Abstract
In linear mixed-effects (LME) models, if a fitted model has more random-effect terms than the true model, a regularity condition required in the asymptotic theory may not hold. In such cases, the marginal Akaike information criterion (AIC) is positively biased for (−2) times the expected log-likelihood. The asymptotic bias of the maximum log-likelihood as an estimator of the expected log-likelihood is evaluated for LME models with balanced design in the context of parameter-constrained models. Moreover, bias-reduced marginal AICs for LME models based on a Monte Carlo method are proposed. The performance of the proposed criteria is compared with existing criteria by using example data and by a simulation study. It was found that the bias of the proposed criteria was smaller than that of the existing marginal AIC when a larger model was fitted and that the probability of choosing a smaller model incorrectly was decreased.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-115 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Statistics |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |
Keywords
- Kullback–Leibler distance
- model selection
- parameter constraints
- restricted maximum likelihood
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty