Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity

Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength

Patricia Makishi, Suppason Thitthaweerat, Alireza Sadr, Yasushi Shimada, Adriano Luis Martins, Junji Tagami, Marcelo Giannini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the sealing ability and the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of different adhesive systems bonded to dentin in class I cavities. Methods Round tapered dentin cavities (3-mm diameter, 1.5-mm height) prepared in extracted human molars were restored using composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior) with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2: ASB2), two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond: CSEB), all-in-one adhesives (G-Bond Plus: GBP; Tri-S Bond Plus: TSBP), or no adhesive (Control), or bonded using low-shrinkage composite with its proper adhesive (Filtek Silorane, Silorane Adhesive System: FSS). After 24-h water storage or 10,000 cycles of thermal stress, the specimens were immersed into a contrast agent. Two and three-dimensional images were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean percentage of high brightness (HB%) at the interfacial zone in cross-sectional images was calculated as an indicator of contrast agent or gap at the interface. The specimens were then sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured. Results The HB% (ASB2 = TSBP = CSEB < FSS = GBP) and MTBS (CSEB = ASB2, CSEB > TSBP = GBP = FSS, ASB2 > FSS) differed significantly among the adhesives. After aging, HB% increased for GBP and FSS specimens, and the MTBS decreased for FSS specimens (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, p < 0.05). The HB% and MTBS were significantly and negatively correlated (p = 0.002). Confocal laser scanning and scanning electron micrographs confirmed contrast agent infiltration within the gap. Significance There was a significant correlation between sealing performance and bond strength of the adhesives in the whole cavity. After aging, the two-step systems showed equal or superior performance to the all-in-one and Silorane systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2584
Pages (from-to)e190-e200
JournalDental Materials
Volume31
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Optical tomography
Optical Coherence Tomography
Adhesives
Imaging techniques
Silorane Resins
Luminance
Contrast Media
Dentin
Aging of materials
Scanning
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Composite Resins
Composite materials
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Infiltration
Thermal stress
Analysis of Variance
Lasers
Resins
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Adhesive
  • Bond strength
  • Contrast agent
  • Marginal adaptation
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Silver staining

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity : Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. / Makishi, Patricia; Thitthaweerat, Suppason; Sadr, Alireza; Shimada, Yasushi; Martins, Adriano Luis; Tagami, Junji; Giannini, Marcelo.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2584, 01.09.2015, p. e190-e200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makishi, Patricia ; Thitthaweerat, Suppason ; Sadr, Alireza ; Shimada, Yasushi ; Martins, Adriano Luis ; Tagami, Junji ; Giannini, Marcelo. / Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity : Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. In: Dental Materials. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 9. pp. e190-e200.
@article{f2fdcb9ecc8345cdaf86fa789e48b3cc,
title = "Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength",
abstract = "Abstract Objectives To evaluate the sealing ability and the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of different adhesive systems bonded to dentin in class I cavities. Methods Round tapered dentin cavities (3-mm diameter, 1.5-mm height) prepared in extracted human molars were restored using composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior) with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2: ASB2), two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond: CSEB), all-in-one adhesives (G-Bond Plus: GBP; Tri-S Bond Plus: TSBP), or no adhesive (Control), or bonded using low-shrinkage composite with its proper adhesive (Filtek Silorane, Silorane Adhesive System: FSS). After 24-h water storage or 10,000 cycles of thermal stress, the specimens were immersed into a contrast agent. Two and three-dimensional images were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean percentage of high brightness (HB{\%}) at the interfacial zone in cross-sectional images was calculated as an indicator of contrast agent or gap at the interface. The specimens were then sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured. Results The HB{\%} (ASB2 = TSBP = CSEB < FSS = GBP) and MTBS (CSEB = ASB2, CSEB > TSBP = GBP = FSS, ASB2 > FSS) differed significantly among the adhesives. After aging, HB{\%} increased for GBP and FSS specimens, and the MTBS decreased for FSS specimens (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, p < 0.05). The HB{\%} and MTBS were significantly and negatively correlated (p = 0.002). Confocal laser scanning and scanning electron micrographs confirmed contrast agent infiltration within the gap. Significance There was a significant correlation between sealing performance and bond strength of the adhesives in the whole cavity. After aging, the two-step systems showed equal or superior performance to the all-in-one and Silorane systems.",
keywords = "Adhesive, Bond strength, Contrast agent, Marginal adaptation, Optical coherence tomography, Silver staining",
author = "Patricia Makishi and Suppason Thitthaweerat and Alireza Sadr and Yasushi Shimada and Martins, {Adriano Luis} and Junji Tagami and Marcelo Giannini",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.013",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "e190--e200",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity

