A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies

The Emergency Coma Scale

Chiaki Takahashi, Hiroshi Okudera, Hideki Origasa, Eiichi Takeuchi, Kazuhito Nakamura, Osamu Fukuda, Isao Date, Takashi Tokutomi, Tohru Aruga, Tetsuya Sakamoto, Hitoshi Kobata, Tomio Ohta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The Emergency Coma Scale (ECS) was developed in Japan in 2003. We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the utility of the ECS by comparison of the ECS and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Methods: Ten medical facilities, including 4 university hospitals in Japan, participated in this study. We evaluated and recorded the level of consciousness, using the ECS and GCS, of all patients transported to these medical facilities by ambulance. We then performed a statistical analysis of the level of rater agreement of each scale using the average weighted κ coefficient according to the types of diagnosis at time of discharge and the occupations of the raters. We then evaluated the relationship between outcome of patients and their scores on the ECS and GCS by logistic regression analysis. Results: The ECS showed the greater agreement among raters in patient scoring (0.802). In patients with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular disease, the ECS also yielded the higher agreement (0.846 and 0.779, respectively). The ECS score appears to be more strongly related than the GCS to patient outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Conclusions: Our results showed that the ECS is a simple and readily understandable coma scale for a wide range of professionals in the field of neurologic emergencies. Furthermore, ECS appears to be suitable for evaluating patients in neurologic emergency settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-202
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Coma
Nervous System
Emergencies
Glasgow Coma Scale
Japan
Glasgow Outcome Scale
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Ambulances
Brain Diseases
Consciousness
Occupations
Multicenter Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Takahashi, C., Okudera, H., Origasa, H., Takeuchi, E., Nakamura, K., Fukuda, O., ... Ohta, T. (2011). A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies: The Emergency Coma Scale. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 29(2), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.018

A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies : The Emergency Coma Scale. / Takahashi, Chiaki; Okudera, Hiroshi; Origasa, Hideki; Takeuchi, Eiichi; Nakamura, Kazuhito; Fukuda, Osamu; Date, Isao; Tokutomi, Takashi; Aruga, Tohru; Sakamoto, Tetsuya; Kobata, Hitoshi; Ohta, Tomio.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 2, 02.2011, p. 196-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahashi, C, Okudera, H, Origasa, H, Takeuchi, E, Nakamura, K, Fukuda, O, Date, I, Tokutomi, T, Aruga, T, Sakamoto, T, Kobata, H & Ohta, T 2011, 'A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies: The Emergency Coma Scale', American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.018
Takahashi, Chiaki ; Okudera, Hiroshi ; Origasa, Hideki ; Takeuchi, Eiichi ; Nakamura, Kazuhito ; Fukuda, Osamu ; Date, Isao ; Tokutomi, Takashi ; Aruga, Tohru ; Sakamoto, Tetsuya ; Kobata, Hitoshi ; Ohta, Tomio. / A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies : The Emergency Coma Scale. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 196-202.
@article{84057a62f5f947208a2a884a9cb9f38b,
title = "A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies: The Emergency Coma Scale",
abstract = "Objectives: The Emergency Coma Scale (ECS) was developed in Japan in 2003. We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the utility of the ECS by comparison of the ECS and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Methods: Ten medical facilities, including 4 university hospitals in Japan, participated in this study. We evaluated and recorded the level of consciousness, using the ECS and GCS, of all patients transported to these medical facilities by ambulance. We then performed a statistical analysis of the level of rater agreement of each scale using the average weighted κ coefficient according to the types of diagnosis at time of discharge and the occupations of the raters. We then evaluated the relationship between outcome of patients and their scores on the ECS and GCS by logistic regression analysis. Results: The ECS showed the greater agreement among raters in patient scoring (0.802). In patients with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular disease, the ECS also yielded the higher agreement (0.846 and 0.779, respectively). The ECS score appears to be more strongly related than the GCS to patient outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Conclusions: Our results showed that the ECS is a simple and readily understandable coma scale for a wide range of professionals in the field of neurologic emergencies. Furthermore, ECS appears to be suitable for evaluating patients in neurologic emergency settings.",
author = "Chiaki Takahashi and Hiroshi Okudera and Hideki Origasa and Eiichi Takeuchi and Kazuhito Nakamura and Osamu Fukuda and Isao Date and Takashi Tokutomi and Tohru Aruga and Tetsuya Sakamoto and Hitoshi Kobata and Tomio Ohta",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.018",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "196--202",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simple and useful coma scale for patients with neurologic emergencies

T2 - The Emergency Coma Scale

AU - Takahashi, Chiaki

AU - Okudera, Hiroshi

AU - Origasa, Hideki

AU - Takeuchi, Eiichi

AU - Nakamura, Kazuhito

AU - Fukuda, Osamu

AU - Date, Isao

AU - Tokutomi, Takashi

AU - Aruga, Tohru

AU - Sakamoto, Tetsuya

AU - Kobata, Hitoshi

AU - Ohta, Tomio

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - Objectives: The Emergency Coma Scale (ECS) was developed in Japan in 2003. We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the utility of the ECS by comparison of the ECS and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Methods: Ten medical facilities, including 4 university hospitals in Japan, participated in this study. We evaluated and recorded the level of consciousness, using the ECS and GCS, of all patients transported to these medical facilities by ambulance. We then performed a statistical analysis of the level of rater agreement of each scale using the average weighted κ coefficient according to the types of diagnosis at time of discharge and the occupations of the raters. We then evaluated the relationship between outcome of patients and their scores on the ECS and GCS by logistic regression analysis. Results: The ECS showed the greater agreement among raters in patient scoring (0.802). In patients with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular disease, the ECS also yielded the higher agreement (0.846 and 0.779, respectively). The ECS score appears to be more strongly related than the GCS to patient outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Conclusions: Our results showed that the ECS is a simple and readily understandable coma scale for a wide range of professionals in the field of neurologic emergencies. Furthermore, ECS appears to be suitable for evaluating patients in neurologic emergency settings.

AB - Objectives: The Emergency Coma Scale (ECS) was developed in Japan in 2003. We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the utility of the ECS by comparison of the ECS and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Methods: Ten medical facilities, including 4 university hospitals in Japan, participated in this study. We evaluated and recorded the level of consciousness, using the ECS and GCS, of all patients transported to these medical facilities by ambulance. We then performed a statistical analysis of the level of rater agreement of each scale using the average weighted κ coefficient according to the types of diagnosis at time of discharge and the occupations of the raters. We then evaluated the relationship between outcome of patients and their scores on the ECS and GCS by logistic regression analysis. Results: The ECS showed the greater agreement among raters in patient scoring (0.802). In patients with traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular disease, the ECS also yielded the higher agreement (0.846 and 0.779, respectively). The ECS score appears to be more strongly related than the GCS to patient outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Conclusions: Our results showed that the ECS is a simple and readily understandable coma scale for a wide range of professionals in the field of neurologic emergencies. Furthermore, ECS appears to be suitable for evaluating patients in neurologic emergency settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751673778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751673778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.09.018

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 196

EP - 202

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 2

ER -