A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers

Yohei Takeshita, Mayumi Shimizu, Kazutoshi Okamura, Shoko Yoshida, Warangkana Weerawanich, Kenji Tokumori, Gainer R. Jasa, Kazunori Yoshiura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND). Methods: We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (DG), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above DG. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability. Results: The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of $1.5. Conclusions: This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20160331
JournalDentomaxillofacial Radiology
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Polytetrafluoroethylene
Differential Threshold
Noise
Tokyo
Aluminum
Mandible
Japan
Observation
Water

Keywords

  • CBCT
  • Computer-assisted
  • Dental
  • Dental
  • Digital radiography
  • Image analysis
  • Imaging
  • Phantoms
  • Radiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Takeshita, Y., Shimizu, M., Okamura, K., Yoshida, S., Weerawanich, W., Tokumori, K., ... Yoshiura, K. (2017). A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 46(3), [20160331]. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160331

A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers. / Takeshita, Yohei; Shimizu, Mayumi; Okamura, Kazutoshi; Yoshida, Shoko; Weerawanich, Warangkana; Tokumori, Kenji; Jasa, Gainer R.; Yoshiura, Kazunori.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 46, No. 3, 20160331, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takeshita, Y, Shimizu, M, Okamura, K, Yoshida, S, Weerawanich, W, Tokumori, K, Jasa, GR & Yoshiura, K 2017, 'A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers', Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 46, no. 3, 20160331. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160331
Takeshita, Yohei ; Shimizu, Mayumi ; Okamura, Kazutoshi ; Yoshida, Shoko ; Weerawanich, Warangkana ; Tokumori, Kenji ; Jasa, Gainer R. ; Yoshiura, Kazunori. / A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers. In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 3.
@article{fec70800e5094ce2892bede2052ecfd2,
title = "A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers",
abstract = "Objectives: To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND). Methods: We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (DG), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above DG. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability. Results: The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of $1.5. Conclusions: This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.",
keywords = "CBCT, Computer-assisted, Dental, Dental, Digital radiography, Image analysis, Imaging, Phantoms, Radiography",
author = "Yohei Takeshita and Mayumi Shimizu and Kazutoshi Okamura and Shoko Yoshida and Warangkana Weerawanich and Kenji Tokumori and Jasa, {Gainer R.} and Kazunori Yoshiura",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr.20160331",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new method to evaluate image quality of CBCT images quantitatively without observers

AU - Takeshita, Yohei

AU - Shimizu, Mayumi

AU - Okamura, Kazutoshi

AU - Yoshida, Shoko

AU - Weerawanich, Warangkana

AU - Tokumori, Kenji

AU - Jasa, Gainer R.

AU - Yoshiura, Kazunori

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Objectives: To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND). Methods: We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (DG), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above DG. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability. Results: The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of $1.5. Conclusions: This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.

AB - Objectives: To develop an observer-free method for quantitatively evaluating the image quality of CBCT images by applying just-noticeable difference (JND). Methods: We used two test objects: (1) a Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene) plate phantom attached to a dry human mandible; and (2) a block phantom consisting of a Teflon step phantom and an aluminium step phantom. These phantoms had holes with different depths. They were immersed in water and scanned with a CB MercuRay (Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at tube voltages of 120 kV, 100 kV, 80 kV and 60 kV. Superimposed images of the phantoms with holes were used for evaluation. The number of detectable holes was used as an index of image quality. In detecting holes quantitatively, the threshold grey value (DG), which differentiated holes from the background, was calculated using a specific threshold (the JND), and we extracted the holes with grey values above DG. The indices obtained by this quantitative method (the extracted hole values) were compared with the observer evaluations (the observed hole values). In addition, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the shallowest detectable holes and the deepest undetectable holes were measured to evaluate the contribution of CNR to detectability. Results: The results of this evaluation method corresponded almost exactly with the evaluations made by observers. The extracted hole values reflected the influence of different tube voltages. All extracted holes had an area with a CNR of $1.5. Conclusions: This quantitative method of evaluating CBCT image quality may be more useful and less time-consuming than evaluation by observation.

KW - CBCT

KW - Computer-assisted

KW - Dental

KW - Dental

KW - Digital radiography

KW - Image analysis

KW - Imaging

KW - Phantoms

KW - Radiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015149514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015149514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20160331

DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20160331

M3 - Article

C2 - 28045343

AN - SCOPUS:85015149514

VL - 46

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

IS - 3

M1 - 20160331

ER -