A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement

Yvonne Leong, Sayoko Kotani, Carolyn Best, Phaedra Diamond, Danny Lovatsis, Harold Drutz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly decrease the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of women. In 2005, provincial and territorial wait time benchmarks were set in areas such as hip and knee replacement, but such efforts were lagging for urogynaecological surgeries. This study aimed to compare wait times and HRQOL scores of females awaiting surgery for POP with those of women awaiting hip or knee replacement. Methods This was a prospectively planned study comparing women undergoing surgical repair of POP to women having a hip or knee replacement. All women completed a validated HRQOL questionnaire, the Short Form 36 Health Survey. The date of the decision to operate was recorded and patients were followed up prospectively to determine surgical wait time. Results Three of four physical health concepts were significantly worse for orthopedic patients compared with urogynaecology patients, including the physical component summary (29.2 vs. 41.5, respectively, P < 0.001). Urogynaecology and orthopedic patients had similar emotional and mental well-being, as demonstrated by similar mental component summaries (41.5 vs. 44.6, respectively, P = 0.09). The mean wait time at our institution for hip or knee replacement was 98 days, which was significantly shorter than the mean wait time of 210 days for POP surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusion Despite less physical and pain impact, urogynaecology patients showed similar emotional distress and mental impact compared with orthopedic patients based on a validated HRQOL questionnaire. Because urogynaecology patients waited more than twice as long for their surgery, resources should be directed to prioritize and improve the surgical wait time for urogynaecology patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-346
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hip
Knee
Quality of Life
Orthopedics
Physical Phenomena
Benchmarking
Health Surveys
Pain
Health

Keywords

  • pelvic organ prolapse
  • Quality of life
  • waiting lists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement. / Leong, Yvonne; Kotani, Sayoko; Best, Carolyn; Diamond, Phaedra; Lovatsis, Danny; Drutz, Harold.

In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 341-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leong, Yvonne ; Kotani, Sayoko ; Best, Carolyn ; Diamond, Phaedra ; Lovatsis, Danny ; Drutz, Harold. / A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement. In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 341-346.
@article{d50d4443f6d94e07af126a1d99b442a6,
title = "A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement",
abstract = "Objective Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly decrease the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of women. In 2005, provincial and territorial wait time benchmarks were set in areas such as hip and knee replacement, but such efforts were lagging for urogynaecological surgeries. This study aimed to compare wait times and HRQOL scores of females awaiting surgery for POP with those of women awaiting hip or knee replacement. Methods This was a prospectively planned study comparing women undergoing surgical repair of POP to women having a hip or knee replacement. All women completed a validated HRQOL questionnaire, the Short Form 36 Health Survey. The date of the decision to operate was recorded and patients were followed up prospectively to determine surgical wait time. Results Three of four physical health concepts were significantly worse for orthopedic patients compared with urogynaecology patients, including the physical component summary (29.2 vs. 41.5, respectively, P < 0.001). Urogynaecology and orthopedic patients had similar emotional and mental well-being, as demonstrated by similar mental component summaries (41.5 vs. 44.6, respectively, P = 0.09). The mean wait time at our institution for hip or knee replacement was 98 days, which was significantly shorter than the mean wait time of 210 days for POP surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusion Despite less physical and pain impact, urogynaecology patients showed similar emotional distress and mental impact compared with orthopedic patients based on a validated HRQOL questionnaire. Because urogynaecology patients waited more than twice as long for their surgery, resources should be directed to prioritize and improve the surgical wait time for urogynaecology patients.",
keywords = "pelvic organ prolapse, Quality of life, waiting lists",
author = "Yvonne Leong and Sayoko Kotani and Carolyn Best and Phaedra Diamond and Danny Lovatsis and Harold Drutz",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "341--346",
journal = "Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada",
issn = "1701-2163",
publisher = "Healthcare & Financial Pub.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life of Women Awaiting Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery versus Hip or Knee Replacement

AU - Leong, Yvonne

AU - Kotani, Sayoko

AU - Best, Carolyn

AU - Diamond, Phaedra

AU - Lovatsis, Danny

AU - Drutz, Harold

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Objective Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly decrease the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of women. In 2005, provincial and territorial wait time benchmarks were set in areas such as hip and knee replacement, but such efforts were lagging for urogynaecological surgeries. This study aimed to compare wait times and HRQOL scores of females awaiting surgery for POP with those of women awaiting hip or knee replacement. Methods This was a prospectively planned study comparing women undergoing surgical repair of POP to women having a hip or knee replacement. All women completed a validated HRQOL questionnaire, the Short Form 36 Health Survey. The date of the decision to operate was recorded and patients were followed up prospectively to determine surgical wait time. Results Three of four physical health concepts were significantly worse for orthopedic patients compared with urogynaecology patients, including the physical component summary (29.2 vs. 41.5, respectively, P < 0.001). Urogynaecology and orthopedic patients had similar emotional and mental well-being, as demonstrated by similar mental component summaries (41.5 vs. 44.6, respectively, P = 0.09). The mean wait time at our institution for hip or knee replacement was 98 days, which was significantly shorter than the mean wait time of 210 days for POP surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusion Despite less physical and pain impact, urogynaecology patients showed similar emotional distress and mental impact compared with orthopedic patients based on a validated HRQOL questionnaire. Because urogynaecology patients waited more than twice as long for their surgery, resources should be directed to prioritize and improve the surgical wait time for urogynaecology patients.

AB - Objective Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) can significantly decrease the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of women. In 2005, provincial and territorial wait time benchmarks were set in areas such as hip and knee replacement, but such efforts were lagging for urogynaecological surgeries. This study aimed to compare wait times and HRQOL scores of females awaiting surgery for POP with those of women awaiting hip or knee replacement. Methods This was a prospectively planned study comparing women undergoing surgical repair of POP to women having a hip or knee replacement. All women completed a validated HRQOL questionnaire, the Short Form 36 Health Survey. The date of the decision to operate was recorded and patients were followed up prospectively to determine surgical wait time. Results Three of four physical health concepts were significantly worse for orthopedic patients compared with urogynaecology patients, including the physical component summary (29.2 vs. 41.5, respectively, P < 0.001). Urogynaecology and orthopedic patients had similar emotional and mental well-being, as demonstrated by similar mental component summaries (41.5 vs. 44.6, respectively, P = 0.09). The mean wait time at our institution for hip or knee replacement was 98 days, which was significantly shorter than the mean wait time of 210 days for POP surgery (P < 0.001). Conclusion Despite less physical and pain impact, urogynaecology patients showed similar emotional distress and mental impact compared with orthopedic patients based on a validated HRQOL questionnaire. Because urogynaecology patients waited more than twice as long for their surgery, resources should be directed to prioritize and improve the surgical wait time for urogynaecology patients.

KW - pelvic organ prolapse

KW - Quality of life

KW - waiting lists

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016503886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016503886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.005

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 341

EP - 346

JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

SN - 1701-2163

IS - 5

ER -