Breakage of internal maxillary distractor: considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis

Tomonao Aikawa, Seiji Iida, Emiko T. Isomura, Mari Namikawa, Yudai Matsuoka, Chiaki Yamada, Taku Yamamoto, Yoko Takigawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using intraoral distractors is now one of the standard treatments of maxillary retrusion. This report shows 2 cases of breakage of this internal maxillary distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate; one was observed during the distraction period and the other was during the retention period. The first case required a rotational movement of the distraction segment, and this movement caused the laterally dislocation of the posterior part of the distractor, where the distractor suffered some mechanical forces by mouth opening. In the latter case, breakage of distractor was observed on the radiographs taken 3 months after distraction and this complication may have been caused by mechanical force by occlusion and mastication. Both breakages were found at the joint of the anchorage plate and the extension rod, which has some flexibility for adjusting the plate to the bone surface. Therefore, surgeons should pay special attention for this mechanical weak area in this distractor not only during the advancement period, but also during the retention period and should avoid unnecessary frequent bending for adopting the bone surface, which directly weakens the joint.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Distraction Osteogenesis
Joints
Retrognathia
Bone Plates
Cleft Lip
Mastication
Cleft Palate
Mouth
Bone and Bones
Therapeutics
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Surgery
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Breakage of internal maxillary distractor : considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis. / Aikawa, Tomonao; Iida, Seiji; Isomura, Emiko T.; Namikawa, Mari; Matsuoka, Yudai; Yamada, Chiaki; Yamamoto, Taku; Takigawa, Yoko.

In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, Vol. 106, No. 1, 07.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aikawa, Tomonao ; Iida, Seiji ; Isomura, Emiko T. ; Namikawa, Mari ; Matsuoka, Yudai ; Yamada, Chiaki ; Yamamoto, Taku ; Takigawa, Yoko. / Breakage of internal maxillary distractor : considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis. In: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics. 2008 ; Vol. 106, No. 1.
@article{f1bd3595eae549148a341f2ef1bab6b9,
title = "Breakage of internal maxillary distractor: considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis",
abstract = "Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using intraoral distractors is now one of the standard treatments of maxillary retrusion. This report shows 2 cases of breakage of this internal maxillary distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate; one was observed during the distraction period and the other was during the retention period. The first case required a rotational movement of the distraction segment, and this movement caused the laterally dislocation of the posterior part of the distractor, where the distractor suffered some mechanical forces by mouth opening. In the latter case, breakage of distractor was observed on the radiographs taken 3 months after distraction and this complication may have been caused by mechanical force by occlusion and mastication. Both breakages were found at the joint of the anchorage plate and the extension rod, which has some flexibility for adjusting the plate to the bone surface. Therefore, surgeons should pay special attention for this mechanical weak area in this distractor not only during the advancement period, but also during the retention period and should avoid unnecessary frequent bending for adopting the bone surface, which directly weakens the joint.",
author = "Tomonao Aikawa and Seiji Iida and Isomura, {Emiko T.} and Mari Namikawa and Yudai Matsuoka and Chiaki Yamada and Taku Yamamoto and Yoko Takigawa",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.035",
language = "English",
volume = "106",
journal = "Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology",
issn = "2212-4403",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breakage of internal maxillary distractor

T2 - considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis

AU - Aikawa, Tomonao

AU - Iida, Seiji

AU - Isomura, Emiko T.

AU - Namikawa, Mari

AU - Matsuoka, Yudai

AU - Yamada, Chiaki

AU - Yamamoto, Taku

AU - Takigawa, Yoko

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using intraoral distractors is now one of the standard treatments of maxillary retrusion. This report shows 2 cases of breakage of this internal maxillary distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate; one was observed during the distraction period and the other was during the retention period. The first case required a rotational movement of the distraction segment, and this movement caused the laterally dislocation of the posterior part of the distractor, where the distractor suffered some mechanical forces by mouth opening. In the latter case, breakage of distractor was observed on the radiographs taken 3 months after distraction and this complication may have been caused by mechanical force by occlusion and mastication. Both breakages were found at the joint of the anchorage plate and the extension rod, which has some flexibility for adjusting the plate to the bone surface. Therefore, surgeons should pay special attention for this mechanical weak area in this distractor not only during the advancement period, but also during the retention period and should avoid unnecessary frequent bending for adopting the bone surface, which directly weakens the joint.

AB - Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using intraoral distractors is now one of the standard treatments of maxillary retrusion. This report shows 2 cases of breakage of this internal maxillary distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate; one was observed during the distraction period and the other was during the retention period. The first case required a rotational movement of the distraction segment, and this movement caused the laterally dislocation of the posterior part of the distractor, where the distractor suffered some mechanical forces by mouth opening. In the latter case, breakage of distractor was observed on the radiographs taken 3 months after distraction and this complication may have been caused by mechanical force by occlusion and mastication. Both breakages were found at the joint of the anchorage plate and the extension rod, which has some flexibility for adjusting the plate to the bone surface. Therefore, surgeons should pay special attention for this mechanical weak area in this distractor not only during the advancement period, but also during the retention period and should avoid unnecessary frequent bending for adopting the bone surface, which directly weakens the joint.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45949086680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45949086680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.035

DO - 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 18585604

AN - SCOPUS:45949086680

VL - 106

JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology

SN - 2212-4403

IS - 1

ER -