CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists

Toshio Uraoka, Jun Kato, Motoaki Kuriyama, Keisuke Hori, Shin Ishikawa, Keita Harada, Koji Takemoto, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hideyuki Fujita, Joichiro Horii, Yutaka Saito, Kazuhide Yamamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AIM: To clarify the effectiveness of CO2 insufflation in potentially difficult colonoscopy cases, particularly in relation to the experience level of colonoscopists. METHODS: One hundred twenty potentially difficult cases were included in this study, which involved females with a low body mass index and patients with earlier abdominal and/or pelvic open surgery or previously diagnosed left-side colon diverticulosis. Patients receiving colonoscopy examinations without sedation using a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope were divided into two groups based on either CO2 or standard air insufflation. Both insufflation procedures were also evaluated according to the experience level of the respective colonoscopists who were divided into an experienced colonoscopist (EC) group and a less experienced colonoscopist (LEC) group. Study measurements included a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient pain during and after colonoscopy examinations, in addition to insertion to the cecum and withdrawal times. RESULTS: Examination times did not differ, however, VAS scores in the CO2 group were significantly better than in the air group ( P <0.001, two-way ANOVA) from immediately after the procedure and up to 2 h later. There were no significant differences between either insufflation method in the EC group ( P = 0.29), however, VAS scores for CO2 insufflation were significantly better than air insufflation in the LEC group ( P = 0.023) immediately after colonoscopies and up to 4 h afterwards. CONCLUSION: CO2 insufflation reduced patient pain after colonoscopy in potentially difficult cases when performed by LECs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5186-5192
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume15
Issue number41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Insufflation
Colonoscopy
Air
Visual Analog Scale
Colonoscopes
Cecum
Diverticulum
Pain Measurement
Analysis of Variance
Colon
Body Mass Index
Pediatrics
Pain

Keywords

  • CO insufflation
  • Colonoscopy
  • Difficult colonoscopy
  • Experienced colonoscopist
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies : Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists. / Uraoka, Toshio; Kato, Jun; Kuriyama, Motoaki; Hori, Keisuke; Ishikawa, Shin; Harada, Keita; Takemoto, Koji; Hiraoka, Sakiko; Fujita, Hideyuki; Horii, Joichiro; Saito, Yutaka; Yamamoto, Kazuhide.

In: World Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 15, No. 41, 2009, p. 5186-5192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uraoka, T, Kato, J, Kuriyama, M, Hori, K, Ishikawa, S, Harada, K, Takemoto, K, Hiraoka, S, Fujita, H, Horii, J, Saito, Y & Yamamoto, K 2009, 'CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists', World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 15, no. 41, pp. 5186-5192. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.5186
Uraoka, Toshio ; Kato, Jun ; Kuriyama, Motoaki ; Hori, Keisuke ; Ishikawa, Shin ; Harada, Keita ; Takemoto, Koji ; Hiraoka, Sakiko ; Fujita, Hideyuki ; Horii, Joichiro ; Saito, Yutaka ; Yamamoto, Kazuhide. / CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies : Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists. In: World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009 ; Vol. 15, No. 41. pp. 5186-5192.
@article{01db853774ac46c3945a6f55bf553d79,
title = "CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies: Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists",
abstract = "AIM: To clarify the effectiveness of CO2 insufflation in potentially difficult colonoscopy cases, particularly in relation to the experience level of colonoscopists. METHODS: One hundred twenty potentially difficult cases were included in this study, which involved females with a low body mass index and patients with earlier abdominal and/or pelvic open surgery or previously diagnosed left-side colon diverticulosis. Patients receiving colonoscopy examinations without sedation using a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope were divided into two groups based on either CO2 or standard air insufflation. Both insufflation procedures were also evaluated according to the experience level of the respective colonoscopists who were divided into an experienced colonoscopist (EC) group and a less experienced colonoscopist (LEC) group. Study measurements included a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient pain during and after colonoscopy examinations, in addition to insertion to the cecum and withdrawal times. RESULTS: Examination times did not differ, however, VAS scores in the CO2 group were significantly better than in the air group ( P <0.001, two-way ANOVA) from immediately after the procedure and up to 2 h later. There were no significant differences between either insufflation method in the EC group ( P = 0.29), however, VAS scores for CO2 insufflation were significantly better than air insufflation in the LEC group ( P = 0.023) immediately after colonoscopies and up to 4 h afterwards. CONCLUSION: CO2 insufflation reduced patient pain after colonoscopy in potentially difficult cases when performed by LECs.",
keywords = "CO insufflation, Colonoscopy, Difficult colonoscopy, Experienced colonoscopist, Training",
author = "Toshio Uraoka and Jun Kato and Motoaki Kuriyama and Keisuke Hori and Shin Ishikawa and Keita Harada and Koji Takemoto and Sakiko Hiraoka and Hideyuki Fujita and Joichiro Horii and Yutaka Saito and Kazuhide Yamamoto",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.3748/wjg.15.5186",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "5186--5192",
journal = "World Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "1007-9327",
publisher = "WJG Press",
number = "41",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CO2 insufflation for potentially difficult colonoscopies

