Abstract
Background: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the between- instrument variation of the HPLC method for the measurement of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), VLDL- cholesterol (VLDL-C), chylomicron cholesterol (CM-C), LDL size, and HDL size. Furthermore, the accuracy of the HPLC was assessed for the determination of TC and HDL-C, compared with CDC reference methods. Methods: We used four HPLC instruments with different column-load numbers from 250 to 5000. For accuracy assessment of TC and HDL-C, we used the reference methods recommended by the CDC. Results: The values measured by the four instruments were highly correlated with each other (mean r = 0.965), and the absolute mean differences were 4-43 mg/L for TC, 4-30 mg/L for HDL-C, 0-48 mg/L for LDL-C, 7-66 mg/L for VLDL-C, 0-7 mg/L for CM-C, 0.1-0.3 nm for LDL size, and 0-0.1 nm for HDL size. For TC, the HPLC instruments showed high correlation and good agreement with the reference method: r = 0.997; total error
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 63-72 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Clinical Chemistry |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Biochemistry
Cite this
Assessment of between-instrument variations in a HPLC method for serum lipoproteins and its traceability to reference methods for total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol. / Usui, Shinichi; Nakamura, Masakazu; Jitsukata, Kazuhiro; Nara, Masayuki; Hosaki, Seijin; Okazaki, Mitsuyo.
In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2000, p. 63-72.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of between-instrument variations in a HPLC method for serum lipoproteins and its traceability to reference methods for total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol
AU - Usui, Shinichi
AU - Nakamura, Masakazu
AU - Jitsukata, Kazuhiro
AU - Nara, Masayuki
AU - Hosaki, Seijin
AU - Okazaki, Mitsuyo
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Background: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the between- instrument variation of the HPLC method for the measurement of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), VLDL- cholesterol (VLDL-C), chylomicron cholesterol (CM-C), LDL size, and HDL size. Furthermore, the accuracy of the HPLC was assessed for the determination of TC and HDL-C, compared with CDC reference methods. Methods: We used four HPLC instruments with different column-load numbers from 250 to 5000. For accuracy assessment of TC and HDL-C, we used the reference methods recommended by the CDC. Results: The values measured by the four instruments were highly correlated with each other (mean r = 0.965), and the absolute mean differences were 4-43 mg/L for TC, 4-30 mg/L for HDL-C, 0-48 mg/L for LDL-C, 7-66 mg/L for VLDL-C, 0-7 mg/L for CM-C, 0.1-0.3 nm for LDL size, and 0-0.1 nm for HDL size. For TC, the HPLC instruments showed high correlation and good agreement with the reference method: r = 0.997; total error
AB - Background: The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the between- instrument variation of the HPLC method for the measurement of total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), VLDL- cholesterol (VLDL-C), chylomicron cholesterol (CM-C), LDL size, and HDL size. Furthermore, the accuracy of the HPLC was assessed for the determination of TC and HDL-C, compared with CDC reference methods. Methods: We used four HPLC instruments with different column-load numbers from 250 to 5000. For accuracy assessment of TC and HDL-C, we used the reference methods recommended by the CDC. Results: The values measured by the four instruments were highly correlated with each other (mean r = 0.965), and the absolute mean differences were 4-43 mg/L for TC, 4-30 mg/L for HDL-C, 0-48 mg/L for LDL-C, 7-66 mg/L for VLDL-C, 0-7 mg/L for CM-C, 0.1-0.3 nm for LDL size, and 0-0.1 nm for HDL size. For TC, the HPLC instruments showed high correlation and good agreement with the reference method: r = 0.997; total error
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033961728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033961728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 10620573
AN - SCOPUS:0033961728
VL - 46
SP - 63
EP - 72
JO - Clinical Chemistry
JF - Clinical Chemistry
SN - 0009-9147
IS - 1
ER -