Abnormality diagnosis based on processing reaction force in deburring by rotary brush

Takumi Hatano, Masayuki Nunobiki, Koichi Okuda, Hiroyuki Kodama

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

Recently, automation and labor saving are advancing in the factory. It is necessary to develop some abnormality diagnostic system, because operators usually leave a machining device after mounting tools and workpieces on the machining device. This research developed an abnormality diagnostic method for deburring process using an articulated robot with a rotary brush device. It was able to detect some abnormalities such as erroneous mounting of the rotary brush and heavy wear of the brush which have a bad influence on processing performance. In our experiment, the rotary brush was pressed against a surface of test piece slowly, the processing reaction force after contact are measured, and the increasing ratio of the reaction force was calculated. In case of erroneous mounting of the rotary brush, larger reaction force than usual was observed. In case of heavy wear of the brush, the increasing ratio of the reaction force differed from the ratio of normal brush. It was clarified that appearance of the reaction force depends on the state of rotary brush.

Original languageEnglish
Pages673-678
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event20th International Symposium on Advances in Abrasive Technology, ISAAT 2017 - Okinawa, Japan
Duration: Dec 3 2017Dec 6 2017

Conference

Conference20th International Symposium on Advances in Abrasive Technology, ISAAT 2017
Country/TerritoryJapan
CityOkinawa
Period12/3/1712/6/17

Keywords

  • Abnormality diagnosis
  • Reaction force
  • Rotary brush

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abnormality diagnosis based on processing reaction force in deburring by rotary brush'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this