastomosis in 11 patients and also for esophageal bypass in 3 patients. This procedure was also selected to preserve gastric function in 5 patients. We recently performed the supercharge technique for colonic interposition in 41 patients. Results: Despite the long duration and multistep nature of the operation procedure, no perioperative complications were noted. The patients returned to a good quality of life. The incidence of postoperative weight loss did not differ significantly between the colonic reconstruction group and the gastric reconstruction group. In terms of heartburn and dumping syndrome, the outcome was markedly better in the colonic reconstruction group (no cases of heartburn or dumping syndrome) than that in the gastric reconstruction group. Conclusion: For reconstruction of the esophagus, the colonic interposition and supercharge technique is advantageous and contributes to the patient's quality of life.

KW - Colonic interposition

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Supercharge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31944442953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31944442953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8

DO - 10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 16411140

AN - SCOPUS:31944442953

VL - 391

SP - 19

EP - 23

JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

SN - 1435-2443

IS - 1

ER -