Abstract
The direct-current potential difference method (DC-PDM) is known as one of the best techniques to evaluate the damage initiated in structural materials. However, it is not still very popular and has not yet been widely used. One of its main reasons is that the potential difference measured is not supported based on the physical background and the relationship between the damage and the potential difference is not clarified quantitatively. In this paper, DC-PDM is classified into several categories based on the distribution of defects, the number of potential measurement probes, and the location of current supply probes. Characteristics of all categories are described.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP |
| Pages | 183-189 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Volume | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Event | ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2008 - Chicago, IL, United States Duration: Jul 27 2008 → Jul 31 2008 |
Other
| Other | ASME 2008 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, PVP2008 |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| City | Chicago, IL |
| Period | 7/27/08 → 7/31/08 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Mechanical Engineering
Cite this
Application of direct-current potential difference method to evaluation of various damages in conductive materials. / Tada, Naoya.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP. Vol. 5 2008. p. 183-189.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Application of direct-current potential difference method to evaluation of various damages in conductive materials
AU - Tada, Naoya
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The direct-current potential difference method (DC-PDM) is known as one of the best techniques to evaluate the damage initiated in structural materials. However, it is not still very popular and has not yet been widely used. One of its main reasons is that the potential difference measured is not supported based on the physical background and the relationship between the damage and the potential difference is not clarified quantitatively. In this paper, DC-PDM is classified into several categories based on the distribution of defects, the number of potential measurement probes, and the location of current supply probes. Characteristics of all categories are described.
AB - The direct-current potential difference method (DC-PDM) is known as one of the best techniques to evaluate the damage initiated in structural materials. However, it is not still very popular and has not yet been widely used. One of its main reasons is that the potential difference measured is not supported based on the physical background and the relationship between the damage and the potential difference is not clarified quantitatively. In this paper, DC-PDM is classified into several categories based on the distribution of defects, the number of potential measurement probes, and the location of current supply probes. Characteristics of all categories are described.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956987736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956987736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/PVP2008-61534
DO - 10.1115/PVP2008-61534
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9780791848289
VL - 5
SP - 183
EP - 189
BT - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP
ER -