Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination: Too much of a good thing

Hideharu Hagiya, Nanoka Yoneda, Keigo Kimura, Tomomi Mitsui, Akiko Ueda, Atsuko Sunada, Isao Nishi, Futoshi Nakagami, Hiromi Rakugi, Kazunori Tomono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Blood culture is the most critical examination for diagnosing bacterial infections. The longer the blood culture incubation period, the higher the chances of identifying bacterial strains. However, unnecessary extension of the incubation period can burden the capacity of the instrument and merely result in the detection of contaminant bacteria having no clinical significance. This study aimed to optimize the blood culture incubation period using the currently available continuous-monitoring automated blood culture instrument. This was a 2-year retrospective study performed at Osaka University Hospital (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). The BD BACTEC™ FX blood culture system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA)and BD BACTEC™ Plus series blood culture bottles were used. All blood cultures were incubated for more than 12 consecutive days. We reviewed the clinical data of cases that tested positive between 6 and 12 days of incubation. During the study period, 14,822 sets of blood culture were drawn. Of 1751 sets testing positive, 95.7% (1665 sets)became positive within 5 days of incubation. The overall contamination rate (false positives)after 6 days of incubation was 80.2% (69/86 sets). Based on the positive blood culture results, antimicrobials were changed in 7.0% (6/86)of the sets, and a diagnosis of infectious disease was made in only one case. There was no death associated with the extended blood culture results. In conclusion, the clinical impact of extended blood culture incubation for 6 days or more was limited, and a routine extension of the incubation period might be unnecessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-562
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Culture
Bacterial Infections
Communicable Diseases
Retrospective Studies
Bacteria

Keywords

  • Blood culture
  • Contamination
  • Extended incubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination : Too much of a good thing. / Hagiya, Hideharu; Yoneda, Nanoka; Kimura, Keigo; Mitsui, Tomomi; Ueda, Akiko; Sunada, Atsuko; Nishi, Isao; Nakagami, Futoshi; Rakugi, Hiromi; Tomono, Kazunori.

In: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, Vol. 25, No. 7, 07.2019, p. 559-562.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hagiya, H, Yoneda, N, Kimura, K, Mitsui, T, Ueda, A, Sunada, A, Nishi, I, Nakagami, F, Rakugi, H & Tomono, K 2019, 'Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination: Too much of a good thing', Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 559-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2019.03.001
Hagiya, Hideharu ; Yoneda, Nanoka ; Kimura, Keigo ; Mitsui, Tomomi ; Ueda, Akiko ; Sunada, Atsuko ; Nishi, Isao ; Nakagami, Futoshi ; Rakugi, Hiromi ; Tomono, Kazunori. / Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination : Too much of a good thing. In: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2019 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 559-562.
@article{1ee058800b2c46e1bd17af6ec18d8ebd,
title = "Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination: Too much of a good thing",
abstract = "Blood culture is the most critical examination for diagnosing bacterial infections. The longer the blood culture incubation period, the higher the chances of identifying bacterial strains. However, unnecessary extension of the incubation period can burden the capacity of the instrument and merely result in the detection of contaminant bacteria having no clinical significance. This study aimed to optimize the blood culture incubation period using the currently available continuous-monitoring automated blood culture instrument. This was a 2-year retrospective study performed at Osaka University Hospital (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). The BD BACTEC™ FX blood culture system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA)and BD BACTEC™ Plus series blood culture bottles were used. All blood cultures were incubated for more than 12 consecutive days. We reviewed the clinical data of cases that tested positive between 6 and 12 days of incubation. During the study period, 14,822 sets of blood culture were drawn. Of 1751 sets testing positive, 95.7{\%} (1665 sets)became positive within 5 days of incubation. The overall contamination rate (false positives)after 6 days of incubation was 80.2{\%} (69/86 sets). Based on the positive blood culture results, antimicrobials were changed in 7.0{\%} (6/86)of the sets, and a diagnosis of infectious disease was made in only one case. There was no death associated with the extended blood culture results. In conclusion, the clinical impact of extended blood culture incubation for 6 days or more was limited, and a routine extension of the incubation period might be unnecessary.",
keywords = "Blood culture, Contamination, Extended incubation",
author = "Hideharu Hagiya and Nanoka Yoneda and Keigo Kimura and Tomomi Mitsui and Akiko Ueda and Atsuko Sunada and Isao Nishi and Futoshi Nakagami and Hiromi Rakugi and Kazunori Tomono",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jiac.2019.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "559--562",
journal = "Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy",
issn = "1341-321X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical impact of extended blood culture examination

