Causes of difficulty in duration judgments: Comment on francuz and oleś (2011)

Yoshihiro Okazaki, Matsuda Fumiko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2011, Okazaki and Matsuda showed in studies that college students could not correctly estimate the duration of movement of two objects. Fancuz and Oleś (2011) proposed two explanations of the observed task difficulty. First, they suggested that the cause of the difficulty for the duration judgments involved the experimental procedure, which may have overloaded the cognitive capacities of these students. This study presents results that indicate there was no overload. Second, because the training was intended to improve response accuracy, but it failed to significantly increase accuracy rates, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) suggested there was insufficient time for learning about the task. With respect to these results, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) are correct in pointing out that the training duration could be an issue.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)725-728
Number of pages4
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
Learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Causes of difficulty in duration judgments : Comment on francuz and oleś (2011). / Okazaki, Yoshihiro; Fumiko, Matsuda.

In: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 115, No. 3, 12.2012, p. 725-728.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c232d47b56644a3983ef91613af0fd91,
title = "Causes of difficulty in duration judgments: Comment on francuz and oleś (2011)",
abstract = "In 2011, Okazaki and Matsuda showed in studies that college students could not correctly estimate the duration of movement of two objects. Fancuz and Oleś (2011) proposed two explanations of the observed task difficulty. First, they suggested that the cause of the difficulty for the duration judgments involved the experimental procedure, which may have overloaded the cognitive capacities of these students. This study presents results that indicate there was no overload. Second, because the training was intended to improve response accuracy, but it failed to significantly increase accuracy rates, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) suggested there was insufficient time for learning about the task. With respect to these results, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) are correct in pointing out that the training duration could be an issue.",
author = "Yoshihiro Okazaki and Matsuda Fumiko",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.2466/22.PMS.115.6.725-728",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "725--728",
journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
issn = "0031-5125",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causes of difficulty in duration judgments

T2 - Comment on francuz and oleś (2011)

AU - Okazaki, Yoshihiro

AU - Fumiko, Matsuda

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - In 2011, Okazaki and Matsuda showed in studies that college students could not correctly estimate the duration of movement of two objects. Fancuz and Oleś (2011) proposed two explanations of the observed task difficulty. First, they suggested that the cause of the difficulty for the duration judgments involved the experimental procedure, which may have overloaded the cognitive capacities of these students. This study presents results that indicate there was no overload. Second, because the training was intended to improve response accuracy, but it failed to significantly increase accuracy rates, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) suggested there was insufficient time for learning about the task. With respect to these results, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) are correct in pointing out that the training duration could be an issue.

AB - In 2011, Okazaki and Matsuda showed in studies that college students could not correctly estimate the duration of movement of two objects. Fancuz and Oleś (2011) proposed two explanations of the observed task difficulty. First, they suggested that the cause of the difficulty for the duration judgments involved the experimental procedure, which may have overloaded the cognitive capacities of these students. This study presents results that indicate there was no overload. Second, because the training was intended to improve response accuracy, but it failed to significantly increase accuracy rates, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) suggested there was insufficient time for learning about the task. With respect to these results, Fancuz and Oleś (2011) are correct in pointing out that the training duration could be an issue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872162161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872162161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/22.PMS.115.6.725-728

DO - 10.2466/22.PMS.115.6.725-728

M3 - Article

C2 - 23409586

AN - SCOPUS:84872162161

VL - 115

SP - 725

EP - 728

JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

SN - 0031-5125

IS - 3

ER -