[A comparison of four commercial radiation treatment planning systems for prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy].

Motoharu Sasaki, Hitoshi Ikushima, Yuji Nakaguchi, Tarou Kishi, Masashi Kimura, Ryouta Bandou, Masataka Oita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

At present, every manufacturer of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) equipment uses multi-leaf collimators (MLCs); however, each company's intensity modulation methods and dose calculation algorithms differ. This study used four typical radiation treatment planning systems (RTPSs) employed domestically for prostate IMRT plans to carry out 15 case studies by one planner based on the dose limits at this clinic. The results were used to compare the differences, if any, in RTPS treatment plans. With prostate IMRT plans, an overlap area exists between the PTV and the rectum. For this reason, while observing dose limits of 60-75 Gy (within the dose tolerated by the rectum), securing uniformity and concentration of dose is essential to create the most appropriate treatment plan for the PTV and other targets. Although each RTPS uses different planning methods, it was generally possible to observe this clinic's dose limits by adjusting the parameter values. When identical beam data is used, it is possible to create similar treatment plans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)761-772
Number of pages12
JournalNihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi
Volume69
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of '[A comparison of four commercial radiation treatment planning systems for prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy].'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this