An evaluation of alternative household solid waste treatment practices using life cycle inventory assessment mode

Nguyen Phuc Thanh, Yasuhiro Matsui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Waste disposal is an important part of the life cycle of a product and is associated with environmental burdens like any other life-cycle stages. In this study, an integrated assessment for solid waste treatment practices, especially household solid waste, was undertaken to evaluate the impact contribution of household solid waste treatment alternatives towards the sustainable development by using Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method. A case study has been investigated under various possible scenarios, such as (1) landfill without landfill gas recovery, (2) landfill with landfill gas recovery and flaring, (3) landfill with landfill gas recovery and electric generation, (4) composting, and (5) incineration. The evaluation utilized the Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method for multiple assessments based on various aspects, such as greenhouse gas emission/ reduction, energy generation/consumption, economic benefit, investment and operating cost, and land use burden. The results showed that incineration was the most efficient alternative for greenhouse gas emission reduction, economic benefit, energy recovery, and land use reduction, although it was identified as the most expensive for investment and operating cost, while composting scenario was also an efficient alternative with quite economic benefit, low investment and operating cost, and high reduction of land use, although it was identified as existing greenhouse gas emission and no energy generation. Furthermore, the aim of this study was also to establish localized assessment methods that waste management agencies, environmental engineers, and environmental policy decision makers can use to quantify and compare the contribution to the impacts from different waste treatment options.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3515-3527
Number of pages13
JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume184
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

domestic waste
Waste treatment
waste treatment
Solid wastes
Land fill
solid waste
Life cycle
assessment method
life cycle
landfill
greenhouse gas
incineration
Gas emissions
land use
composting
Operating costs
Greenhouse gases
Land use
Recovery
Composting

Keywords

  • Greenhousegas(GHG)emission
  • Household solid waste
  • Life Cycle Inventory Assessment (LCIA)
  • Scenario analysis
  • Waste treatment practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Pollution

Cite this

An evaluation of alternative household solid waste treatment practices using life cycle inventory assessment mode. / Thanh, Nguyen Phuc; Matsui, Yasuhiro.

In: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 184, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 3515-3527.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc7f1c6ae2a54a3f8284d5dfbe886d08,
title = "An evaluation of alternative household solid waste treatment practices using life cycle inventory assessment mode",
abstract = "Waste disposal is an important part of the life cycle of a product and is associated with environmental burdens like any other life-cycle stages. In this study, an integrated assessment for solid waste treatment practices, especially household solid waste, was undertaken to evaluate the impact contribution of household solid waste treatment alternatives towards the sustainable development by using Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method. A case study has been investigated under various possible scenarios, such as (1) landfill without landfill gas recovery, (2) landfill with landfill gas recovery and flaring, (3) landfill with landfill gas recovery and electric generation, (4) composting, and (5) incineration. The evaluation utilized the Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method for multiple assessments based on various aspects, such as greenhouse gas emission/ reduction, energy generation/consumption, economic benefit, investment and operating cost, and land use burden. The results showed that incineration was the most efficient alternative for greenhouse gas emission reduction, economic benefit, energy recovery, and land use reduction, although it was identified as the most expensive for investment and operating cost, while composting scenario was also an efficient alternative with quite economic benefit, low investment and operating cost, and high reduction of land use, although it was identified as existing greenhouse gas emission and no energy generation. Furthermore, the aim of this study was also to establish localized assessment methods that waste management agencies, environmental engineers, and environmental policy decision makers can use to quantify and compare the contribution to the impacts from different waste treatment options.",
keywords = "Greenhousegas(GHG)emission, Household solid waste, Life Cycle Inventory Assessment (LCIA), Scenario analysis, Waste treatment practice",
author = "Thanh, {Nguyen Phuc} and Yasuhiro Matsui",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10661-011-2205-5",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "3515--3527",
journal = "Environmental Monitoring and Assessment",
issn = "0167-6369",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of alternative household solid waste treatment practices using life cycle inventory assessment mode

AU - Thanh, Nguyen Phuc

AU - Matsui, Yasuhiro

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Waste disposal is an important part of the life cycle of a product and is associated with environmental burdens like any other life-cycle stages. In this study, an integrated assessment for solid waste treatment practices, especially household solid waste, was undertaken to evaluate the impact contribution of household solid waste treatment alternatives towards the sustainable development by using Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method. A case study has been investigated under various possible scenarios, such as (1) landfill without landfill gas recovery, (2) landfill with landfill gas recovery and flaring, (3) landfill with landfill gas recovery and electric generation, (4) composting, and (5) incineration. The evaluation utilized the Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method for multiple assessments based on various aspects, such as greenhouse gas emission/ reduction, energy generation/consumption, economic benefit, investment and operating cost, and land use burden. The results showed that incineration was the most efficient alternative for greenhouse gas emission reduction, economic benefit, energy recovery, and land use reduction, although it was identified as the most expensive for investment and operating cost, while composting scenario was also an efficient alternative with quite economic benefit, low investment and operating cost, and high reduction of land use, although it was identified as existing greenhouse gas emission and no energy generation. Furthermore, the aim of this study was also to establish localized assessment methods that waste management agencies, environmental engineers, and environmental policy decision makers can use to quantify and compare the contribution to the impacts from different waste treatment options.

AB - Waste disposal is an important part of the life cycle of a product and is associated with environmental burdens like any other life-cycle stages. In this study, an integrated assessment for solid waste treatment practices, especially household solid waste, was undertaken to evaluate the impact contribution of household solid waste treatment alternatives towards the sustainable development by using Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method. A case study has been investigated under various possible scenarios, such as (1) landfill without landfill gas recovery, (2) landfill with landfill gas recovery and flaring, (3) landfill with landfill gas recovery and electric generation, (4) composting, and (5) incineration. The evaluation utilized the Life Cycle Inventory Assessment method for multiple assessments based on various aspects, such as greenhouse gas emission/ reduction, energy generation/consumption, economic benefit, investment and operating cost, and land use burden. The results showed that incineration was the most efficient alternative for greenhouse gas emission reduction, economic benefit, energy recovery, and land use reduction, although it was identified as the most expensive for investment and operating cost, while composting scenario was also an efficient alternative with quite economic benefit, low investment and operating cost, and high reduction of land use, although it was identified as existing greenhouse gas emission and no energy generation. Furthermore, the aim of this study was also to establish localized assessment methods that waste management agencies, environmental engineers, and environmental policy decision makers can use to quantify and compare the contribution to the impacts from different waste treatment options.

KW - Greenhousegas(GHG)emission

KW - Household solid waste

KW - Life Cycle Inventory Assessment (LCIA)

KW - Scenario analysis

KW - Waste treatment practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863759444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863759444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10661-011-2205-5

DO - 10.1007/s10661-011-2205-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 21773866

AN - SCOPUS:84863759444

VL - 184

SP - 3515

EP - 3527

JO - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

JF - Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

SN - 0167-6369

IS - 6

ER -