Can SRI funds better resist global financial crisis? Evidence from Japan

Miwa Nakai, Keiko Yamaguchi, Kenji Takeuchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compared Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) funds and conventional funds in the Japanese market with respect to the impact of the global financial crisis in 2008. Taking the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers as a particular event, we estimated the average cumulative abnormal returns of both funds by event study methodology using a Fama–French three-factor model and EGARCH model. Our results suggest that SRI funds better resisted the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers than conventional funds. We also found that this result can be attributed to the existence of international funds, possibly because investors might evaluate the CSR activities of international firms more than those of domestic firms. Alternatively, it can be interpreted that the universe of domestic SRI funds is too limited to enjoy risk diversification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-20
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Review of Financial Analysis
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Investment funds
Japan
Global financial crisis
Socially responsible investment
Bankruptcy
Event study methodology
Investors
Domestic firms
Fama-French three-factor model
EGARCH model
Risk diversification
Corporate Social Responsibility
Cumulative abnormal return

Keywords

  • Event study
  • Financial crisis
  • Socially responsible investment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Can SRI funds better resist global financial crisis? Evidence from Japan. / Nakai, Miwa; Yamaguchi, Keiko; Takeuchi, Kenji.

In: International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 48, 01.12.2016, p. 12-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f767e38fa8c54b8ca0822792ad812efb,
title = "Can SRI funds better resist global financial crisis? Evidence from Japan",
abstract = "This paper compared Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) funds and conventional funds in the Japanese market with respect to the impact of the global financial crisis in 2008. Taking the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers as a particular event, we estimated the average cumulative abnormal returns of both funds by event study methodology using a Fama–French three-factor model and EGARCH model. Our results suggest that SRI funds better resisted the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers than conventional funds. We also found that this result can be attributed to the existence of international funds, possibly because investors might evaluate the CSR activities of international firms more than those of domestic firms. Alternatively, it can be interpreted that the universe of domestic SRI funds is too limited to enjoy risk diversification.",
keywords = "Event study, Financial crisis, Socially responsible investment",
author = "Miwa Nakai and Keiko Yamaguchi and Kenji Takeuchi",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.irfa.2016.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "12--20",
journal = "International Review of Financial Analysis",
issn = "1057-5219",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can SRI funds better resist global financial crisis? Evidence from Japan

AU - Nakai, Miwa

AU - Yamaguchi, Keiko

AU - Takeuchi, Kenji

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - This paper compared Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) funds and conventional funds in the Japanese market with respect to the impact of the global financial crisis in 2008. Taking the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers as a particular event, we estimated the average cumulative abnormal returns of both funds by event study methodology using a Fama–French three-factor model and EGARCH model. Our results suggest that SRI funds better resisted the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers than conventional funds. We also found that this result can be attributed to the existence of international funds, possibly because investors might evaluate the CSR activities of international firms more than those of domestic firms. Alternatively, it can be interpreted that the universe of domestic SRI funds is too limited to enjoy risk diversification.

AB - This paper compared Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) funds and conventional funds in the Japanese market with respect to the impact of the global financial crisis in 2008. Taking the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers as a particular event, we estimated the average cumulative abnormal returns of both funds by event study methodology using a Fama–French three-factor model and EGARCH model. Our results suggest that SRI funds better resisted the bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers than conventional funds. We also found that this result can be attributed to the existence of international funds, possibly because investors might evaluate the CSR activities of international firms more than those of domestic firms. Alternatively, it can be interpreted that the universe of domestic SRI funds is too limited to enjoy risk diversification.

KW - Event study

KW - Financial crisis

KW - Socially responsible investment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995449788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995449788&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.irfa.2016.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.irfa.2016.09.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84995449788

VL - 48

SP - 12

EP - 20

JO - International Review of Financial Analysis

JF - International Review of Financial Analysis

SN - 1057-5219

ER -