TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis of Urethral and Ureteral Margins During Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
T2 - A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis
AU - European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group (EAU YAU)
AU - Laukhtina, Ekaterina
AU - Rajwa, Pawel
AU - Mori, Keiichiro
AU - Moschini, Marco
AU - D'Andrea, David
AU - Abufaraj, Mohammad
AU - Soria, Francesco
AU - Mari, Andrea
AU - Krajewski, Wojciech
AU - Albisinni, Simone
AU - Teoh, Jeremy Yuen Chun
AU - Quhal, Fahad
AU - Sari Motlagh, Reza
AU - Mostafaei, Hadi
AU - Katayama, Satoshi
AU - Grossmann, Nico C.
AU - Enikeev, Dmitry
AU - Zimmermann, Kristin
AU - Fajkovic, Harun
AU - Glybochko, Petr
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Pradere, Benjamin
N1 - Funding Information:
Ekaterina Laukhtina is supported by the EUSP Scholarship of the EAU. Keiichiro Mori is supported by The Uehara Memorial Foundation . Nico C. Grossmann is supported by the Zurich Cancer League .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Context: The question of the ability of frozen section analysis (FSA) to accurately detect malignant pathology intraoperatively has been discussed for many decades. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic estimates of FSA of the urethral and ureteral margins in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). Evidence acquisition: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies analyzing the association between FSA and the final urethral and ureteral margin status in patients treated with RC for BCa. The primary endpoint was the value of pathologic detection of urethral and ureteral malignant involvement with FSA during RC compared with the final margin status. We included studies that provided true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative values for FSA, which allowed us to calculate the diagnostic estimates. Evidence synthesis: Fourteen studies, comprising 8208 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Forest plots revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for FSA of urethral margins during RC were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91–0.97), respectively. While for the FSA of ureteral margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.67–0.84) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. Calculated diagnostic odds ratios indicated high FSA effectiveness, and patients with a positive urethral or ureteral margin at final pathology are over 100 times more likely to have positive FSA than patients without margin involvement at final pathology. Area under the curves of 96.6% and 96.7% were reached for FSA detection of urethral and ureteral tumor involvement, respectively. Conclusions: Intraoperative FSA demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting both urethral and ureteral malignant involvement at the time of RC for BCa. FSA of both urethral and ureteral margins during RC is accurate enough to be of great value in the routine management of BCa patients treated with RC. While its specificity was great to guide intraoperative decision-making, its sensitivity remains suboptimal yet. Patient summary: We believe that the frozen section analysis of both urethral and ureteral margins during radical cystectomy should be considered more often in urologic practice, until quality of life–based cost-effectiveness studies can identify patients within each institution who are unlikely to benefit from it.
AB - Context: The question of the ability of frozen section analysis (FSA) to accurately detect malignant pathology intraoperatively has been discussed for many decades. Objective: We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic estimates of FSA of the urethral and ureteral margins in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BCa). Evidence acquisition: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies analyzing the association between FSA and the final urethral and ureteral margin status in patients treated with RC for BCa. The primary endpoint was the value of pathologic detection of urethral and ureteral malignant involvement with FSA during RC compared with the final margin status. We included studies that provided true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative values for FSA, which allowed us to calculate the diagnostic estimates. Evidence synthesis: Fourteen studies, comprising 8208 patients, were included in the quantitative synthesis. Forest plots revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity for FSA of urethral margins during RC were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.91–0.97), respectively. While for the FSA of ureteral margins, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.67–0.84) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98), respectively. Calculated diagnostic odds ratios indicated high FSA effectiveness, and patients with a positive urethral or ureteral margin at final pathology are over 100 times more likely to have positive FSA than patients without margin involvement at final pathology. Area under the curves of 96.6% and 96.7% were reached for FSA detection of urethral and ureteral tumor involvement, respectively. Conclusions: Intraoperative FSA demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting both urethral and ureteral malignant involvement at the time of RC for BCa. FSA of both urethral and ureteral margins during RC is accurate enough to be of great value in the routine management of BCa patients treated with RC. While its specificity was great to guide intraoperative decision-making, its sensitivity remains suboptimal yet. Patient summary: We believe that the frozen section analysis of both urethral and ureteral margins during radical cystectomy should be considered more often in urologic practice, until quality of life–based cost-effectiveness studies can identify patients within each institution who are unlikely to benefit from it.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Frozen section
KW - Radical cystectomy
KW - Urothelial carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107929785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107929785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.010
DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.010
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34127436
AN - SCOPUS:85107929785
SN - 2405-4569
VL - 8
SP - 752
EP - 760
JO - European Urology Focus
JF - European Urology Focus
IS - 3
ER -