T2 - Too much of a good thing

AU - Hagiya, Hideharu

AU - Yoneda, Nanoka

AU - Kimura, Keigo

AU - Mitsui, Tomomi

AU - Ueda, Akiko

AU - Sunada, Atsuko

AU - Nishi, Isao

AU - Nakagami, Futoshi

AU - Rakugi, Hiromi

AU - Tomono, Kazunori

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Blood culture is the most critical examination for diagnosing bacterial infections. The longer the blood culture incubation period, the higher the chances of identifying bacterial strains. However, unnecessary extension of the incubation period can burden the capacity of the instrument and merely result in the detection of contaminant bacteria having no clinical significance. This study aimed to optimize the blood culture incubation period using the currently available continuous-monitoring automated blood culture instrument. This was a 2-year retrospective study performed at Osaka University Hospital (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). The BD BACTEC™ FX blood culture system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA)and BD BACTEC™ Plus series blood culture bottles were used. All blood cultures were incubated for more than 12 consecutive days. We reviewed the clinical data of cases that tested positive between 6 and 12 days of incubation. During the study period, 14,822 sets of blood culture were drawn. Of 1751 sets testing positive, 95.7% (1665 sets)became positive within 5 days of incubation. The overall contamination rate (false positives)after 6 days of incubation was 80.2% (69/86 sets). Based on the positive blood culture results, antimicrobials were changed in 7.0% (6/86)of the sets, and a diagnosis of infectious disease was made in only one case. There was no death associated with the extended blood culture results. In conclusion, the clinical impact of extended blood culture incubation for 6 days or more was limited, and a routine extension of the incubation period might be unnecessary.

AB - Blood culture is the most critical examination for diagnosing bacterial infections. The longer the blood culture incubation period, the higher the chances of identifying bacterial strains. However, unnecessary extension of the incubation period can burden the capacity of the instrument and merely result in the detection of contaminant bacteria having no clinical significance. This study aimed to optimize the blood culture incubation period using the currently available continuous-monitoring automated blood culture instrument. This was a 2-year retrospective study performed at Osaka University Hospital (January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017). The BD BACTEC™ FX blood culture system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA)and BD BACTEC™ Plus series blood culture bottles were used. All blood cultures were incubated for more than 12 consecutive days. We reviewed the clinical data of cases that tested positive between 6 and 12 days of incubation. During the study period, 14,822 sets of blood culture were drawn. Of 1751 sets testing positive, 95.7% (1665 sets)became positive within 5 days of incubation. The overall contamination rate (false positives)after 6 days of incubation was 80.2% (69/86 sets). Based on the positive blood culture results, antimicrobials were changed in 7.0% (6/86)of the sets, and a diagnosis of infectious disease was made in only one case. There was no death associated with the extended blood culture results. In conclusion, the clinical impact of extended blood culture incubation for 6 days or more was limited, and a routine extension of the incubation period might be unnecessary.

KW - Blood culture

KW - Contamination

KW - Extended incubation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063063611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063063611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.03.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 30904462

AN - SCOPUS:85063063611

VL - 25

SP - 559

EP - 562

JO - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

JF - Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy

SN - 1341-321X

IS - 7

ER -