Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel

Pisol Senawongse, Vanthana Sattabanasuk, Yasushi Shimada, Masayuki Otsuki, Junji Tagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the microshear bond strengths of current adhesive systems to intact and ground enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Three commercially adhesive materials were examined: a two-step total-etching self-priming system (Single Bond®, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), a two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond®, Kuraray Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and an all-in-one system (One-Up Bond® F, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan). The labial surfaces of extracted human incisors were used. For intact enamel surfaces, the teeth were polished with pumice. However, for the ground enamel, 0.5 mm deep, flat enamel surfaces at the midlabial aspect were ground with a no. 600 grit silicon carbide paper. Ground and intact enamel surfaces were bonded with one of three bonding systems and a resin composite and were subjected to a microshear bond test. Results: The two self-etching systems demonstrated lower bond strengths than did the total-etching system on intact enamel (One-Up Bond F, 18.59 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 35.71 MPa; Single Bond, 47.20 MPa). No significant difference was found between the total-etching system and the two-step self-etching system on ground enamel (One-Up Bond F, 28.96 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 48.51 MPa; Single Bond, 51.07 MPa). Shear bond strengths on ground enamel were significantly higher than those on intact enamel except for the group that was bonded with the total-etching system. Conclusions: The two-step adhesives showed significantly higher bond strengths than did the one-step adhesive. When applying the total-etching system, no significant differences in bond strength were demonstrated between bonding to intact and to ground enamel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-115
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Volume16
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Tooth
Japan
Shear Strength
Tokyo
Composite Resins
Incisor
Lip

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Senawongse, P., Sattabanasuk, V., Shimada, Y., Otsuki, M., & Tagami, J. (2004). Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 16(2), 107-115.

Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. / Senawongse, Pisol; Sattabanasuk, Vanthana; Shimada, Yasushi; Otsuki, Masayuki; Tagami, Junji.

In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, p. 107-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Senawongse, P, Sattabanasuk, V, Shimada, Y, Otsuki, M & Tagami, J 2004, 'Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel', Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 107-115.
Senawongse, Pisol ; Sattabanasuk, Vanthana ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Otsuki, Masayuki ; Tagami, Junji. / Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel. In: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2004 ; Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 107-115.
@article{535027a4f0e84f14b22744f5589012cf,
title = "Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel",
abstract = "Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the microshear bond strengths of current adhesive systems to intact and ground enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Three commercially adhesive materials were examined: a two-step total-etching self-priming system (Single Bond{\circledR}, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), a two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond{\circledR}, Kuraray Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and an all-in-one system (One-Up Bond{\circledR} F, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan). The labial surfaces of extracted human incisors were used. For intact enamel surfaces, the teeth were polished with pumice. However, for the ground enamel, 0.5 mm deep, flat enamel surfaces at the midlabial aspect were ground with a no. 600 grit silicon carbide paper. Ground and intact enamel surfaces were bonded with one of three bonding systems and a resin composite and were subjected to a microshear bond test. Results: The two self-etching systems demonstrated lower bond strengths than did the total-etching system on intact enamel (One-Up Bond F, 18.59 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 35.71 MPa; Single Bond, 47.20 MPa). No significant difference was found between the total-etching system and the two-step self-etching system on ground enamel (One-Up Bond F, 28.96 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 48.51 MPa; Single Bond, 51.07 MPa). Shear bond strengths on ground enamel were significantly higher than those on intact enamel except for the group that was bonded with the total-etching system. Conclusions: The two-step adhesives showed significantly higher bond strengths than did the one-step adhesive. When applying the total-etching system, no significant differences in bond strength were demonstrated between bonding to intact and to ground enamel.",
author = "Pisol Senawongse and Vanthana Sattabanasuk and Yasushi Shimada and Masayuki Otsuki and Junji Tagami",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "107--115",
journal = "Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry",
issn = "1496-4155",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bond strengths of current adhesive systems on intact and ground enamel

AU - Senawongse, Pisol

AU - Sattabanasuk, Vanthana

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Otsuki, Masayuki

AU - Tagami, Junji

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the microshear bond strengths of current adhesive systems to intact and ground enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Three commercially adhesive materials were examined: a two-step total-etching self-priming system (Single Bond®, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), a two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond®, Kuraray Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and an all-in-one system (One-Up Bond® F, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan). The labial surfaces of extracted human incisors were used. For intact enamel surfaces, the teeth were polished with pumice. However, for the ground enamel, 0.5 mm deep, flat enamel surfaces at the midlabial aspect were ground with a no. 600 grit silicon carbide paper. Ground and intact enamel surfaces were bonded with one of three bonding systems and a resin composite and were subjected to a microshear bond test. Results: The two self-etching systems demonstrated lower bond strengths than did the total-etching system on intact enamel (One-Up Bond F, 18.59 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 35.71 MPa; Single Bond, 47.20 MPa). No significant difference was found between the total-etching system and the two-step self-etching system on ground enamel (One-Up Bond F, 28.96 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 48.51 MPa; Single Bond, 51.07 MPa). Shear bond strengths on ground enamel were significantly higher than those on intact enamel except for the group that was bonded with the total-etching system. Conclusions: The two-step adhesives showed significantly higher bond strengths than did the one-step adhesive. When applying the total-etching system, no significant differences in bond strength were demonstrated between bonding to intact and to ground enamel.

AB - Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the microshear bond strengths of current adhesive systems to intact and ground enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Three commercially adhesive materials were examined: a two-step total-etching self-priming system (Single Bond®, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), a two-step self-etching system (Clearfil SE Bond®, Kuraray Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and an all-in-one system (One-Up Bond® F, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan). The labial surfaces of extracted human incisors were used. For intact enamel surfaces, the teeth were polished with pumice. However, for the ground enamel, 0.5 mm deep, flat enamel surfaces at the midlabial aspect were ground with a no. 600 grit silicon carbide paper. Ground and intact enamel surfaces were bonded with one of three bonding systems and a resin composite and were subjected to a microshear bond test. Results: The two self-etching systems demonstrated lower bond strengths than did the total-etching system on intact enamel (One-Up Bond F, 18.59 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 35.71 MPa; Single Bond, 47.20 MPa). No significant difference was found between the total-etching system and the two-step self-etching system on ground enamel (One-Up Bond F, 28.96 MPa; Clearfil SE Bond, 48.51 MPa; Single Bond, 51.07 MPa). Shear bond strengths on ground enamel were significantly higher than those on intact enamel except for the group that was bonded with the total-etching system. Conclusions: The two-step adhesives showed significantly higher bond strengths than did the one-step adhesive. When applying the total-etching system, no significant differences in bond strength were demonstrated between bonding to intact and to ground enamel.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4143079330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4143079330&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15500060

AN - SCOPUS:4143079330

VL - 16

SP - 107

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

JF - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

SN - 1496-4155

IS - 2

ER -