T2 - Efficacy when used by less experienced colonoscopists

AU - Uraoka, Toshio

AU - Kato, Jun

AU - Kuriyama, Motoaki

AU - Hori, Keisuke

AU - Ishikawa, Shin

AU - Harada, Keita

AU - Takemoto, Koji

AU - Hiraoka, Sakiko

AU - Fujita, Hideyuki

AU - Horii, Joichiro

AU - Saito, Yutaka

AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhide

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - AIM: To clarify the effectiveness of CO2 insufflation in potentially difficult colonoscopy cases, particularly in relation to the experience level of colonoscopists. METHODS: One hundred twenty potentially difficult cases were included in this study, which involved females with a low body mass index and patients with earlier abdominal and/or pelvic open surgery or previously diagnosed left-side colon diverticulosis. Patients receiving colonoscopy examinations without sedation using a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope were divided into two groups based on either CO2 or standard air insufflation. Both insufflation procedures were also evaluated according to the experience level of the respective colonoscopists who were divided into an experienced colonoscopist (EC) group and a less experienced colonoscopist (LEC) group. Study measurements included a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient pain during and after colonoscopy examinations, in addition to insertion to the cecum and withdrawal times. RESULTS: Examination times did not differ, however, VAS scores in the CO2 group were significantly better than in the air group ( P <0.001, two-way ANOVA) from immediately after the procedure and up to 2 h later. There were no significant differences between either insufflation method in the EC group ( P = 0.29), however, VAS scores for CO2 insufflation were significantly better than air insufflation in the LEC group ( P = 0.023) immediately after colonoscopies and up to 4 h afterwards. CONCLUSION: CO2 insufflation reduced patient pain after colonoscopy in potentially difficult cases when performed by LECs.

AB - AIM: To clarify the effectiveness of CO2 insufflation in potentially difficult colonoscopy cases, particularly in relation to the experience level of colonoscopists. METHODS: One hundred twenty potentially difficult cases were included in this study, which involved females with a low body mass index and patients with earlier abdominal and/or pelvic open surgery or previously diagnosed left-side colon diverticulosis. Patients receiving colonoscopy examinations without sedation using a pediatric variable-stiffness colonoscope were divided into two groups based on either CO2 or standard air insufflation. Both insufflation procedures were also evaluated according to the experience level of the respective colonoscopists who were divided into an experienced colonoscopist (EC) group and a less experienced colonoscopist (LEC) group. Study measurements included a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient pain during and after colonoscopy examinations, in addition to insertion to the cecum and withdrawal times. RESULTS: Examination times did not differ, however, VAS scores in the CO2 group were significantly better than in the air group ( P <0.001, two-way ANOVA) from immediately after the procedure and up to 2 h later. There were no significant differences between either insufflation method in the EC group ( P = 0.29), however, VAS scores for CO2 insufflation were significantly better than air insufflation in the LEC group ( P = 0.023) immediately after colonoscopies and up to 4 h afterwards. CONCLUSION: CO2 insufflation reduced patient pain after colonoscopy in potentially difficult cases when performed by LECs.

KW - CO insufflation

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Difficult colonoscopy

KW - Experienced colonoscopist

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73449139752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73449139752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3748/wjg.15.5186

DO - 10.3748/wjg.15.5186

M3 - Article

C2 - 19891018

AN - SCOPUS:73449139752

VL - 15

SP - 5186

EP - 5192

JO - World Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - World Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 1007-9327

IS - 41

ER -