Biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation and conventional posterior plate fixation in unstable vertical sacral fracture

Kensuke Shinohara, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Masato Tanaka, Yoshihisa Sugimoto, Shinya Arataki, Yasuo Ito, Toshihumi Ozaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vertical sacral fracture is one of the most difficult fractures to treat. Posterior fixation using spinal dual rods is a novel method for treating this fracture, but its biomechanical strength has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength produced by posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation. Sacral fractures were created in eight pelvic bone models and classified into a posterior plate fixation group [P group, n=4] and a spinal instrumentation group [R group, n=4]. The biomechanical strength was tested by pushing down on the S1 vertebra from the top. The mean maximum loads were 1,057.4 N and 1,489.4 N in the P and R groups, respectively (p= 0.014). The loads applied to the construct at displacements of 5mm and 7.5mm from the start of the universal testing machine loading were also significantly higher in the R group. The mean stiffness levels in the P and R groups were 88.3N/mm and 119.6N/mm, respectively (p=0.014). Posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation is biomechanically stronger than conventional posterior plate fixation. This procedure may be the optimal method for treating unstable sacral fracture fixation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-102
Number of pages6
JournalActa Medica Okayama
Volume70
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Pelvic Bones
Fracture Fixation
Fracture fixation
Spine
Bone
Stiffness
Testing

Keywords

  • Biomechanical comparison
  • Posterior fixation
  • Sacral fracture
  • Spinal instrumentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation and conventional posterior plate fixation in unstable vertical sacral fracture. / Shinohara, Kensuke; Takigawa, Tomoyuki; Tanaka, Masato; Sugimoto, Yoshihisa; Arataki, Shinya; Ito, Yasuo; Ozaki, Toshihumi.

In: Acta Medica Okayama, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2016, p. 97-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{62912b1a303f4c88b1ee13d29ed35dcb,
title = "Biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation and conventional posterior plate fixation in unstable vertical sacral fracture",
abstract = "Vertical sacral fracture is one of the most difficult fractures to treat. Posterior fixation using spinal dual rods is a novel method for treating this fracture, but its biomechanical strength has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength produced by posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation. Sacral fractures were created in eight pelvic bone models and classified into a posterior plate fixation group [P group, n=4] and a spinal instrumentation group [R group, n=4]. The biomechanical strength was tested by pushing down on the S1 vertebra from the top. The mean maximum loads were 1,057.4 N and 1,489.4 N in the P and R groups, respectively (p= 0.014). The loads applied to the construct at displacements of 5mm and 7.5mm from the start of the universal testing machine loading were also significantly higher in the R group. The mean stiffness levels in the P and R groups were 88.3N/mm and 119.6N/mm, respectively (p=0.014). Posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation is biomechanically stronger than conventional posterior plate fixation. This procedure may be the optimal method for treating unstable sacral fracture fixation.",
keywords = "Biomechanical comparison, Posterior fixation, Sacral fracture, Spinal instrumentation",
author = "Kensuke Shinohara and Tomoyuki Takigawa and Masato Tanaka and Yoshihisa Sugimoto and Shinya Arataki and Yasuo Ito and Toshihumi Ozaki",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "97--102",
journal = "Acta Medica Okayama",
issn = "0386-300X",
publisher = "Okayama University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical comparison of posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation and conventional posterior plate fixation in unstable vertical sacral fracture

AU - Shinohara, Kensuke

AU - Takigawa, Tomoyuki

AU - Tanaka, Masato

AU - Sugimoto, Yoshihisa

AU - Arataki, Shinya

AU - Ito, Yasuo

AU - Ozaki, Toshihumi

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Vertical sacral fracture is one of the most difficult fractures to treat. Posterior fixation using spinal dual rods is a novel method for treating this fracture, but its biomechanical strength has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength produced by posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation. Sacral fractures were created in eight pelvic bone models and classified into a posterior plate fixation group [P group, n=4] and a spinal instrumentation group [R group, n=4]. The biomechanical strength was tested by pushing down on the S1 vertebra from the top. The mean maximum loads were 1,057.4 N and 1,489.4 N in the P and R groups, respectively (p= 0.014). The loads applied to the construct at displacements of 5mm and 7.5mm from the start of the universal testing machine loading were also significantly higher in the R group. The mean stiffness levels in the P and R groups were 88.3N/mm and 119.6N/mm, respectively (p=0.014). Posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation is biomechanically stronger than conventional posterior plate fixation. This procedure may be the optimal method for treating unstable sacral fracture fixation.

AB - Vertical sacral fracture is one of the most difficult fractures to treat. Posterior fixation using spinal dual rods is a novel method for treating this fracture, but its biomechanical strength has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical strength produced by posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation. Sacral fractures were created in eight pelvic bone models and classified into a posterior plate fixation group [P group, n=4] and a spinal instrumentation group [R group, n=4]. The biomechanical strength was tested by pushing down on the S1 vertebra from the top. The mean maximum loads were 1,057.4 N and 1,489.4 N in the P and R groups, respectively (p= 0.014). The loads applied to the construct at displacements of 5mm and 7.5mm from the start of the universal testing machine loading were also significantly higher in the R group. The mean stiffness levels in the P and R groups were 88.3N/mm and 119.6N/mm, respectively (p=0.014). Posterior fixation using spinal instrumentation is biomechanically stronger than conventional posterior plate fixation. This procedure may be the optimal method for treating unstable sacral fracture fixation.

KW - Biomechanical comparison

KW - Posterior fixation

KW - Sacral fracture

KW - Spinal instrumentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984830162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984830162&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 27094834

AN - SCOPUS:84984830162

VL - 70

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - Acta Medica Okayama

JF - Acta Medica Okayama

SN - 0386-300X

IS - 2

ER -