T2 - Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength

AU - Makishi, Patricia

AU - Thitthaweerat, Suppason

AU - Sadr, Alireza

AU - Shimada, Yasushi

AU - Martins, Adriano Luis

AU - Tagami, Junji

AU - Giannini, Marcelo

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Abstract Objectives To evaluate the sealing ability and the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of different adhesive systems bonded to dentin in class I cavities. Methods Round tapered dentin cavities (3-mm diameter, 1.5-mm height) prepared in extracted human molars were restored using composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior) with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2: ASB2), two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond: CSEB), all-in-one adhesives (G-Bond Plus: GBP; Tri-S Bond Plus: TSBP), or no adhesive (Control), or bonded using low-shrinkage composite with its proper adhesive (Filtek Silorane, Silorane Adhesive System: FSS). After 24-h water storage or 10,000 cycles of thermal stress, the specimens were immersed into a contrast agent. Two and three-dimensional images were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean percentage of high brightness (HB%) at the interfacial zone in cross-sectional images was calculated as an indicator of contrast agent or gap at the interface. The specimens were then sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured. Results The HB% (ASB2 = TSBP = CSEB < FSS = GBP) and MTBS (CSEB = ASB2, CSEB > TSBP = GBP = FSS, ASB2 > FSS) differed significantly among the adhesives. After aging, HB% increased for GBP and FSS specimens, and the MTBS decreased for FSS specimens (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, p < 0.05). The HB% and MTBS were significantly and negatively correlated (p = 0.002). Confocal laser scanning and scanning electron micrographs confirmed contrast agent infiltration within the gap. Significance There was a significant correlation between sealing performance and bond strength of the adhesives in the whole cavity. After aging, the two-step systems showed equal or superior performance to the all-in-one and Silorane systems.

AB - Abstract Objectives To evaluate the sealing ability and the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of different adhesive systems bonded to dentin in class I cavities. Methods Round tapered dentin cavities (3-mm diameter, 1.5-mm height) prepared in extracted human molars were restored using composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior) with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2: ASB2), two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond: CSEB), all-in-one adhesives (G-Bond Plus: GBP; Tri-S Bond Plus: TSBP), or no adhesive (Control), or bonded using low-shrinkage composite with its proper adhesive (Filtek Silorane, Silorane Adhesive System: FSS). After 24-h water storage or 10,000 cycles of thermal stress, the specimens were immersed into a contrast agent. Two and three-dimensional images were obtained using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The mean percentage of high brightness (HB%) at the interfacial zone in cross-sectional images was calculated as an indicator of contrast agent or gap at the interface. The specimens were then sectioned into beams and the MTBS measured. Results The HB% (ASB2 = TSBP = CSEB < FSS = GBP) and MTBS (CSEB = ASB2, CSEB > TSBP = GBP = FSS, ASB2 > FSS) differed significantly among the adhesives. After aging, HB% increased for GBP and FSS specimens, and the MTBS decreased for FSS specimens (ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, p < 0.05). The HB% and MTBS were significantly and negatively correlated (p = 0.002). Confocal laser scanning and scanning electron micrographs confirmed contrast agent infiltration within the gap. Significance There was a significant correlation between sealing performance and bond strength of the adhesives in the whole cavity. After aging, the two-step systems showed equal or superior performance to the all-in-one and Silorane systems.

KW - Adhesive

KW - Bond strength

KW - Contrast agent

KW - Marginal adaptation

KW - Optical coherence tomography

KW - Silver staining

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938275858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938275858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.013

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - e190-e200

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 9

M1 - 2584

ER -